similar to: Standlone Shaping

On a router, there is no need for and IMQ because there is always an egress path. For example: Internet -> eth1 -> iptables -> routing -> ... -> egress qdisc -> eth0 -> LAN LAN -> eth0 -> iptables -> routing -> .... -> egress qdisc -> eth1 -> Internet Local Process / Proxy -> routing -> iptables -> egress qdisc -> eth1/eth0 ->

Hi, We currently have ESFQ running on an old Fedora machine and i'm trying to build a new router with something similar using CentOS 5.5 The problem is that it seems by default the CentOS is not compiled with TC ESFQ or TC filter hash flows I get the following error: Unknown filter "flow", hence option "hash" is unparsable How can i add support for the hash flow

Hi, i´ve read about this problem but i didn´t find any solution. I have a router with nat like that: internet - eth0 - Router - eth1 - Lan I made a htb script for shaping outgoing in eth0 and it works great. The problem begin with the incoming traffic... Like other people said, when somebody in the lan uses the tipical download accelerator, the line is out because the bandwidth is divided by

Since I admin the gateway for a network of bandwidth-greedy machines, I figured that esfq with "hash src" would be a more fair allocation of bandwidth than sfq. Unfortunately, there didn''t seem to be a recent patch for 2.6, so I endeavored to build one. The three patches I made (described below) are available within the attached tar.bz2 or at: http://fatooh.org/esfq-2.6/ 1. I

hi list, i''m about to setup traffic shaping on a server and got some small questions about the setup. i read alot of docs/howto''s but there are still some questions i''d like to ask. setup on the box is: - external if is ppp0 (dsl) - internal if in eth0 (with ~15 nat''ed boxes) - openvpn at tun1 since all ppl on the lan feel like they have to use p2p i decided

Hi, I''ve just changed my debian preseed configuration to install the debian unstable package of puppet v0.22.1. As part of the preseed I have a late command that clobbers the /etc/init.d/puppet file into using the puppet standalone program and not the puppetd (as this is what I''m using). Since the upgrade to 0.22.1 every boot hangs during the initd. Going into standalone mode

Hi. I would like to ask you for advice. I am trying to construct following shaping solution: * several users are using one link to the Internet * all of them have equal priority and should be given fair amount of bandwidth * no kind of traffic is considered more important than other * our Internet connection has no CIR, only "maximum dl/ul speeds" given by provider * most important:

Hello, I haven''t been keeping up with sending ESFQ [ANNOUNCE] messages to this list, but I''ve still been working on the patch. If you''re curious about recent changes, take a look at the home page, ChangeLog, and README: http://fatooh.org/esfq-2.6/ http://fatooh.org/esfq-2.6/current/ChangeLog http://fatooh.org/esfq-2.6/current/README Meanwhile, I''m interested

I applied esfq patch to kernel then I have applied iproute2-2.2.4-now-ss001007-esfq.diff to patch iproute2 (tc utility, iproute2-ss010824) source: http://www.ssi.bg/~alex/esfq/ But whenever I try to add esfq qdisc with parameter it says it donot know the qdisc i.e esfq. tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 1:13 handle 13: esfq perturb 34 quantum 1514 depth 25 divisor 23 limit 34534 hash src

Hi, I''m have a linux router like this: ADSL modem-->(eth0) Linux Router (eth1)<--->LAN (6 hosts) Since I want to apply fairness to 6 hosts LAN, I have compiled kernel 2.4.20-8 with patch esfq 0.2 (and iproute2 with patch esfq too.) Next, I run folow script: -------------------------------------------- #!/usr/bin TC="/sbin/tc" $TC qdisc del dev eth1 root 2>

Basically, I''m trying to crop multiple images out of a remote/original scene.. Think flickr ''tagging'', only, the pixs in the tagged boxes become their own unique images.. by way of simulating an upload from the controller using attachment fu.. can''t quite figure out the specific method in fu that would allow me to do this.. I''m so near the edge right

ESFQ''s original hashing algorithm never worked particularly well for the src or dst hash types: close IP addresses, such as 10.0.0.1 and 10.0.0.2 often hashed to the same number, even with many different perturbation values. This prevented the src and dst hash types from working adequately with small and medium-sized network ranges. A while ago, I added the src_direct and dst_direct hash

In a recent thread on this list, Robert Kurjata provided me a patch to add hashing by iptables mark to the Linux 2.4 version of ESFQ. Thanks to that contribution, I was able to easily add support to the 2.6 port I maintain. I found out, however, that the existing hash algorithm results in a lot of colllisions when the range of hashed values is small. The purturbation spreads the collisions out a

Hello, there''s a problem I''ve had for several months now, and I''ve never been able to find an answer to it. I''ll try to explain as quick as possible: I have a server that controlls my home network, it provides internet to them also (NAT) and I would like to provide QoS by shaping traffic. I have a p2p server here (running mldonkey), since only that

Hello, First I want to point out that I''m not so familiar with HFSC, since there not so much info online. But here is my script: ${TC} class add dev ${LAN_IFACE} parent 1:0 classid 1:1 hfsc ls rate 100mbit ul rate 100mbit ${TC} class add dev ${LAN_IFACE} parent 1:1 classid 1:2 hfsc ls rate 90mbit ul rate 90mbit ${TC} class add

On 5/27/05, gypsy <gypsy@iswest.com> wrote: > > > Yeah, I know what it means. > > Where did you get your esfq patch from? I downloded it from http://www.ssi.bg/~alex/esfq/<http://www.ssi.bg/%7Ealex/esfq/> What kernel version? If your kernel is 2.6 then get this patch: > http://kem.p.lodz.pl/~peter/qnet/ <http://kem.p.lodz.pl/%7Epeter/qnet/> > >

http://fatooh.org/esfq-2.6/ http://fatooh.org/esfq-2.6/esfq-2.6.12-rc1.tar.gz This version no longer interferes with the original SFQ; unlike previous versions, you can still use an unpatched tc with SFQ. Patching tc is still needed for ESFQ, though. I''ve tested this patch with Linux 2.6.11 as well. Please tell me if you have any problems. I''m subscribed to lartc again. -Corey

Hi, It is exactly what I need except one thing. I don''t know exactly if my router is the right place to apply QoS policy. It has two network interfaces and both are 10Mbit/s. The slow part of the network is little bit more far. On their QoS we have 2Mbit and I want all our users to divide this bandwidth equally but also don''t want to unnecessarily restrain their bandwith and to

Hi. On Mar 12, Corey Hickey posted here(http://mailman.ds9a.nl/pipermail/lartc/2004q1/012038.html) an updated esfq patch for kernel 2.6. Has anyone backported it to kernel 2.4 ? Original esfq patch is not being kept in sync with kernel sfq, it seems. What people have been using with esfq and kernel 2.4.25, the original 2002 esfq patch ? Rubens

Hello list. Yesterday i ask Corey Hickey (maintainer a patch for the original SFQ - http://fatooh.org/esfq-2.6/) about ESFQ perspectives and got your answer: > I do not intend to develop ESFQ any further, since I now maintain a > patch for the original SFQ. As for getting that merged into the kernel, > that will probably happen eventually, but I haven't had much time or >