similar to: HTB and bridge

hello. i have following setup: a machine (winChip 200mhz cpu, 32mb ram, linux 2.4.28) acting like a bridge with 2 interfaces (eth0 - to our ISP, eth1 - to our network) machine does not have any IP there is a 802.1q vlan eth0.2 eth0.2 and eth1 are bridged in br0 i have one 4mbit link which i share with my friend, i have 3mbit and he has 1mbit all our IP addresses are public and we have the

Hi, I have many example of HTB GUI . All is already well developed, which discussed in this link. However, can anyone teach me what software to use to build a own web based GUI HTB software in Fedoracore ( Linux based) ? Thanks Regards Alan _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl

Hi, I''m trying to make run a simple shaping *through HTB*. I have compiled a new kernel 2.4.21. First command from http://luxik.cdi.cz/~devik/qos/htb/manual/userg.htm said: # tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb default 12 RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument I tryed both standard tc from Debian stable and http://luxik.cdi.cz/~devik/qos/htb/v2/tc.gz this one... I tryed

hi there, this is my 1st message in the list. I would like to use this wondershaper.htb to limit the bandwith usage at home. My kernel config is: # QoS and/or fair queueing # CONFIG_NET_SCHED=y CONFIG_NET_SCH_CBQ=y CONFIG_NET_SCH_HTB=y CONFIG_NET_SCH_CSZ=y CONFIG_NET_SCH_HFSC=y CONFIG_NET_SCH_PRIO=y CONFIG_NET_SCH_RED=y CONFIG_NET_SCH_SFQ=y CONFIG_NET_SCH_TEQL=y CONFIG_NET_SCH_TBF=y

Hello, I''m having some problems using HTB to prioritize traffic on my linux router. The main problem is as follows: I have a 6Mbits channel on the metropolitan network and a 64kbps link for the sites outside my country. These 64kbps are dynamically allocated by my ISP so I usually get something like 128kbps , sometimes 512kbps and even 1 Mbit; it varies all the time. Because of this

Hello, I''ve just recently started to use IMQ and I got puzzled after seeing the imq usage example on the linuximq.net site: It was something like this: tc qdisc add dev imq0 handle 1: root htb default 1 tc class add dev imq0 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 1mbit tc qdisc add dev imq0 parent 1:1 handle 10: htb default 5 tc class add dev imq0 parent 10: classid 10:1 htb rate 256kbit

Hello, Could you tell me how did you solve your problem? I have exactly the same problem but with this configuration: - linux 2.4.20 kernel, HTB option checked - iproute2-2.4.7-now-ss010824.tar.gz installed, which is the latest version I found at ftp://ftp.sunet.se/pub/Linux/ip-routing/, except for "try" or "do not use" versions. I guess I do not need patching iproute2 and

Hello. The problems are: 1. Using HTB I get negative values for tokens and ctokens in tc -s output, for example: mich:~# tc -s -d class show dev eth0 class htb 1:11 parent 1:1 prio 1 quantum 1024 rate 8Kbit ceil 23Kbit burst 1609b/8 mpu 0b cburst 1628b/8 mpu 0b level 0 Sent 0 bytes 0 pkts (dropped 0, overlimits 0) lended: 0 borrowed: 0 giants: 0 tokens: 1287999 ctokens: 453286 class htb 1:1

Hi list, playing around with HTB showed that it may introduces pretty much latency for our setup. Docum.org says the following: "The default qdisc added to a htb class is pfifo_fast qdisc. The size of the qdisc is the device queue length and this is 100 packets for an ethernet device. So if you want to have a shorter queue, you have to add a shorter qdisc to the htb qdisc." Can

Hi, I have the following questions: I only have one htb computer (2 nics) to shape the international traffic as well as the metropolitan traffic (i have a list of metropolitan ip''s to use). Can this be achived using iptables with packet marking (on that htb computer the 2 nics are bridged)? If it can will there be delays introduced by the shaping operation (the metropolitan link is a

Hi there, I have a question with regards to cascading multiple HTB qdiscs. Assume that I want to build the following hierarchy: (qdisc htb 1:0) -> (class htb 1:1) -> (qdisc htb 2:0) -> (class htb 2:1) -> (class htb 2:2) I want to attache aggregate u32 filters at 1:0 for supernets, then at 2:0 (and 3:0, 4:0, etc), I attach the more specific u32 filters for say HTTP and

HTB and imq was used to control traffic. AC="tc class add dev eth0 parent" $AC 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 100kbps burst 2k $AC 1:2 classid 1:10 htb rate 50kbps ceil 100kbps burst 2k prio 1 $AC 1:2 classid 1:11 htb rate 50kbps ceil 100kbps burst 2k prio 1 please tell me the range of "prio" _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? 新鲜到底,娱乐到家 -

Hi all, I''m trying to setup htb on a box with the following class configuration: class htb 1:2 root rate 4Mbit ceil 4Mbit burst 2099b/8 mpu 0b overhead 0b cburst 2099b/8 mpu 0b overhead 0b level 7 Sent 0 bytes 0 pkts (dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 0) lended: 0 borrowed: 0 giants: 0 tokens: 4300 ctokens: 4300 class htb 1:4 parent 1:2 leaf 4: prio 7 quantum 1000 rate 1Kbit ceil

It seems Andreas Klauer''s fairnat has experimental support for using HTB''s MPU and overhead options. fairnat.config: # Use MPU for HTB. From the LARTC Howto on MPU: # "A zero-sized packet does not use zero bandwidth. For ethernet, no packet # uses less than 64 bytes. The Minimum Packet Unit determines the minimal # token usage for a packet." HTB_MPU=0 # HTB_MPU=64

I downloaded iproute2-2.4.7-now-ss010824.tar.gz and I did patched tc with the htb3.6_tc.diff from htb3.6-020525.tgz and when I try to use a htb script I get just errors. I did not patch the kernel, since I use kernel 2.4.21 and I saw on - HTB Homepage that I need to patch it only if I run version 2.4.20 or earlier. Do also need the kernel patch ? Or maybe is something else wrong? RTNETLINK

Hi, I''m trying to setup QoS in my TSL box. Following to mailing list reccomendations I changed PSCHED_CPU but can''t get accurate shaping with HTB. I have disabled HYSTERESIS also (by setting it to 0). I have Intel Celeron 1.8Mhz (TSC supported I think). ******** My script ****** tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb default 22 r2q 10 # Class corresponding interface

Hi again, I just ran into a seriously strange glitch, and was wondering if anybody had experienced this... I have an HTB class with an iptables classifier. The iptables classifier shows packets hitting the rule for this class. Now, HTB drops these packets (''dropped'' increases), even although the packets are small, and there are over 10000 tokens available. Is there any

Hi all: I hope someone can help me with this "little" problem... I''m using a linux script to sub-divide my bandwidth (64kbit) into: 40kbit for VOIP, and the remaining 24kbit for http. So, the commands I''m using are: ============================================ #!/bin/bash # This script shapes "downloading" stuff # Initial qdisc tc qdisc add dev eth1

Todays quick question: Ive had problems with imq and getting my setup to work as planned. Im thinking that a better solution for shaping incoming traffic would be to put a little limit in the outer interface of the router box with ingress, and the shape traffic on the inner interface with htb. Would that be better than using imq? -- Patrick Petersen <lartc@schmakk.dk>

Hi anyone I try to use htb and got some strange situation My hbt config is root htb with default to 999 class Then I make 2 classes 999 and 998 And make many many (near 60) leafs attached to 998 root ! ! 999 998 ---...---> many leafs root attached to ethernet dotQ subinterface 999 make rate where high (50Mbit) but according to tc -s class