Displaying 20 results from an estimated 3000 matches similar to: "Xen and tc problems"
2007 Jan 17
1
restricting bandwidth using TC
Hello,
I am trying to get the TC command to work on our debian box to limit
traffic in and out to 12 Meg. The command I am using is:
tc qdisc add dev eth0 root tbf rate 12000kbit latency 25ms burst 1600
tc qdisc add dev eth1 root tbf rate 12000kbit latency 25ms burst 1600
The problem I am having is that the bandwidth exceeds the 12 Meg by
almost 5 Meg.
Any help is appreciated.
2005 Nov 06
1
tc qdisc replace failing
Hi,
Having issues getting a replace command working correctly. The error reported
is "RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument" which isn''t descriptive or helpful.
The command i''m running is:
tc qdisc replace dev ppp0 parent 8001:D handle D: tbf rate 5Kbit burst 5kb
latency 70ms
The idea being to replace an sfq with handle D and hopefully limit a certain
user in my
2005 Jul 22
2
tc filter matching anything
Hey,
I have a problem adding a filter matching anything, here is my setup:
###############
tc qdisc add dev eth0 handle 1: root prio
tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 1:1 handle 10: pfifo
tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 1:2 handle 20: tbf latency 50ms rate \
128kbit burst 256kbit
tc filter add dev eth0 protocol ip parent 1:0 prio 1 handle 666 fw \
flowid 1:2
tc filter add dev eth0 protocol ip parent
2007 Aug 11
1
tc and multiple ip on a device
Hi,
i''m sort of testing a configuration and things are not working sa i
planned.
i have the following network diagram: PC1 to 7 cnneced on the same
ethernet hub.
PC1 PC2 PC 3 PC4 PC5 PC6 on network 192.168.5.0
PC6 and PC7 on network 192.168.1.0
so PC6 work as a router. in addition, PC6 is connected to both
network on the same device eth0.
now on PC6, put a tbf on dev eth0 root
2005 Apr 06
3
tbf latency problems!
Hi i have found a problem related with tbf and the
latency that the tbf calculates.. I have used the
following parameters for burst and limit
burst 100Kbit limit 500Kbit lat81.8ms
burst 6Kbit limit 6Kbit lat 0us
burst 200Kbit limit 100Kbit lat 4294.9s
As u can see in the 3rd column the latency for 100Kbit
burst and 500Kbit limit is 81.8ms but for 200Kbit and
limit 100Kbit is 4294.9s!!! How
2007 May 10
6
PRIO and TBF is much better than HTB??
Hello mailing list,
i stand bevor a mystery and cannot explain it J. I want to do shaping and
prioritization and I have done these following configurations and
simulations. I canĀ“t explain, that the combination of PRIO and TBF is much
better than the HTB (with the prio parameter) alone or in combination with
the SFQ.
Here are my example configurations: 2 Traffic Classes http (80 = 0x50) and
2004 Jun 25
1
TBF maximum bucket size
I''m trying to fill a token bucket with enough tokens to burst several gigs
of data. However, it doesn''t seem to get any higher than ~3.9GB:
>tc qdisc add dev eth0 root tbf rate 1440kbit latency 50ms \
burst 16000000000
>tc qdisc show dev eth0
qdisc tbf 800b: rate 1440Kbit burst 3908420240b lat 2197.8s
A smaller attempt of ~1.6 gigs works just fine:
>tc qdisc
2003 Dec 08
1
tc troubles with pfifo_fast qdisc on 2.4.23 kernel
Hi!
I was updated kernel from 2.4.22 to 2.4.23
and now tc tools can''t correctly determine default (pfifo_fast) qdisc on interface:
# tc/tc qdisc ls dev ppp0
qdisc pfifo_fast 0: [Unknown qdisc, optlen=20]
but, if I assign f.e. cbq qdisc for some device all show correctly:
# tc/tc qdisc ls dev ppp1
qdisc tbf 8009: rate 32Kbit burst 10Kb lat 1.5s
qdisc cbq 66: rate 10Mbit
2002 Dec 31
3
[tcng] More complex example?
Hi
I''m completely stuck with the tcng language - I assume there must be
some way to arrange queues hierachically like
eth1
|
TBF
|
PRIO
/ \
class class
but my attempt (below) produces a "inferno.tc:8: qdisc "tbf" has no
classes near "prio"" when run through tcc.
dev eth1 {
egress {
tbf (rate 128kbps, burst 64kb,
2005 May 05
1
TC breaking Virtual network connection
Good afternoon,
I am a newbie to lartc. I have read the HOWTO. I set up a CBQ traffic control using the following commands, and it caused my VNC connection to break frequently.
=======================================================================
**CBQ: cbq-1280.My_shaper
/sbin/tc qdisc del dev lo root
/sbin/tc qdisc add dev lo root handle 1 cbq bandwidth 20Mbps avpkt 1000 cell 8
/sbin/tc
2003 Apr 04
1
iproute question
Hello all,
My company is sharing it''s internet access with a neighbor and the neighbor
in question was eating our bandwidth (both in upload and download) most of
the time. I finally set up a linux router to limit the incoming/outgoing
bandwidth to his network by adding a tbf on eth0 interface and eth1 interface
of the router (neighbor is behind eth1 and we are in-between him and the
2005 Aug 02
2
internet traffic from tbf
Hi have set the following tbf
tc qdisc add dev eth0 root tbf rate 0.5mbit \
burst 5kb latency 70ms peakrate 1mbit \
minburst 1540
I want to add a filter so the ip traffic pass from
it.. plz help me
__________________________________
Yahoo! Mail
Stay connected, organized, and protected. Take the tour:
http://tour.mail.yahoo.com/mailtour.html
2005 Jan 11
3
Need help regarding TBF Token rate setting
Hi,
I would like to know how to specify the token rate when a tbf qdic is created using tc tool.. Will it be
a default value when tbf qdisc is created?
This could be a silly question.... im quite new to all these stuff.. but im really interested..
any help will be most appreciated...
thanks in advance,
sanjeev
--
______________________________________________
Check out the latest SMS
2007 Aug 22
6
simple tbf rate clamping issues
Hello,
I was attempting to throttle egress traffic to a specific rate using a
tbf. As a starting point I used an example from the LARTC howto, which
goes:
tc qdisc add dev eth1 root tbf rate 220kbit latency 50ms burst 1540
I then attempt a large fetch from another machine via wget (~40 megs)
and the rate was clamped down to about 12Kbytes/s. As this seemed too
much, I gradually increased
2001 Feb 02
2
TBF settings
I presently use TBF with this syntax:
tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 1:100 tbf buffer=15000/8 LIMIT=30000 MTU=1500
parent class is a cbq with rate=128Kbit
when I want to add PEAK, I get always RTNETLINK error: Invalid argument. Maybe be I don''t understand this parameter. What I know about it, it''s that it can control short-term burst traffic, and it''s what I need to do.
2005 Nov 14
1
Using TBF to throttle a PC to 5kbps
Hi Everyone,
This is a simple question but I don''t understand why the below tbf is not
working as expected by throttling traffic to 5kbps
If I throttle a PC''s traffic using the below when traffic exceeds 5kbps
packets start getting dropped (as they should) but all traffic gets dropped.
not just the bit over 5kbps.
TC="tc add dev ppp0"
$TC parent 8001:2 handle 2:
2005 Jul 20
1
TBF + burst
I am using tbf to do rate limitation. i set the rate,
burst and latency parameters for tbf. but when i start
passing data i notice that there is an initial burst
and then the rate goes down to the configured level.
is this because tbf starts with a full bucket?
thanks.
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection
2002 Aug 30
1
TBF to limit bandwidth, Should I change #define HZ?
Dear friends,
thanks for the last advices about TBF.
After reading the tbf.pdf document I got a better insight of the problems I
had trying to limit the bandwith on my testbed with a high resolution.
The question I have now is:
Would I get an immediatly better resolution result if I change the #define
HZ to 1000 for my Linux box? I have a Pentium Celeron 700 MHz, and I would
like to see the tbf
2005 Feb 16
5
Compiling sch_tbf.c in user space
Hi,
I am new to kernel programming.
My task is to route packets from different hosts
through one single token bucket filter as we are
trying to model a wireless scenario with many hosts
communicating and sharing the same bandwidth.So the
idea we came up with was to route packets from
different hosts to user space using Netfilter and then
send them through a common tbf implemented in user
space in
2006 Feb 23
3
userlevel should not need to know about HZ?
Kernel people tell me users should never need to know the value of HZ
used by the currently running kernel. One kernel hacker even told me
that Linus once changed the value from 100 to 1000 just to see user
space programs break.
However, it is needed for the buffer parameter in TBF. The tc-tbf(8)
manpage:
If your buffer is too small, packets may be dropped because more
tokens arrive per timer