similar to: Multihoming & routing & NAT problem

Try to SNAT the incoming conection too, then your server see only the 200.x.x.x IP for the incoming calls. You have DNAT for redirections, add a postrouting SNAT. I supose that you are DNATing in PREROUTING and you will add a rule (only for example) for SNAT the incoming calls from 200.x.x.x router: iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -d <internal server ip> -j MASQUERADE Perhaps

Cross posted to Netfilter and LARTC... Grant & ArcosCom Linux User Thanks for your replies. Firstly, one problem was with my Token Bucket Filler on one of the interfaces, as it was dropping lots of packets and stopping connections from working over that interface. This lead to some strange results, with apparent partial success. Secondly, I''ve decided against trying to get it

I am running 2.4.20 with Julian Anastasov''s patches (routes-2.4.20-9.diff), iptables v1.2.6a, iproute2-ss010824 on Debian. I have set up our internal gateway to multihome 2 T1''s as described in http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/~julian/nano.txt . The only difference is that I use multiple IP''s on the external interfaces. EXA A.B.C.225 --------------------

Hello all, I have a linux router with 2 interfaces(eth0 - ISP and eth1 - LAN). I''ve established a VPN connection(openvpn) over eth0 with a friend of mine => tun0 interface. I want half of my LAN to have Internet access through the eth0 interface and the other half through the tun0 interface. I''ve set up a script like the "load balancing split access" instructions

Hi, I have searched the archives on the topic, and it seems that the list gurus favor load balancing to be done in the kernel as opposed to other means. I have been using a home-grown approach, which splits traffic based on `-m statistic --mode random --probability X`, then CONNMARKs the individual connections and the kernel happily routes them. I understand that for > 2 links it will become

Specifying a source for the multipath route solved the problem. > ip rule add priority 200 table multi should be ip rule add prio 200 from $INT_NET table multi > ip route add default table multi proto static \ > nexthop via $EXB_GW dev $EXB_IF weight 1 \ > nexthop via $EXA_GW dev $EXA_IF weight 1 g

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 All, are there any plans to allow FreeBSD jails to bind to more than one IP address? My scenario (virtual hosting) : 3 front-end hosts with 2 interfaces each, one on the public network, the other on a private subnet. 1 back-end host, providing NFS mounts for the front-ends. This scenarion is not uncommon in ISP environments, usually with a big

Hello, i wrote a simple but useful (i hope) bash script featuring a easly and fastly configuration method for implementing a Linux Gateway feauturing Incoming/Outgoing MultiHomed/LoadBalanced Subsystem Management. I want share this little script. you can download a copy from the following address: http://www.initzero.it/products/opensource/izbalancing/download/izbalancing just save it in your

Hi there, I just got a new machine with Redhat Enterprise Workstation and samba 3.0.0-14 pre-installed. I am trying to connect it to my existing network which has a redhat v8 samba v2 PDC controlling 16 or so win2k and winxp machines. In the nmbd log I get this error 3 times every 5 seconds or so: nmbd/nmbd_packets.c:process_nmb_request(1448) process_nmb_request: Multihomed registration

Hello: I am currently planning to divide our network in smaller subnets. Our central server is a Samba AD DC File Server also acting as DC. My plan is subnet our current network, add a new interface for each subnet in the Samba File Server and configure it to listen in all new interfaces. Questions: 1 - Does this multihomed configuration have any drawback, specifically because AD relies

I have samba4 installed on two systems: ncssamba1 and ncssamba2. ncssamba1 is the PDC, ncssamba2 was joined to the domain using the instructions here: http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba4/HOWTO/Join_a_domain_as_a_DC I had to manually add the DNS information as mentioned on that page. I can add a user and the user is replicated. However, I have some issues with DNS resolving hostnames.

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=928 Summary: Kerberos/GSSAPI authentication does not work with multihomed hosts Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: -current Platform: Other URL: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openssh-unix- dev&m=108008882620573 OS/Version: All

(was: "Re: Pending OpenSSH release, call for testing", topic drift at its finest :-) Markus Moeller wrote: > Douglas, > > OK three possible settings(hostname,connection IP,GSS_C_NO_NAME) are fine for me too. Does GSS_C_NO_NAME relate to this bug (addressless tickets)? http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=488 BTW, I opened a bug the the multihomed thing a couple of

I am not sure if anyone has done this but I am assuming it has been done before. Setting up a multihomed DHCP server accross multiple network blocks to issue PXE/BOOTP setup actions? Some background, I have successfully setup PXE to work with a cross over cable (first setup and testing env.), moved cient/server to switch and configured boot menu, images etc. and now after setting up the

Hi, This is another attempt to get my gssapi for multi homed systems into openssh. Please find attach a small change so that gssapi authentication works on multihomed systems. Regards Markus -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: openssh-3.8p1-mm.diff Type: application/octet-stream Size: 3599 bytes Desc: not available Url :

Hi all, i''m new at LARTC, and after reading the docs I found no solution to my problem ... On one side I have eth0 conected to the LAN, on the other side I have eth1 conected to a switch and to 3 DSL routers with 3 diferent providers, and also eth2 conected to a cisco 2600 conected to a LDMS line. I have readed the larct docs about multihomed conections to internet, but I''m

Hello, I''m new to the list and iproute2 itself. I was searching for a way to simultaneously use several IPs on the *same network interface* for outbound traffic. Let me explain: I have eth0 interface to which I set 2 IP addresses; 192.168.0.1 and 192.168.0.2. Then I want to connect to Internet through 192.168.0.254 gateway using round-robin between those 2 addresses. The iproute2

Hello all, I have a linux machine with a SIP server (Asterisk) and 2 WAN interfaces (NATed) configured to do load balancing. I experienced problems with the SIP/RTP protocols and load balancing, because when initiating a call to an external SIP Host, a new RTP flow starts from the server to the Host, that sometimes uses another default route (due to the nexthop configuration). As i have two

Chris, Perhaps you need to perform some write_conf like command. I''m not sure if this is needed in 1.6 or not. Shane ----- Original Message ----- From: lustre-discuss-bounces at lists.lustre.org <lustre-discuss-bounces at lists.lustre.org> To: lustre-discuss <lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org> Sent: Fri Mar 07 12:03:17 2008 Subject: Re: [Lustre-discuss] Multihomed