similar to: bridge stops bridging

So, I'm setting up my first bridge, and I'm running into an interesting issue. I have a 4 port NIC (formerly 4 seperate /29 and /28 LANs) and an onboard NIC (to my ISP). I've setup the bridge using the script included at the bottom of this email (modified from Gentoo for Aurora). When the WET11 (the WET11 is a simple ethernet to wireless bridge) is unplugged, the bridge works

Hi, I'm trying to build a bridge using a 486DX2/66 with two 10 Mbit Ethernet NICs. The machine (tsushima) is running Debian stable and kernel 2.4.26. Previously I used it as a router, so I know the hardware (NICs) is working. The NICs are as follows: eth0: WD80x3 at 0x280, 00 00 C0 0A 2C 2F WD8003-old, IRQ 10, shared memory at 0xd0000-0xd1fff. eth16i.c: v0.35 01-Jul-1999 Mika Kuoppala

Hello to everybody, We want integrate in a router/firewall (Debian Based, 2.6 Kernel), an HTB shaper. The goal is to divide the traffic for classes of workstations, at example in three classes, let say A, B and C. Example: A 70 Mb/s B 20 Mb/s C 10 Mb/s If B don''t make traffic, 7/8 of 20Mb/s must be assigned to A and all the rest at B We have used CBQ and HTB, with poor succes. Anybody

How can i redirect all traffic that not come from port 80 to a flow ? i was thing about some like tc filter add dev imq1 parent 1: protocol ip prio 7 u32 match ip sport !80 ...... But this not work. Another doubt, if i have two rules that intersects , for example , one filter with u32 match ip src 10.10.10.10 flowid 1:10 and other with u32 match sport 80 0xffff flowid 1:11 , which one will

In 2.4 kernels, there was a [bp]fifo that could be implemented with ''tc add'', but in 2.6 kernels, I find no way to create either of these fifos. I am able to increase txqueuelen. What I desire is a larger number of backlogged packetes before drops occur. How can the output buffer size be increased for HTB? -- gypsy

Hello everyone, We are working on HTB with TC and would like some clarifications from your part. Our example is as follows. We have one HTB root class and two HTB classes attached to it, as in this figure : 1: HTB | | |

hi: my box use eth0 connect my pc. but I type command "./brctl showmacs br0", no mac addr display and the" brctl showmacs program" not exit,always exec # ./brctl show bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces br0 8000.000123456789 no eth0 hdlc0 # ./brctl showmacs br0

Hi, I'm trying to get a Zyxel P2000W (reportedly also sold as WiSIP by Pulver) to work with an asterisk box. The phone connects nicely to an external VoIP company (sipgate.de reportedly using asterisk themselves) but there is a strange problem with my asterisk: - Incoming calls via ISDN (chan_capi) to the Zyxel work perfectly. - Outgoing calls (capi/sip/iax) via asterisk are dialling out

Hello. I am in a strange situation. I have two asterisk. Asterisk "A" makes a call for asterisk "B" by IAX. Asterisk "B" recives the call and delivers it to Openser by SIP. The problem is openser printing this in the screen: ERROR: parse_to : unexpected char ["] in status 5: <<"David" <sip:>> . ERROR:parse_from_header: bad from header

Hi all :) I''ve been using a tc setup for almost two years, but at some point (probably when I switched to kernel 2.6.x, but I''m not sure) it has started making something very weird. For a certain class, the rate is 125000bit and the ceil is 270000bit, but the fastest rate I get is about 75-80000bit, instead of the "promised" 125000, *with no other traffic in

Hi all I have just got a P2000w and experience several problems. Hopefully there is someone out there that has got it working. I saw it on Cebit and the person demonstrating it there told me that it was connected to an Asterisk server on the stand -so it should work. Problem 1: it does not register correctly It get lots of messages like this: Jun 26 19:45:19 NOTICE[1107585968]: chan_sip.c:5630

Sorry this is the right message. Hi all, in my school I have: - two Netopia router for ADSL (perform NAT), - one linux box with 3 ethernet card I want to make a load balancing on the two ADSL line. I have configured the system as follow: The LAN interface, of the two ADSL router, have address (A) 192.168.0.254 (B) 192.168.2.254 The 3 ethernet card, on the linux box, have address: -eth2

Hi all, I''m having a hell of a time getting my IFB to work. I know I''ve done this before, so I''m missing something stupid. Can anybody tell me what it might be? Configs as follows: -------- #!/bin/sh modprobe ifb numifbs=1000 modprobe act_mirred modprobe 8021q brctl addbr br0 brctl setfd br0 0 brctl stp br0 off brctl addif br0 eth1 brctl addif br0 eth2 ifconfig eth1

Hi, Does anyone have suggestions hooking Zyxel Prestige 2002 to Asterisk? I have tested Zyxel Prestige with both supported codecs. Call with G.711 sounds very choppy and cracking. Almost can't understand a word. Today I installed G.729 support into Asterisk but unbearable voice quality remains. It's a little bit better though. I have tested that Zyxel ATA with some commercial SIP

On 2/19/07, Salatiel Filho <salatiel.filho@gmail.com> wrote: > Well , thanks to imq all my client machines are now shaped and > everything is great ... > But now i have a doubt , is there a way to shape the traffic that goes > to the route [doing a wget from the router for example ]? > > > I have a PREROUTING IMQ0 and a POSTROUTING IMQ1 , everything is > working like

(I posted this note on http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-ZyXEL+P2000W+configuration too) I tried to put together comments that were asked for on the P2000W. These configs seem to work fine for a ZyXEL P2000W, thanks to Giles Scott for getting me started with it. DTMF keys work fine and are "read" correctly by Asterisk. It's important that you upgrade your phone to a modern version

Here is the scenario: I have one server with kernel 2.4.24 with a bridge br0 made of 2 interfaces, eth0 and tap0 (the last is an OpenVPN tunnel), and one remote computer connetting through tap0. If I assign a static IP to the remote computer, the bridge works perfecly (so I think the problem is not OpenVPN-related). If I start a DHCPd on the server and I configure the remote client to get the

I have a Debian 8 64-bit machine set up as a server and apt-got the tinc package. I configured tinc as a bridge and everything seems normal except that the tunnel does not forward multicast traffic. I used tcpdump to examine the br0, eth0 and tap interfaces. I could see multicast packets on both br0 and eth0, but there is no such packet present on the tap interface. I don't quite know why

Hello, I''m running xen-3.0.2-3 and try to share the 4 ports of a adaptec 4port ethernet card between dom0 and domU by using pciback.hide. Therefor I had to modify the domU driver for the tulip cards due to the fact that there is only one eeprom on the board and all 4 ports of the card are using the same interrupt line. When starting the dom0 tulip driver (unmodified) I get two working

When I start xen dom0 I get that same dhcp address for eth0 and for xen-br0, dom0 can talk to the world. If I start each of my 3 domU''s mannually, each guest gets a xen-br0 vif with a dhcp address and all 3 can talk to the outside world and each other (my "flat network"). What I want is a tiered network with the first domU acting as a firewall with 3 nics vif = [