similar to: Looking for new ideas to improve linux router performace

I''m looking for a way to shape all traffic on a virtual vlan interface, say eth1.100 to a max of 100mbit. The box is a quagga router with eth0 on the inside and vlan interfaces on the eth1 card to our upstream partners. Each partner has his own vlan on eth1. I tried shaping but was only able to shape outbound traffic on the eth1.100 interface. Inbound shaping was also possible, but

Hi. I got this on today's RELENG_6 with Broadcom BCM5722 A0, ASIC rev. 0xa200. >From dmesg (bge related): bge0: <Broadcom BCM5722 A0, ASIC rev. 0xa200> mem 0xe8400000-0xe840ffff irq 16 at device 0.0 on pci2 bge0: firmware handshake timed out, found 0x4b657654 bge0: firmware handshake timed out, found 0x4b657654 bge0: EEPROM read timed out bge0: failed to read EEPROM device_attach:

Hello, I'm running Asterisk on a CentOS 64-bit server. . Asterisk if I compile using the ./configure --libdir=/usr/lib64 instead of ./configure have a relative gain performace.? Has anyone done any comparison? Is there any way in the compilation or even in settings that I can improve the performace of the asterisk? tks Eduardo -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was

Hello! Our company have 2 sun 7110 with the following configuration: Primary: 7110 with 2 qc 1.9ghz HE opterons and 32GB ram 16 2.5" 10Krpm sas disc (2 system, 1 spare) a pool is configured from the rest so we have 13 active working discs in raidz-2 (called main) there is a sun J4200 jbod connected to this device with 12x750GB discs with 1 spare and 11active discs there is another pool

On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 5:56 PM, Carlos Garces <carlos.garces at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi! > > I have some strange results on my test with nouveau drivers > > I'm using a old GeForce4 MX 4000 (NV18) with 128 MB. > > I have made 2 test. > > -The default configuration, using nomodeset without nouveau_vieux_dri.so > > $inxi -G > Graphics: Card: NVIDIA NV18

Hi forks: I've been testing SMB2 with samba 3.6.4 performance these days, and I find a weird benchmark that SMB2 write performance is slower than SMB1 in 10Gb ethernet network. Server ----------------------- Linux: Redhat Enterprise 6.1 x64 Kernel: 2.6.31 x86_64 Samba: 3.6.4 (almost using the default configuration) Network: Chelsio T4 T420-SO-CR 10GbE network adapter RAID: Adaptec 51645 RAID

Hi Xen Users, I''d like to run some performance tests with Xen. Are there some (sort of) standard test-cases or tooling? I''m thinking about using the Linux Test Project''s "Database Opensource Test Suite" (http://ltp.sourceforge.net) Does someone have any experience with this? Other recommendations? Thanks. Regards, Gábor

Hello, I am interested in some management-performance issues: 1st Scenario: A management tool (for example a webbased one) has the following process: - write in database - read with script (for example perl) data from db and write conf files - reload asterisk I was reading around in the mailing lists and people say reloading is stable. Now this tool has to manage 1000 clients so the conf

Hi! I have some strange results on my test with nouveau drivers I'm using a old GeForce4 MX 4000 (NV18) with 128 MB. I have made 2 test. -The default configuration, using nomodeset without nouveau_vieux_dri.so $inxi -G Graphics: Card: NVIDIA NV18 [GeForce4 MX 4000] X.Org: 1.12.4 drivers: vesa,nouveau (unloaded: fbdev) Resolution: 1024x768 at 0.0hz GLX Renderer: N/A

Dear GlusterFS Engineer, I have questions that my glusterfs server and fuse client perform properly on below specification. It can write only *65MB*/s through FUSE client to 1 glusterfs server (1 brick and no replica for 1 volume ) - NW bandwidth are enough for now. I've check it with iftop - However it can write *120MB*/s when I mount nfs on the same volume. Could anyone check if the

I have noticed a significant performance degradation using merge in 2.9.1 relative to 2.8.1. Here is what I observed: N <- 100000 X <- data.frame(group=rep(12:1, each=N), mon=rep(rev(month.abb), each=N)) X$mon <- as.character(X$mon) Y <- data.frame(mon=month.abb, letter=letters[1:12]) Y$mon <- as.character(Y$mon) Z <- cbind(Y, group=1:12) system.time(Out

After update the system now I use: Kernel 3.9.2 x server 1.12.4 nouveau 1.0.7 the xorg config are at: http://pastebin.com/2LUxLiVs It's the one installed by my distro, without any modification I have made 2 test. Normal boot Xorg at http://pastebin.com/reZdAXEF GLX Renderer is detected as GLX "Mesa DRI nv18 x86/MMX+/3DNow!+/SSE GLX" Same configuration with nomodeset Xorg log

Dear gluster experts, We have encountered a severe performance issue related to quota feature of gluster. My underlying fs is lvm with xfs format. The problem is if quota is enabled the io performance is about 26MB/s but with quota disabled the io performance is 216MB/s. Any one known what's the problem? BTW I have reproduce it several times and it is related to quota indeed. Here's the

I've got an odd situation that I need some advise on. I have two computers that I am planning to use as a cluster. I initially started with some left over Compaq Presairos with 667MHz CPUs. I loaded CentOS 4.3 and later updated to 4.4. Things ran normally, albeit slowly. I had an opportunity to upgrade to a pair of IBM Netvistas with 2.26 GHz CPUs, I did this by transferring the

Has anyone else noticed a significant zfs performance deterioration when running recent opensolaris bits? My 32-bit / 768 MB Toshiba Tecra S1 notebook was able to do a full opensolaris release build in ~ 4 hours 45 minutes (gcc shadow compilation disabled; using an lzjb compressed zpool / zfs on a single notebook hdd p-ata drive). After upgrading to 2007-05-25 opensolaris release bits

Hello, Queries: 1 - what is the best RAID (0,1,5,10,50) for server running very, very VM instances ??? 2 - and config of stripes/element sizes (32, 64, 128, 256, etc, KB) ?? 3 - in the configuration of VM, exit one difference in performance between image file (disk:/) or LVM partition (phy:/) ??? any URL or docs for read about this theme ? mmm.. it is all for moment. thanks -- -- Victor

TEST: ===== SAMBA STRESS OVER GIGABIT NETWORK: This is a simple Read/Write/Compare/Delete kind of test over the network via Samba. Multiple clients with multiple threads try to read/write/compare/delete(in a loop) a finite sized file (64K block size) over samba for a prolonged period of time in an effort to stress test the server. SERVER SIDE CONFIG: =================== ARCH: x86 OS: RHL AS

Hi all, I tried last week to do traffic shaping on a production system, object of the exercise was simply to throttle the outgoing traffic. tc qdisc add dev eth4 root tbf rate 300mbit burst 300kb latency 50ms But the server became rather instable, crashing repeatedly without anything in the logs. Can anybody spot glaring mistakes in the tc command above, or tell me what I should have done

I'm experiencing similar problems with a 3C996-T under 4.8-REL. In particular, connecting a 4.8-REL machine to a 5.1-REL machine leads to some interesting situations: I can do simple pings across the link, but ssh fails, and heavy pings crash the 4.8 machine. Similarly changing the interface configuration with ifconfig tends to crash the 4.8 machine (mtu, link0, up/down, etc). The

Dear all, Has anyone seen this before and can suggest a solution? I've got 3 sip clients behind the router, and they all register with Asterisk using the same IP address. Now, wenn all are registered, all the calls get routed to the client that registered most recently, but not to the correct client. Also, there seems to be some problems registering all 3 clients simultaneously. Could