similar to: load balancing

Hi I want to use two dsl (or more) lines to increase my internet bandwidth. Our dsl lines are dhcp serviced, so when we pull together two dsl modems, both of them provide the same def gw and different ip in the same subnet (i also assume that arping gives the same MAC for the def gw since it''s a bridged network). ¿Is it possible to balance outgoing traffic "using" the

Hi There, We currently using iproute2 for load balancing. However we need more upload speed as we load balance over 3 dsl lines. I''ve been looking for a way to combine the upload speed to more faster. Found a site called www.upstreaminter.net where these guys bond the adsl channels to improve uploads, Since downloading is problem as its need to know the ip address of the downloader they

Hello lartc! I have strange problem setting load balancing over 4 interfaces. Something won''t accept more than 3 interfaces, While setting: ip route add default scope global \ nexthop via 0.0.0.0 dev pvc0 weight 1 \ nexthop via 0.0.0.0 dev pvc1 weight 1 \ nexthop via 0.0.0.0 dev pvc2 weight 1 It''s ok: ip r l default nexthop dev pvc0

Hello, We have 3 DSL connections connected to eth3 and another interface with a dedicated link in eth0 (main table) We want to balance selected traffic (using fwmark and iptables) through our 3 DSL connections in a secondary table named DSL (without using the dedicated link in eth0), but the next command is not accepted, and gives us the following error: # ip route add default

Hello Everyone, Hope everyone is doing well. First off I would like to say that Lartc has been an invaluable source of information for me, I was looking for a solution and a bit of google''ing found this wonderful HOW-TO. So now down to the Question: I have three Internet connections, (Soon to be four if I can get this working) ETH0 - 2mb/2mb ETH1 - 7mb/1mb ETH2 - 7mb/1mb I wish

Hi, My company is testing btrfs (kernel 2.6.38) on a slave MySQL database server with a 195Gb filesystem (of which about 123Gb is used). So far, we''re quite impressed with the performance. Our database loads are high, and if filesystem performance wasn''t good, MySQL replication wouldn''t be able to keep up and the slave latency would begin to climb. This though, is

Hello, I have a question about multichannel and the load-balancing algorithm. What kind of algorithm is it? (Roud-robin, dynamic round-robin, ...) What are the arguments the algorithm compute to load-balance the network traffic on the interfaces? I already know that if a 10Gb/s interface and a 1Gb/s interfaces are in the multichannel connection the 1Gb/s one will be ignored until the 10Gb/s goes

hi, i keep on fighting with balancing my two internet conections.. ive improved a routing like this: root@debian:/wk/ESTADISTICAS/Trafico_en_kisero_hq# ip route list 172.0.0.0/24 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 172.0.0.82 172.0.0.0/24 dev eth1 proto kernel scope link src 172.0.0.81 default nexthop via 172.0.0.1 dev eth0 weight 1 nexthop via 172.0.0.1 dev eth1

Hi, I was wondering if anyone has had any experience with using the Dfs functionality within Samba. I've been searching for any performance information and or documentation regarding Dfs in particular load balancing i.e. 1) How does it load balance? Is it some sort of round robin? 2) Is there a limit to the number of servers that can used in the load balance? 3) How many requests per

Hello! We're looking for a solution to reliably load balance our Asterisk boxes. So far we've been using a hodge-podge of directing different services to different boxes/IPs, but eventually I'd like to consolidate things so we can present a single IP address to the outside world. My question is - how do we go about doing that? I've read a lot of things like load-balancing via

Hi, I have searched the archives on the topic, and it seems that the list gurus favor load balancing to be done in the kernel as opposed to other means. I have been using a home-grown approach, which splits traffic based on `-m statistic --mode random --probability X`, then CONNMARKs the individual connections and the kernel happily routes them. I understand that for > 2 links it will become

Hello In the LARCT how-to subitem: 4.2.2. Load balancing the following phrase says: "" Instead of choosing one of the two providers as your default route, you now set up the default route to be a multipath route. In the default kernel this will balance routes over the two providers. It is done as follows (once more building on the example in the section on split-access): ip

Hi I have a potential project for which my client requests that we load balance the streaming service. Of course, the Icecast server scales very well. - http://icecast.org/loadtest/ However, the client requests high-availability and, due to the scale of the potential project, we would like to load balance the service over two or more servers. I think the load balancing aspect is not my

Hi All, Can anyone help me hash out how best to load balance a website that is getting considerable traffic? In the past I only have experience with BigIP where you have a load balancing device that keeps track and send traffic to the best server possible at the time. This was a proprietary system that I think was something Dell rebranded. Right now, the whole site is is 400gb of video, HTML5,

Hi I want to use two dsl (or more) lines to increase my internet bandwidth. Our dsl lines are dhcp serviced. Both of them provide the same Def GW and different IPs for each ethernet interface (same subnet). ¿Is it possible to balance outgoing traffic "using" the interface as a criteria? No point on choosing gateway by IP. ¿Could someone give me a clue on how to deal with this? (first

I''ve read through the nano documentation, and it says that it wont handle scenarios where the main traffic is input. Also, I''ve read through the linuxvirtualserver documentation, and i dont think that applies to me either, as that set up intercepts traffic and manipulates the final destination IP and port for the traffic. What I would like to do is 1) from the ISP standpoint,

ibmonitor - interactive bandwidth monitor version 1.0.1 Released on 1st July 2003 ibmonitor is an interactive linux console application which shows bandwidth consumed and total data transferred on all interfaces. Its main features are: * Shows received, transmitted and total bandwidth of each interface * Calculates and displays the combined value of all interfaces * Displays total

Hello all, I have a linux machine with a SIP server (Asterisk) and 2 WAN interfaces (NATed) configured to do load balancing. I experienced problems with the SIP/RTP protocols and load balancing, because when initiating a call to an external SIP Host, a new RTP flow starts from the server to the Host, that sometimes uses another default route (due to the nexthop configuration). As i have two

Hello world, so, with beta2 of Dovecot 2.0 being available, what is the preferred way to achieve load balancing and fault tolerance? As far as I can see it, there are basically two options: 1) Use a HA shared storage, export either a cluster filesystem or NFS, and have your dovecot servers mount that file system. Load balance these servers (Cisco ACE, ldirectord, ...) and there you go. Overall

We are building an exchange cluster with two front end Outlook Web Access servers. We would like to at least have some sort of failover, and prefereably load balancing for them. The MS recommended way is to use NLB, but for various reasons that's not working with our set up. We are looking to set up a single linux server and use something like LVS to load balance/fail over the