similar to: SIP and RTP QoS rules

Hello, I’ve read this Article avout VOIP and HFSC http://automatthias.wordpress.com/2006/06/30/hfsc-and-voip/ I’ve got few questions ? Considering this tc class add dev $DEV parent 1:1 classid 1:2 hfsc \ rt m1 ${UPLINK}kbit d 50ms m2 $[1*$UPLINK/10]kbit \ ls m1 ${UPLINK}kbit d 50ms m2 $[3*$UPLINK/10]kbit \ ul rate ${UPLINK}kbit rt = realtime curve ls = linksharing curve but m1 = ? m2 = ? d =

hmm HFSC ? where can i find more informations and examples about the *linux* HFSC ? http://trash.net/~kaber/hfsc/ does not help here -- _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

Hello I''ve setuped a bridge with iptables + layer + ipp2p + tc I don''t know how to shape passive ftp ? If I put rules on port 20, 21 or using layer 7 iptables accounting still empty ... When I done a tcpdump I can see that othe port than 20 or 21 are used ... Any Ideas of how I can achieve this ? Regards

Hello, I''ve setuped an ethernet bridge on a debian sarge 3.1 with l7-filter + ipp2 shapper rules The server is a supermicro p4sci + celeron pentium 4 base 3ghz + 512Mb + 2 ethernet e1000 One interface is connected to a cisco catalyst switch The other interface is connected directly to a CMTS (a sort of router for cable modem) configured as bridge too. More than 20Mbps of bandwith

Hello, I''ve got somes questions about Bridge and QOS ... I''ve got a serveur with 2 interfaces eth0,eth1 inside br0 bridge ... nothing of special ... If I understand all, normally I should configure TC class and qdisc on each physical or use ebtables to manage packets on output ... right ? I''ve attached my qos_script that hsfc and layer7 module. I use only Iptables

Hey folks, I stumbled across the Mastershaper project ( http://www.mastershaper.org/ ) but I have a little problem: I wanted to shape the traffic coming from the router itself aswell as coming from the LAN behind the router, for that task I need IMQ, but with IMQ iptables-(layer7)-matching is not possible. Now I''ve talked with the programmer and he said the following: >The problem is

Hello, I have finally managed to understand HFSC up to a level which allowed me to create a QoS script which maintains low VoIP latency while running stuff like eMule. Unfortunately, HFSC seems to have a severe bug. Why do I consider this as a bug defenitely? Well, my script runs without any errors, then QoS works perfectly for some hours, no error messages in kernel log. Then randomly the

hi all, long time since i posted on the list. just wondering if anybody has played around with hfsc and if so could he/she share their info on it thanks adrian -- To mess up a Linux box, you need to work at it; to mess up your Windows box, you just need to work on it. _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl

Hopefully someone has a suggestion on how I might do this...as I can''t figure it out :( I need to be able to set up a group of seperate users who have a "bandwidth pool" they share, but also be able to limit their individual bandwidth as well. Example: I have 5 customers and would like to be able to provide them with a maximum of 256Kbit each, with a CIR of 33%. To do this,

Hello I''ve setuped a bridge with l7-filter and ipp2p. We have every day + or - between 10Mbits and 30 Mbits P2P traffic from + or - 450 customers. When traffic increase. I''ve got this kind of error message : Feb 23 14:26:19 gestor1 kernel: printk: 38 messages suppressed. Feb 23 14:26:19 gestor1 kernel: ip_conntrack: table full, dropping packet. The server is celeron

Hi, I''m trying to get a handle on hfsc. Here is my configuration: root@jmnrouter:/jmn# tc class show dev vlan1 class hfsc 1: root class hfsc 1:1 parent 1: ls m1 0bit d 0us m2 225000bit ul m1 0bit d 0us m2 225000bit class hfsc 1:10 parent 1:1 rt m1 191000bit d 25.0ms m2 135000bit ls m1 0bit d 0us m2 135000bit ul m1 0bit d 0us m2 225000bit class hfsc 1:20 parent 1:1 rt m1 22008bit d

Hello I''ve setuped a QOS bridge under debian 3.1 using 2.6.18.3 kernel + iptables 1.3.6 I''ve patched the kernel an Iptables with esfq+layer7 without problems. This simple script doesn''t log nothing ... And I''m sure to have eMule traffic (I''ve checked with tcpdump ) If I remove " -m layer7 --l7proto edonkey \" line I can see

Hi there! I am currently setting up a Xen box on 3 VLans, each VLan interface is in a bridge and currently, dom0 is reachable from on of these and is performing great. My only problem is with domU : it can ping anything but it won''t work for TCP and UDP protocol UNLESS I do a manual tcpdump on my vlan interface. Bridges on dom0: xen-vl97 8000.001372529fbf no

Hello, First I want to point out that I''m not so familiar with HFSC, since there not so much info online. But here is my script: ${TC} class add dev ${LAN_IFACE} parent 1:0 classid 1:1 hfsc ls rate 100mbit ul rate 100mbit ${TC} class add dev ${LAN_IFACE} parent 1:1 classid 1:2 hfsc ls rate 90mbit ul rate 90mbit ${TC} class add

I have to match my packets based on MAC address, which I cannot do in the POSTROUTING chain, so I do it in PREROUTING using MARK. Then, I match on the MARK in the POSTROUTING chain to do a CLASSIFY. But this does not seem to work: wireless-r1 bwlimit # iptables -L -v -n -t mangle Chain PREROUTING (policy ACCEPT 3353K packets, 941M bytes) pkts bytes target prot opt in out source

G''Day I would like to be able to use my VOIP telephone over a saturated ADSL link whilst enjoying optimum audio quality and utilising all of the bandwidth I pay for. It is about this situation that I write. HFSC appears to be the queueing discipline of choice for VOIP. In order for this to work, though, do I have to account for the ATM overhead in the small VOIP packets by defining my

Hello, I''m using Linux kernel 2.6.x and tc (from iproute2 package). I''m trying to use HTB or HFSC scheduler in order to limite the rate of outgoing packets and also in order to minimiez delay for RTP stream. But I didn''t suceed in having this 2 QoS services working. I use Iptables in order to classify packets. Here is my HFSC conf. In fact the pings that i send from

Hi, I''ve just installed an openldap 2.3 inside a debian etch domU. Openldap is very very slow with db4.2, 4.3, ... and I dont'' why ??? I''ve updated my libc6 to a friendly xen version too ... but nothing ! I''ve found a post about this issue http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-users/2006-02/msg00179.html Any ideas to solve this issue ? Regards

Hello, I have a Fedora server, part of a domain, on which various shares are configured. For one share, I want to set up permissions according to the groups to which the users belong. But it doesn't work. For example, I want the share to be accessible by group A in read-write mode, and group B in read-only mode. I use setfacl for this. But neither group A nor group B have access to the

Hi, A thought for the list. As I mentioned in another posting, there are a lot of QoS mechanisms out there. Linux supports some, but not all. Some patchsets add others, but don''t work for all kernels. There are also userland implementations, usually sitting in software routers, but there are other packages. Would it be helpful if I worked on a table of what''s out there for