Displaying 20 results from an estimated 900 matches similar to: "Somewhat basic routing question"
2004 Sep 30
7
asterisk 407 Proxy Authentication Required
Hello,
I cannot accept any inboud calls from any provders in my asterisk
which tries to authenticate the provider and at the end rejects the
call with tthese message
407 Proxy Authentication Required
How do I turn off this message.
Thanks.
Ehsanul Karim
2006 Nov 14
6
netmask 255.255.255.255 vs ip route add via ... (bug?)
Greetings routing folks,
I want to use the netmask 255.255.255.255 to insulate (not quite
isolate) machines on a shared subnet from each other. This works
just fine on win XP, but Linux iproute will not acccept the
gateway address in one step -- neither on the command line nor
via DHCP:
Here''s the interface, set up with a netmask of /32:
# ip addr
...
2: eth0:
2004 Jun 16
7
Trafic monitor
Hello !
I use Slackware Linux on a box for routing and SNAT for a small network:
|eth0: 80.97.108.1|
|
|
|eth1: 192.168.1.1| ..........| my network (192.168.1.0/24)|
I search for a tool show-me on real time the trafic made by all/one IPon the interface eth1, somethings simple ; EX:
192.168.1.10 ........... x kbit/s
192.168.1.11 ........... y kbit/s
192.168.1.12
2017 Jan 31
0
windows 10 locking profile files
I am running samba 4.5.1 on Ubuntu 16.04. The samba server is running as an AD DC and stores the user profiles, the clients are all windows 10 professional.
One user reported being locked out of the profile pretty regularly. After investigating the case I saw that a lot of files in the profile are still locked even after logging out and shutting down the system. After restarting the samba server,
2017 Mar 21
2
dovecot POP3 log shows too many identical RETR entries
Hello,
Dovecot log is showing too many POP3 RETR entries which are identical
lines. I also suspect that it is causing high pop traffic eating most of
the network bandwidth. Here are some of the lines out of 11009 in a
day. Such pattern is observed only for few users. dovecot version is
2.1.17.
==============
Mar 20 00:00:07 pi3 dovecot: pop3(user at example.com): Disconnected:
Logged out
2017 Jun 18
0
gluster peer probe failing
Hi,
Below please find the reserved ports and log, thanks.
sysctl net.ipv4.ip_local_reserved_ports:
net.ipv4.ip_local_reserved_ports = 30000-32767
glusterd.log:
[2017-06-18 07:04:17.853162] I [MSGID: 106487] [glusterd-handler.c:1242:__glusterd_handle_cli_probe] 0-glusterd: Received CLI probe req 192.168.1.17 24007
[2017-06-18 07:04:17.853237] D [MSGID: 0] [common-utils.c:3361:gf_is_local_addr]
2018 Jan 30
5
[Bug 1220] New: Reverse path filtering using "fib" needs better documentation
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1220
Bug ID: 1220
Summary: Reverse path filtering using "fib" needs better
documentation
Product: nftables
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: minor
Priority: P5
Component: nft
2005 Sep 01
0
Re: Polycom 301 second line registration
> Is your Asterisk server listening on port 5061? If not, just change
> the
> entry to 5060.
Also, I'm not sure how your sip.conf is set up for asterisk, but if
you've set it up like:
[203]
type=friend
username=blah
secret=blah
etc...
Your Polycom config file will generally look like this.
<PHONE_CONFIG>
<OVERRIDES
2018 Apr 08
0
FW: LDAP getent issues
Hi,
I've gone through the following link about member server and also the samba 3 by example and can confirm that nsdc is not enabled.
https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setting_up_Samba_as_a_Domain_Member
We are having some issues with LDAP authentication. Here is our setup
PDC and LDAP(samba classic) = dc01
SambaClassic domain = stdom
Member server = fs01
We migrated from TDB to LDAP.
2002 Dec 13
1
help me with rules
I want to reject all ports to 217.17.41.0/24 for one IP 192.168.1.6 and give
only WWW from 217.17.41.87 to client computer 192.168.1.6. Please help me
... I have done it in rules file :
REJECT net:217.17.41.0/24 local:192.168.1.6 tcp
REJECT local:192.168.1.6 net:217.17.41.0/24 tcp
REJECT net:217.17.41.0/24 local:192.168.1.6 udp
REJECT local:192.168.1.6 net:217.17.41.0/24 udp
ACCEPT
2017 Jun 20
0
gluster peer probe failing
Hi,
I am able to recreate the issue and here is my RCA.
Maximum value i.e 32767 is being overflowed while doing manipulation on it
and it was previously not taken care properly.
Hence glusterd was crashing with SIGSEGV.
Issue is being fixed with "
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1454418" and being backported
as well.
Thanks
Gaurav
On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 6:43 AM, Gaurav
2017 Jun 20
1
gluster peer probe failing
Thanks Gaurav!
1. Any time estimation on to when this fix would be released?
2. Any recommended workaround?
Best,
Guy.
From: Gaurav Yadav [mailto:gyadav at redhat.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2017 9:46 AM
To: Guy Cukierman <guyc at elminda.com>
Cc: Atin Mukherjee <amukherj at redhat.com>; gluster-users at gluster.org
Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] gluster peer probe failing
2018 Apr 06
4
LDAP getent issues
Hi,
We are having some issues with LDAP authentication. Here is our setup
PDC and LDAP(samba classic) = dc01
SambaClassic domain = stdom
Member server = fs01
We migrated from TDB to LDAP. The old TDB users are able to login to the domain and access file shares without issues. Any new user created in LDAP is not able to access the shares. When trying to create shared drives for the new users
2004 Jul 16
3
Samba+LDAP - so close yet so far :)
Dear my samba friends & Craig (who has been helping me
with this issue so far), please help me with this one
:) I have a fedora core 1, samba 3.0.5, and openldap
2.1.*, and smbldap-tools 0.8.4.1
When I try to join the domain [AGUILAS] from my XP
(winxp), it is quiting half way through the process.
However, I don't completely understand why. I used
samba log level 3 to diagonose the
2017 Jun 20
2
gluster peer probe failing
Hi,
I have tried on my host by setting corresponding ports, but I didn't see
the issue on my machine locally.
However with the logs you have sent it is prety much clear issue is related
to ports only.
I will trying to reproduce on some other machine. Will update you as s0on
as possible.
Thanks
Gaurav
On Sun, Jun 18, 2017 at 12:37 PM, Guy Cukierman <guyc at elminda.com> wrote:
>
2004 Oct 05
0
Samba 3.0.4 Profile Permissions
When attempting to login to my Samba 3.0.4 PDC from a Windows XP client as a
user with administrative priveleges (in this case, the user is a member of
the adm group in Linux and all members of that group are members of the
Adminstrators group in Windows) I get the following error:
Windows did not load your roaming profile and is attempting to log you on
with your local profile. Changes to
2007 May 11
1
[Somewhat OT] Integrating RSpec and RCov results in Gem''s RDoc
I have a Gem on which the testing is done with RSpec. I would like to
include the results of RSpec and the RCov html files in the RDoc.
The problem is that when I have RDoc include the files, it winds up
escaping all the html. Is there a way to get HTML into RDoc
unprocessed? Or is there some other way I can distribute the RSpec/RCov
results with my Gem integrated with RDoc? I can include
2013 Feb 06
2
Somewhat OT: Specific SIP packets can cause ethernet controller reset
While not strictly Asterisk related this issue could certainly affect
some of you:
http://blog.krisk.org/2013/02/packets-of-death.html
--
Kristian Kielhofner
2007 Jul 27
0
full (serial) console install of linux (somewhat o/t) ?
Hi Folks,
This is probably a little off topic, but I was wondering if anyone has
information on how to do a full (serial/xen) console install of Linux,
as a domU.
I''ve been able to through remote installs using Xen VNC which is OK, but
it would be really nice if I could do a text based install like I can
with Solaris.
Any pointers, anyone?
--joe
2017 Jun 01
0
(Somewhat?) Off topic: Containerization software
This is a nice summary addressing the same with R:
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1410.0846.pdf
On 30 May 2017 at 17:43, Bert Gunter <bgunter.4567 at gmail.com> wrote:
> Folks:
>
> This is **off topic**, but I thought it might be informative to this
> community. Consequently: please **no on list public comments or
> discussion**. Feel free to respond to me privately, if you like; but