similar to: ADSL traffic shaping to improve latency

Sorry I pressed the wrong key and sent the message too early... > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Philipp Leusmann [mailto:philipp.leusmann@rwth-aachen.de] > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 8. November 2006 12:53 > An: ''lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl'' > Betreff: Why did I need strange ceiling settings? > > Hi all, > > I recently installed traffic shaping on my

Hello, I''ve been trying to shape the bittorrent traffic (on my external interface, upload), but without luck, for this I''m using layer7 filter right now, but I''ve also tried ipp2p, with the same results, I might say that this is not a problem with this packet classifiers, the problem is with HTB, here''s why. When I open azureus (the bittorrent client I

As seen on my post at: http://www.sveasoft.com/modules/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?p=28112#28112 This works very well... It does NOT work with stable 4.0! sveasoft will be issuing a bug fix for this (4.1) in the near future. Final Rev of working script w/ asterisk support I'm not going to run alchemy on production machines until it is stablish. Remember to set your uplink properly and to set

Hello, some days ago, I was asking for help here about not able to do anything when I had bittorrent running, I will post the problem here: I''m using ipp2p to mark p2p packets, and then send them with -j CLASSIFY to the correct HTB class, I see traffic in the class when I start azurerus, and traffic does get shaped, but then I''m still not able to surf the web nor chat nor

Ok, earlier I post a message explaining my problem with HTB and layer7 (or ipp2p), about not being able to shape the traffic. Well, actually this is what''s happening, I''m marking the packets (right now, I''m using ipp2p as Klaus adviced me to) with iptables, and my queue rules are made using tcng, I''m using the HTB qdisc, and traffic is going to the HTB class

Hi, I''m trying to make a shaper / firewall to improve sharing of bandwidth on a ADSL (3mbit down / ½ mbit up) Since the ADSL is very asymmetric, down is unimportant, I make a ingress rate limit shaper to ensure, all shaping is at the Shaper, and not on the Router or the ISP. The Idea is then to make one HTB hierarchy and have each client (IP) filtererd and put in a child-HTB queue.

Hi, My home setup is as following: - 1024/128 kbit ADSL - FC3 I set up HTB to prioritize traffic. I am not very pleased with the obtained results. The scope of my setup is to have some ssh sessions with remote servers while browsing websites and running aMule Nothing complicated (I think... ;). The very high priority traffic (ssh), gets stuck when I start aMule and make an FTP download.

--- On Wed, 05 May 2004 14:01:28 +0100 "Andy Furniss" Wrote: > I forgot to say - if you use DSL tweaking uprate right upto the limit > with bulk traffic may not be a good idea. There are atm overheads and > thay are greater (as %) for small packets eg. htb counts empy ack as 40 > bytes but it''s 106 on wire. If people start gaming (30 small pps up > each)

Actually i gave up, i tried and tried and tried so many times, upgrading software falling back to an old version but it didn''t work, that''s it. i can''t do work together tc with iptables and iproute2 when i mark a packet with iptables tc doesn''t recognize them so it falls at the default leaf of the tc''s tree what i like is to mark packets depending on

Hello! I have a quite complicated setup. In my network on each interface there is bandwidth limitation for each user. Booth outgoing (on interface itself) and incoming (attached IMQ) traffic. There is main HTB class which limits bandwidth for whole interface and HTB subclasses for each user. Filtering is done with hashing filters. This setup was working correctly. But now in the network I

OK, here it is. Near perfect bandwidth calculation for ADSL users. Patch iproute2 with the HTB stuff and then this: It''s still a hack (as far as I can tell) because we are patching the rates tables, and hence I think it is only loosly coupled with the actual calculation of bytes in each bucket. However, it works very nicely for me! I have only been lightly testing with

Dear all, I want to make a filter for all IRC-Dalnet traffic, so I want to put all traffic for port 6660, 6661, 6662, 6663, 6664, 6665, 6666, 6667, 6668, 6669, 7000, 7001, 7002, and 8000 to a class. So, I create a TC script as below. I''m sure, it is not effective, and we can write it in simpler. I need help, how to make my script below are simpler. The simpler, the better. Thank you

Hi, I''ve read ADSL-Bandwidth-Management-HOWTO http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/ADSL-Bandwidth-Management-HOWTO/implementation.htm l#AEN166 and I''ve a doubt from script: [ ... ] # DNS name resolution (small packets) iptables -t mangle -A MYSHAPER-OUT -p udp -j MARK --set-mark 21 [ ... ] That is a bug ? I think that " DNS name resolution (small packets) " is better

Hello lartc maintainers and users! I have a router with two NICs. One NIC is connected to the Internet and the other to my internal LAN. I made a script for priorizing interactive traffic. The script matches TOS Minimize-Delay for priorizing interactive trafic, and fwmark for metropolitan packets. I have two root classes (simulating two circuits) : 1:1 for internet and 1:3 for metropolitan.

I have read the thread at http://mailman.ds9a.nl/pipermail/lartc/2006q1/018287.html and still don''t know how to fix this problem. It appears alot of work has gone into it but the HOWTO is so out of date it doesn''t even begin to addresses this method. So here are my questions 1. what is the current state of these patches? are they in a specific version? do i have to patch myself?

Hi, with the attached config my gaming ping is still +20ms, even if the line isn''t saturated..can anybody give me a hint how to get a better response time? my line: 1024/128kbit outbound: one htb qdisc for gaming (7kbps) prio 0 ceil 14kbps<- should get more traffic when needed. Htb again for irc and default. inbound: css, irc, p2p, default <- same shema as before, give css

does anyone know a way to shape outgoing/upload traffic per ip? I have a network and i want to limit the upload with 100kbit per user. Ex: 192.168.1.20 ----> 1024kbit-DOWN / 100kbit-UP 192.168.1.21 ----> 1024kbit-DOWN / 100kbit-UP and so on....... Ive tried CBQ and HTB, but couldnt get is right. the only thing that I did in upload bases was: "tc qdisc add dev ppp0 root tbf rate

Hi all, this is really not really very easy to understand, or, to get in. Well, I''ve the following configuration on the router box: LAN - interface: eth0 - network: 192.168.2.5/24 - bandwidth: 100Mbit/s INET interface - interface: ppp0 - network: .dynamic.ip./0 - bandwidth: DOWN=1536kbit/s and UP=256kbit/s the LAN interface is to serve 6 other clients with internet and

Hi there, i am trying to shape a network for a college dorms... INTERNET---- ETH0--------Nat Box-------ETH1--------LAN I have set up classes of traffic (HTTP, FTP, MAIL, IM, OTHER) and i have assigned a rate for everyone with a HTB qdisc. The limit based in traffic is working flawlessly. However, under every HTB class i have set up a ESFQ queue discipline with hash value set to

Hi, Has anyone used TC in a wireless environment, which is dynamic. I understand that the parameters for queuing are static and cannot be changed unless the queuing discipline is deleted and reloaded with different parameters. If anyone can share any experience, that would be helpful. Thanx. Azim. _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl