Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "QoS HTB burst and cburst parameters-FLEX"
2005 Dec 14
2
HTB burst/cburst decremented by one
Hi all :)
If I set the burst/cburst parameter to, let''s say, 1500, the
command "tc -s -d class show dev eth0" says that the value is 1499b/8
instead of the (correct?) 1500b/8.
Is this right or am I doing anything wrong?
Many thanks in advance :)
Raúl Núñez de Arenas Coronado
--
Linux Registered User 88736 | http://www.dervishd.net
http://www.pleyades.net
2007 Oct 16
0
Determining burst/cburst HTB values
Hello.
I am wondering if the default (auto-computed) burst and cburst parameters are appropriate values for my application.
I have a 100 mbit interface which is connected to a 16 mbit uplink.
I am sharing this bandwidth into a set of partitions (tc classes) defined as follows:
root class [1:1]
|
2005 Jul 13
6
tbf initial burst
I am using tbf to do bandwidth limitation. i found that when i start passing traffic there is a burst and then the rate goes down to what is configured. is this a known issue or do i need to change some parameters?
thanks.
---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Read only the mail you want - Yahoo! Mail SpamGuard.
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
2005 May 06
3
QOS monitoring?
Hi,
I have implemented QOS classifiers using TC with HTB. The
classification is working.
I would like to know whether there is some tool which will help me in
monitoring the bandwidth share of the various classes.
Thanks,
Vinod C
2004 Nov 18
5
burst question
This is one of my test classes:
class htb 1:10 parent 1:1 prio 0 quantum 2048 rate 160Kbit ceil 400Kbit
burst 1803b/8 mpu 0b cburst 2111b/8 mpu 0b level 0
Q1: where does "level 0" stand for?
Q2: where does this b/8 stand for?
Q3: this is on a i386 platform, so timer resolution should be 10mS.
According to the doc the minimal burst should be 10mS*160Kbit=1600. Why
is it 1803?
Q4: I
2005 Nov 04
4
Latency/burst problem with HTB
Hi all :)
I''m new to this list, as I''m new too to traffic shaping ;) I''ve
set up an FTP server in my ADSL line and I wanted it to serve as fast
as possible as long as I don''t use my outgoing ADSL bandwidth, and
I''m currently using HTB for that (succesfully, I must add).
The problem is (when the FTP server is serving higher than its
2005 Jul 30
2
Qos wiht HTB for ADSL/Home
Hi,
My home setup is as following:
- 1024/128 kbit ADSL
- FC3
I set up HTB to prioritize traffic. I am not very pleased with the
obtained results.
The scope of my setup is to have some ssh sessions with remote servers
while browsing websites and running aMule Nothing complicated (I
think... ;).
The very high priority traffic (ssh), gets stuck when I start aMule and
make an FTP download.
2013 Sep 27
1
Strange results with QoS definition
2002 May 23
1
BURST and CBURTS on HTB.init 8.3
why the exemple in the htb.init of the BURST e CBURST comes with values if the dafault is computed?
Is it better to put these values manualy?
How can I calculate the values?
2006 Sep 27
1
HTB root rate allowing to much of a burst
Please see below
Jon Flechsenhaar
Boeing WNW Team
Network Services
(714)-762-1231
202-E7
-----Original Message-----
From: Flechsenhaar, Jon J
Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2006 10:30 AM
To: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl
Subject: FW: [LARTC] 2.6.14 - HTB/SFQ QoS broken?
Please see below
Jon Flechsenhaar
Boeing WNW Team
Network Services
(714)-762-1231
202-E7
-----Original Message-----
From:
2004 Jul 19
1
QoS for Voip.
Thanks for the tips Brian,
Actually, I have many sorts of links, line PPOE ADSL, PPPOA ADSL
which a use PPTP over PPOA relay, radio links that connect in the
ethernet interface and cable modems.
To change the SFQ queue size I must recompile de kernel? I think a
saw some messages talking about that.
One other thing, I have the 1:10 a 1:20 class, let''s assume there
is no
2004 Aug 03
0
ceil, cburst, prio not working?
Hi, I''ve been using htb fine to separate outgoing SMTP traffic from HTTP
traffic so sending big emails doesn''t affect browsing. As long as ceil
== burst and the sum of all rates don''t exceed the root class'' rate all
is fine but when I incorporate ceil I would expect (from lartc howto)
that when other classes are idle the remaining bandwith would be
assigned
2005 Nov 14
6
Transfer speed exceeding the ceil
What''s going on here? I''m spewing UDP traffic at this thing, and it is
exceeding the ceil. Anyone know how to fix this?
class htb 1:613 parent 1:5 leaf 613: prio 6 quantum 2560 rate 20480bit
ceil 103360bit burst 15Kb/8 mpu 0b overhead 0b cburst 1728b/8 mpu 0b
overhead 0b level 0
Sent 16591370 bytes 4159 pkt (dropped 39449, overlimits 0 requeues 0)
rate 412384bit 6pps backlog 0b
2005 Dec 27
9
2.6.14 - HTB/SFQ QoS broken?
Hello,
First of all, I already contacted Martin Devera, the developer of HTB, and
he told me to search for help on this mailinglist, thus I am describing
my problems here now...
I am kind of seriously annoyed by QoS as I have been trying for over 3 years
to get it working properly - first I did not understand how it works, then
it seemed not to work, then it was working perfectly for half a
2005 Apr 06
4
Games and QOS on share connection line
Hello. I''m newbie with QoS. I read some articles and I have a question on You. If you have time to spare, it would be great
if you reply. Here is my problem. I''m on wireless network(no earnig comunity). We got 2/2Mbit(soon 4/4) for 100 people(sharing link). Not long ago people start
screaming that their games don''t work good(lagging). So I add to our qos class games
2007 May 11
1
HTB and bursts
2005 Nov 15
1
UDP transfer speed exceeding the ceil by about 4x
A bit more detail.
I have the following htb classes set up...
class htb 1:356 parent 1:4 leaf 356: prio 4 quantum 1600 rate 12800bit
ceil 51680bit burst 15Kb/8 mpu 0b overhead 0b cburst 1663b/8 mpu 0b
overhead 0b level 0
class htb 1:357 parent 1:4 leaf 357: prio 4 quantum 1600 rate 12800bit
ceil 51680bit burst 15Kb/8 mpu 0b overhead 0b cburst 1663b/8 mpu 0b
overhead 0b level 0
class htb 1:2 root
2004 Apr 06
11
htb2 -> htb3 problems
Hello!
I need to switch from htb2 to htb3, because of speed issues (for me,
htb2 is unable to handle more then 100mbit duplex with ~550 classes),
kernel profiling shows htb_dequeue_prio at 1st place with 3x isolation.
So, I''ve moved from 2.4.19 to 2.4.25 kernel (hi-pac for classification/marking
and htb3 for queueing), and traffic rate drop from 100 to 20mbit.
What can be wrong? The
2004 Jul 20
3
Fw: HTB - Really Big problem
----- Original Message -----
From: Michał Joachimiak
To: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl
Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2004 3:45 PM
Subject: HTB - Really Big problem
Hello everybody!
Since week i dig lists and www and can''t find solution for my problem.
I''m using HTB 3.13 kernel 2-4-25 smp iptables 1.2.9.
I''ve got situation like this:
LAN------Linux Box(routing only)------- Linux
2006 Mar 05
2
ATTN Andreas Klauer: ASCII art + comments, please?
Andreas,
Since I understand your ASCII art and comments, I would very much
appreciate it if you would draw what you see and criticize the
following. Hopefully I''ll better understand after that!
TIA,
gypsy
tc qdisc add dev imq0 root handle 1: htb default 20
tc class add dev imq0 parent 1: classid 1:2 htb rate 4522kbit ceil \
4760kbit burst 16k cburst 16k quantum 1500
tc class add