similar to: Where is the returning connection?

I was trying the following setup with IPIP tunnels, one that used to work through another ISP, but no longer... Internal network | Linux box 1 (kernel 2.2.24) iif=10.0.0.1, extf=a.b.c.d, tunf=172.16.0.1 | |local metropolitan network | Another Linux box 2 (kernel 2.2.17, or 2.4.19, same result) iif=irrelevant, extf=x.y.z.v,

Hello people: I''m new in the forum. I''ve implemented the script for load balancing of "Linux Advanced Routing & Traffic Control HowTo" and I''ve a question: When I run the next command : "ip route" I get the folowing information: -------------- 192.168.0.32/27 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.0.33 192.168.0.96/27 dev eth2 proto

I don't know what's changed, but four SPA841s and a SPA3000 are no longer answering when they get an inbound call from *. This has been a working configuration for weeks. I *have* been fiddling with the server config; however, the configuration is under version control and I've reverted everything to exactly how it was when the server was working. Doesn't fix it. I reset one of

Hi, I have a linux server running kernel 2.6.19 that is connected with 2 seperate 100Mbit links to the same isp: +---+ +---------------+ | I | +---------------+ | | | S | | | | eth0 --+--------------+ P | | |

I wonder if someone can tell me what these ''unknown'' remarks mean in my status file. They are only in the last portion of the file and are listed below. If they mean nothing, I will rest easy. But if not it means I need to fix something. Your thoughts would be appreciated. ---------------- udp 17 92 src=24.224.173.220 dst=24.222.0.75 sport=1027 dport=53 src=24.222.0.75

I have 2 DCs at a customer that also run ISC-Kea-DHCP servers. To be able to provide DHCP-Leases I added virtual interfaces to the servers with IPs in each VLAN. In turn there also exist routes to the VLANs: # ip r default via 10.0.0.254 dev enp0s31f6 onlink 10.0.0.0/24 dev enp0s31f6 proto kernel scope link src 10.0.0.230 10.100.40.0/24 dev enp0s31f6.200 proto kernel scope link src

Hello All, I took a break from trying to get Tinc working and have come back to it now with the release of 1.0.11. I have 2 Windows computers connected behind firewalls and everything seems to be correct, except I cannot seem to get any data past the server TAP interface. I can ping the Server TAP interface from the client, but no data will move through the TAP interface to the Internet. I have

Folks, I'm having trouble connecting to my Samba server. The immediate symptom is that I cannot see my Samba server in my Windows Network Neighborhood, and so I cannot connect to it to check my share connections. I'm running SUSE 9.3 on the server, which is running Samba (3.0.22) , a dhcp server (which seems to be running correctly--everyone gets an address when they ask for one),

Hello Tom and others on the list. Tom - you might recall that the other day (night) I had problems with my axip setup (protocol 93) and we made some changes to the policy, zones and interfaces files. You added ''peers and tunl+'' Following that change nothing seemed to work. In fact you wanted to see the shorewall status file, among other things. Well - tonight, I carefully put

Hi all, I''m trying to set up a computer with 2 routes to the internet, much as described at http://lartc.org/howto/lartc.rpdb.multiple-links.html .One of my interfaces (eth5, 192.168.2.2) is only used for traffic originating inside the network. The other (eth1, 192.168.1.2) is only used for a VPN, where all (udp) traffic originates from outside our network. I have created a second

Hi all, I try to receive an ipv6 address for my PPP link via autoconf (against Cisco machine), but there is a problem I'm unable to solve so far. I can see cisco's Router-Advertisement containing prefix etc., but no IP adress is assigned to tun0 interface. Anyone succesful in IPv6 over dial-up PPP connection? When I manually assign IPv6 address, connection works. My system is

Hi, I have a network with three different sites, each with their own workgroup, each on their own subnet, connected by a VPN. Each site has a master samba server, acting as a domain master and wins server. Each site has a mixture of Windows (mostly 2000 professional) and linux workstations on each workgroup. I am trying to get all workgroups and all machines viewable in 'network

Dear List. I try to build multipath connection w/ load balance to internet with two different gateway; My system is RH-8.0 with iproute-2.4.7-7.90.1.rpm and Kernel-2.4.26 (patching with Julian A. patch),and follow guide from http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/~julian/nano.txt, The problem is; when i try to connect to Internet form gateway machine it;s success , but only one interface is

Is there any point in running NetworkManager on a server? The IP addresses of the two server NICS are fixed (192.168.1.2 and 192.168.2.2 .) I'm not clear if it is necessary in some way to run NM on a CentOS system? -- Timothy Murphy e-mail: gayleard /at/ eircom.net tel: +353-86-2336090, +353-1-2842366 s-mail: School of Mathematics, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland

I have a 2.6.12(ubuntu-patchset), kernel recompiled with this routing options: [*] IP: advanced router [*] IP: policy routing [*] IP: equal cost multipath Load balancing is working great, but i have problems whits long term tcp flows (like msn-messenger or vpns or any other type of long term ip based conection). I assume this is because after a period of time, the per-host

Hi all :) I have a masqueraded home lan as well as a friend of mine. I have set up two tinc daemons on both masquerading gateways and I have no trouble connecting (it works pretty smooth) and they show up in the syslog as configured after sending an USR1 / USR2 signal to the daemons. The trouble is the routing / firewalling of the packets. Maybe somebody could give me a hand here? :) The

Dear Sir, I have point-point ethernet connections to my linux boxes on which I am running Zebra OSPFD. I am unable to understand the output of the tcpdump. Please clarify the terms in the output. The output of the command tcpdump on BOX 1 is as follows: I have also shown a part of my network below. 14:0831.849801 eth0 M 192.168.2.2 > 224.0.0.5: OSPF v2-hello 48: rtrid 192.168.4.2 backbone

i'm getting the following error message from smbclient when doing tar backups. what exactly does this error message mean and how can i eliminate it? ERRDOS - ERRbadshare (The sharing mode specified for an Open conflicts with existing FIDs on the file.) opening remote file \windows\system32\config\software.LOG -- Todd Pfaff \ Email: pfaff@mcmaster.ca Computing and

Am 24.02.19 um 16:51 schrieb Brian Davis via samba: > On a machine with virtual networking is enabled and two ether net > controllers eth0/192.168.1.2 and eth1/192.168.1.3 and having SAMBA smb.conf > set to: > > dns interfaces = lo br0 > > is there a chance for: > > 1) The system not to boot with DNS working > 2) The DNS server bounce between eth0 and eth1 > 3)

Hi, I've been debugging this for a day now and I am on the edge of my understanding and could use some help. I have a smbd 3.5.6 running as a PDC (smb.conf below) with an openldap backend. If I run `getent passwd` I get all the users (local and Domain) and computer accounts that I've imported into the ldap tree. If I run `getent group`, I only see local groups: root:x:0: daemon:x:1: