similar to: May problem with iproute2 nexthop?

Hello, LARTC mailing readers, I hope u can help with this mysterious issue i''m having with my linux box acting as a router. Scenario: Linux running 2.6.8.1 /w julians patches Latest iproute (iproute2-ss040702) 4 NICS ----------------- | x eth0 (63.43.x.x) network mask (255.255.240.0) | | x eth1 (63.43.x.x)

Hello, LARTC mailing readers, I hope u can help with this mysterious issue i''m having with my linux box acting as a router. Scenario: Linux running 2.6.8.1 /w julians patches /w support for multipath routing Latest iproute (iproute2-ss040702) 4 NICS ----------------- | x eth0 (63.43.x.x) network mask (255.255.240.0) | |

Thanks Jose, I found the key in the routing table of Router2; it had bad entries for the farest subnets (didn't have the 'via' commands...). Thanks for helping me. Now I'm gonna configure the network with IPv6 'cause I have to make it work with Mobile IPv6. Anybody working on these funny things can mail me, so we can suffer togheter! :-) Bye, Mauro -----Messaggio

Hi, I have a large network with linux (or OpenBSD) routers which all run samba servers. There are also win95,98,2k and XP clients. I didn't completely understand BROWSING-Config.txt. Eg.: (clients1) --- (ROUTER1) --- (clients2) --- (ROUTER2) --- (client3) | | (ROUTER3) --- (clients4) How should I set those routers?

> I've been having troubles getting cross subnet browsing working in > existance with a WinNT domain master (hey, it's not my machine). > Basically what is happening is that I am trying to setup a VPN (which > shouldn't complicate things) that browsing will work across. The idea is > this: > > There is an office in my local city that I'm connecting San

For anyone to answer that clearly, we''d need a bit more information. Firstly, what is connected to router1 and router2? In other words, does the router box you want to use have enough ports (and of the right type) to actually handle all of the connections? Secondly, can we assume that you have enough access to the box you want to use to be able to install the software and configure it?

I've been having troubles getting cross subnet browsing working in existance with a WinNT domain master (hey, it's not my machine). Basically what is happening is that I am trying to setup a VPN (which shouldn't complicate things) that browsing will work across. The idea is this: There is an office in my local city that I'm connecting San Francisco to via VPN. The TCP/IP part is

Hello list, Here is a setup of my network: eth0 <-> router1 <-> eth2 --- wifi --- eth2 <-> router2 <-> eth0 | | eth1 eth1 Router1: eth0 - Internet connection eth1 - Local network (network 10.1.1.0/24) eth2 - Wireless AP (network 10.1.10.0/24) Router2: eth0 - Internet

Dear tinc community, I am using tinc in switch mode. I have three nodes. Two nodes reside on routers, vpn-eth is bridged with internal lan, each router has several machines connected to it's internal lan. Third node is the roadwarrior - "endpoint" linux PC. When the roadwarrior is off - everything works perfectly, machines on both sides can communicate without a problem in any

Hello all, I am new to Linux Ethernet bridging. Let me first start with what I am trying to achieve. Well you see - I am attempting to have 2 main firewall running at the same time - one as a master and the other one as a slave. Yes, I would like to make use of Ethernet bridging in this scenario - as I understand it, all I need are two machines and STP enabled. I am running Debian

So this is a little off topic but this list is so helpful!! Is this the correct way to split our /24 block up? Tom suggested something like this in an earlier post but that did not work either. So what should I change to make this work? Internet<===Shorewall Box===>router1<++++T1 Line++++>router2<==LAN I need a /28 on the Shorewall side of things and the rest on the LAN side of

Hi, The network topo looks like this: the original network: router1 router2 | | |----------------OSPF------------| the target network: (we need to insert a transparent firewall between these 2 routers, so a proxy arp is set up on firewall to bridge router1 and router2) router1 firewall router2 |

Hi all I have a problem splitting traffic behind 2 adsl. My situation: _________router2 | lan1 ------- fw ----------- router1 | lan2----------| lan1 use router1, lan2 router2. The linux default gw is set to router2, lan2 browse internet without any problem (icmp, tcp..). Lan1 is blocked. >From lan1 i can ping router1, and i''ve set

Hi I set-up a gre tunnel between two linux boxes. A short diagram is like this lan1 -> router1 ----- router2 <- lan2 The tunnel works fine, i can ping from lan1 to lan2 but the problem is the speed between lan1 and lan2 is lower than it supposed to be If i log in to router1 and transfer something from router2 or lan2 it is working at maximum speed, 1024kbits/s. The problem is if i log in

Hi folks, I have 2 firewalls, setup with Centos 5.2. They are also routers, connected to 2 upstream routers. I have some cases where connections from servers to the internet leave my network via router2 and answers come back via router1. So I added conntrack tools to both routers/firewalls to synchronize the session tables (using ftfw procotol). That works as expected. If e.g. I ping from

Hello, The setup is : Asterisk ------<www> ------- Router1---------<LAN> --------- SIP Phones | | |------------------<pstn>----------Router2------------| (I hope the sketch is understandable. If not, it could be summarized with : "SIP hardphones on a given LAN are connected to an Asterisk server through 2

Hi, I am trying to set up a VPN that allows mobile users to access multcast information from an information vendor. Hence Tinc is configured as a switch. Internet --[ router1 ]------[eth0 VPN eth1]--------------[ router2 ]--------- mobile users VPN server is running Ubuntu 10.04 and is also configured as a dhcp server that hands out IP address to connecting mobile users. A bridge (br0) is

I have had Shorewall 2.0.8 up and running for a month or so. Now I need to change some things around. Currently I am running on a private IP scheme and Shorewall is setup based on the 3 interface guide. Now I want to change to a public scheme on my "loc" zone. I have a /24 block of public IP''s. I need my private scheme and public to co-exist so I currently have is eth1 (local)

Hello all. I wonder if there is a way, to do smth like that: fot requests like: arp who-has 192.168.1.13 tell 192.168.4.31 arp who-has 192.168.1.122 tell 192.168.1.31 always answer 192.168.x,x ? i mean I'd have one machine which would have all the MAC's <> IS's like ( arp -s IP M:A:C ) And i'd like to give that 'data' to users, which

Hi, I have problem with multicast routing on my network. I tried mrouted and also pimd, but always same problem. When I set mrouted or pimd on one router, everything works fine, but when I start mrouted/pimd on another one, routing die. In moment when I start anorher mrouted/pimd /proc/net/ip_mr_cache is cleaned. My topology: gateway (no mrouted/pimd)