similar to: Why did I need strange ceiling settings? (full version)

Hello. I have a 1024/256kbit ADSL and tried to shape outgoing traffic in order to improve latency. Here is my config. UPLOAD_RATE="256" UPRATE="$[4*$UPLOAD_RATE/5]" (a little smaller) UP70="$[7*$UPRATE/10]kbit" UP30="$[3*$UPRATE/10]kbit" UP20="$[2*$UPRATE/10]kbit" UPRATE="${UPRATE}kbit" IF="eth2" IPTABLES="iptables -t

Hello, I''ve been trying to shape the bittorrent traffic (on my external interface, upload), but without luck, for this I''m using layer7 filter right now, but I''ve also tried ipp2p, with the same results, I might say that this is not a problem with this packet classifiers, the problem is with HTB, here''s why. When I open azureus (the bittorrent client I

Hi, is there a way to use my Belkin F6H650 on the USB port? I already installed usbhid-support, but neither the hidups worked (reports "/dev/usb/hiddev0 is not a UPS") nor genericups with upstype=7 and the hiddev set as device ("ioctl TIOCMSET: Invalid argument") worked. I have installed the debian sarge package of nut 2.0.1 (2.0.1-4) Regards, Philipp

Hello, some days ago, I was asking for help here about not able to do anything when I had bittorrent running, I will post the problem here: I''m using ipp2p to mark p2p packets, and then send them with -j CLASSIFY to the correct HTB class, I see traffic in the class when I start azurerus, and traffic does get shaped, but then I''m still not able to surf the web nor chat nor

Ok, earlier I post a message explaining my problem with HTB and layer7 (or ipp2p), about not being able to shape the traffic. Well, actually this is what''s happening, I''m marking the packets (right now, I''m using ipp2p as Klaus adviced me to) with iptables, and my queue rules are made using tcng, I''m using the HTB qdisc, and traffic is going to the HTB class

Hi all, I recently installed traffic shaping on my ADSL line with a nominal upload rate of 1MBit. My Modem says it has an upload bitrate of 843 kbits. So I thought, to use a ceiling of 800kbit for the root qdisc is a good idea. But with that setting I only achieved upload rates of around 300kbits whereas I reached around 650 kbits without traffic shaping. Yesterday I played a little with the

--- On Wed, 05 May 2004 14:01:28 +0100 "Andy Furniss" Wrote: > I forgot to say - if you use DSL tweaking uprate right upto the limit > with bulk traffic may not be a good idea. There are atm overheads and > thay are greater (as %) for small packets eg. htb counts empy ack as 40 > bytes but it''s 106 on wire. If people start gaming (30 small pps up > each)

I have read the thread at http://mailman.ds9a.nl/pipermail/lartc/2006q1/018287.html and still don''t know how to fix this problem. It appears alot of work has gone into it but the HOWTO is so out of date it doesn''t even begin to addresses this method. So here are my questions 1. what is the current state of these patches? are they in a specific version? do i have to patch myself?

does anyone know a way to shape outgoing/upload traffic per ip? I have a network and i want to limit the upload with 100kbit per user. Ex: 192.168.1.20 ----> 1024kbit-DOWN / 100kbit-UP 192.168.1.21 ----> 1024kbit-DOWN / 100kbit-UP and so on....... Ive tried CBQ and HTB, but couldnt get is right. the only thing that I did in upload bases was: "tc qdisc add dev ppp0 root tbf rate

As seen on my post at: http://www.sveasoft.com/modules/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?p=28112#28112 This works very well... It does NOT work with stable 4.0! sveasoft will be issuing a bug fix for this (4.1) in the near future. Final Rev of working script w/ asterisk support I'm not going to run alchemy on production machines until it is stablish. Remember to set your uplink properly and to set

Hi All, I'm stumped on a weird problem. I have an * server working fine for local SIP phones and IAX2 connections. We just provisioned a second Ethernet port to attach to a local SIP provider. PSTN calls incoming work fine: PSTN -> SIP Provider -> SIP -> * but outgoing calls are not. Call setup takes place and the caller can hear about 1-2 seconds of audio before the SIP provider

Philipp Leusmann wrote: > > Ok, I tried this and my results seem to bet he same as reported. Then I > think I=B4ll have to stick with the windows-driver at least on my main > machine.=20 > Or is there anything I can help to fix this driver? I don't know why we can't read anything from this device. There are many ways in which one could make a buggy device that works with

I think someone tried this recently, although I cannot find the post any more. It may be helpful, but it is not guaranteed that we will find anything. Could you please keep the discussion on the mailing list? Thanks, -- Peter Philipp Leusmann wrote: > > Wouldn't it help to sniff usb-communication with the windows driver? > > Philipp > > > -----Urspr=FCngliche

I have searched google and came up with too many options and packages that may or may not work for my needs, most articles seem to be for setting up routers. Maybe someone on the list can give me some better insight. I have monitoring turned on my "shift eight (tm)" (Asterisk ;-)) box for all calls. We have over one hundred agents and tons of recordings in wav format. I also

OK, here it is. Near perfect bandwidth calculation for ADSL users. Patch iproute2 with the HTB stuff and then this: It''s still a hack (as far as I can tell) because we are patching the rates tables, and hence I think it is only loosly coupled with the actual calculation of bytes in each bucket. However, it works very nicely for me! I have only been lightly testing with

i am trying to do some traffic classification using the PRIO qdisc and i am having a few problems. I have a root htb class: tc qdisc add dev imq0 root handle 1: htb default 255 r2q 1 tc class add dev imq0 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 768kbit and a child PRIO tc class add dev imq0 parent 1:1 classid 1:99 htb rate 96kbit ceil 600kbit prio 0 tc qdisc add dev imq0 parent 1:99 prio tc filter

Hi all, this is really not really very easy to understand, or, to get in. Well, I''ve the following configuration on the router box: LAN - interface: eth0 - network: 192.168.2.5/24 - bandwidth: 100Mbit/s INET interface - interface: ppp0 - network: .dynamic.ip./0 - bandwidth: DOWN=1536kbit/s and UP=256kbit/s the LAN interface is to serve 6 other clients with internet and

Hi, I have problem with this simple script: #!/bin/bash if [ "$1" == "del" ]; then tc qdisc del dev eth0 root handle 1: htb default 10 exit fi tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb default 10 tc class add dev eth0 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 800kbit ceil 900kbit tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:1 classid 1:10 htb rate 300kbit ceil 600kbit tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:1

Hello all This is my first posting for some years. I am back using R again and must say I do like the language (regarding scripting, I also use matlab, perl, and bash). My question involves plotting a Pareto frontier in three dimensions. This is strictly a exercise in visualization, I make no attempt to extract the Pareto set (aka dominating subset) first. EXAMPLE PLOTS For some example

Hi, I''m having issues with policing my incoming traffic by matching packet marks made by iptables. I''ve checked as many sites and guides as I can find, and I seem to be doing the exact same thing as they all are, but there''s still no success. As such, I was wondering if anyone can have a quick look to see if I''ve done anything obviously stupid? Essentially, I