similar to: acs_as_taggable : easy tagging with Rails

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 40000 matches similar to: "acs_as_taggable : easy tagging with Rails"

2005 Sep 06
9
acts_as_taggable v4 - Tag Counting Anyone?
There´s already a new version of the acts_as_taggable mixin available and look what it is capable of now: # Gets the top 10 tags for all photos Photo.tags_count :limit => 10 # => { ''beer'' => 68, ''wine'' => 37, ''vodka'' => ''22'', ... } # Gets the tags count that are greater than 30 Photo.tags_count :count =>
2005 Sep 03
13
acts_as_taggable v2 - Tagging on Steroids
Hi folks, Thanks to the community feedback on the 1st version, I''ve come up with a much improved version of the acts_as_taggable mixin. There´s some piece of the action here: http://dema.ruby.com.br/articles/2005/09/03/tagging-on-steroids-with-rails Cheers Dema -- http://dema.ruby.com.br - Rails from a .NET perspective
2005 Aug 16
3
Rails Docs in CHM format
Hi Folks, For the Windows Railers, I''ve made the Rails docs available as a CHM file: http://dema.ruby.com.br/articles/2005/08/16/rails-docs-in-chm-format Cheers, Dema -- http://dema.ruby.com.br - Rails from a .NET perspective
2005 Sep 06
6
strange behavior of acts_as_taggable
I was testing my models with this new library and I got: >> s.tag "warp" ActiveRecord::StatementInvalid: ERROR: inserción o actualización en la tabla «tags_stories» viola la llave foránea «tags_stories_story_id_fkey» DETAIL: La llave (story_id)=(8) no está presente en la tabla «stories». : INSERT INTO tags_stories ("tag_id", "story_id") VALUES
2005 Jun 27
9
FK constraints overrated?
Hello folks, I use to think that a relational databases without foreign keys constraints enforced strictly by the RDBMS were no good, piece of crap, data junk. However, I''ve also learned the hard way that FKs constraints imposes serious difficulties when moving data around, specially between different DBs, or for loading test data or for upgrading DBs schemas, or for porting DBs
2006 Sep 12
1
acts_as_taggable -- which one?
There appear to be three acts_as_taggable implementations and I''m looking for a recommendation on which to use. - Gem - DHH plugin - Dema mixin The Gem implementation appears to be obsolescent, from what I can read on the lists and Google search. I like that the DHH plugin uses polymorphic associations because there will be lots of different taggable items in my application; however,
2005 Jun 08
7
Rails/lighttpd: Changes to controller not being seen?
This is a weird one: My app works fine on our local box with webrick. After uploading to TxD server, the app starts behaving weirdly. I make some edits to one of the controllers and my changes don''t seem to be going through. So I go ahead and change the name of the controller file. The page loads without error. I figure maybe I''m in the wrong directory, so I change the
2005 Sep 13
5
acts_as_taggable 1.0.4 now gemified!
Hi Folks, The acts_as_taggable mixin is now available as a shiny gem. More details here: http://dema.ruby.com.br/articles/2005/09/13/acts-as-taggable-gemified This release features some cool additions as well. Cheers Dema -- http://dema.ruby.com.br - Rails from a .NET perspective
2005 Dec 15
2
Rails Tagging Generator?
Hey all! Just finished my first Rails app on 1.0 day and even got paid for it! Great stuff and much thanks to the many generous souls in IRC, especially ezmobious, who helped me through. For my second Rails app, I want to use tagging. I am wondering if there is a Tagging Generator or some other existing implementation I can borrow from? Best, Mike Pence Boca Raton, FL
2006 Jan 19
0
Rails with Apache - application failed to start
Hi, I followed the instructions in the article http://dema.ruby.com.br/articles/2005/08/23/taming-fastcgi-apache2-on-windows to make rails work with apache: Install Apache2, latest stable version Install the latest Ruby Installer for Windows Install the latest Ruby For Apache In httpd.conf I have: FastCgiConfig -maxClassProcesses 1 -maxProcesses 1 -minProcesses 1 -processSlack 1 \ -initial-env
2004 Dec 15
4
AR db adapter for a RDF database (ATT: DHH)
Hi people, As I stated in a earlier message, I am using Rails on my masters degree and soon I will have to port my application from a relational database (MySql) to a RDF semantic database called Sesame. At first, I thought that I could get away with most of the porting only by writing a decent database adapter, but then, examining AR closer, I could see that it has some strong dependencies
2005 May 23
16
Success - Rails, FastCGI, and IIS / Windows Server
About 17:00 localtime I managed to get fastcgi, Rails and IIS all happy together. Upon success I ripped off my clothes and ran through the village yelling "The future is now!". A PDP-11 geezer stuck his head out a window and said "The future isn''t what it used to be and keep yer shirt on". Modifications were required to dispatch.fcgi and request.rb. The following
2005 May 01
5
Example using Builder::XmlMarkup and .rxml files?
Greetings, I''m a newby to both "R"s in RoR. I would like to use Builder::XmlMarkup to generate my pages. If there is a working downloadable example somewhere, that would probably be enough. Otherwise, here''s what I want to do: With the following controller: class AccountsController < ApplicationController layout ''accounts'' model :account
2005 Dec 23
6
Stories with many tags, tags with many stories, has_and_belongs_to_many howto?
Hi, I began experimenting with habtm relationships, and so I created a stories table, a tags table, and a stories_tags table referencing the former 2. When I create a "story", I want to add several tags to it. Then, the model should create those tags and link them to the respective stories, and for the tags that already exists, just link them to the story. I tried something like
2005 Dec 30
0
XP Apache FastCGI ok if RAILS_ENV="", crash when RAILS_ENV="production"
Dears, Thanks to Demetrius (dema.ruby.com.br, see Taming FastCGI) I''ve a running FastCGI Rails 1.0 environment with : - Win XP "Professional" (just brand name) - Apache 2.0.55 (msi) - Ruby for Apache 1.3.1 - Database backend is now Oracle 8.1 Everything run fine with default environment, I''m confused for switching into ''production''. By default
2009 Mar 25
0
surplus <p> tags.
I've run into a problem with multimarkdown, and would like advice: From Fletcher's doc: > > Unlike PHP Markdown Extra, all definitions are wrapped in <p> tags. First, > I was unable to get Markdown not to create paragraphs. Second, I didn?t see where it mattered - the only difference seems to be aesthetic, and I > actually prefer the <p> tags in place. Let me
2005 Mar 01
0
Tagging Flac-files in GNU/Linux and Windows
--- "Oskar L." <oskar@rbgi.net> wrote: > I am having a lot of problems with tagging FLAC-files. I edited the > tags > in XMMS (in Linux) using the FLAC plugin, version 1.1.o. Playback > worked > fine with that setup, but when I played the files on my other > computer, > again with XMMS, but with version 1.1.1 of the FLAC plugin, the ä and > ö > characters
2006 Apr 08
3
FastCGI issues
I am attempting to get Rails running on Windows with an Apache 2 server. I seem to be having some trouble, and in spite of my best efforts to find a solution, I could not. I believe that I configured Apache correctly. I have included EnableSendfile Off EnableMMAP Off Win32DisableAcceptEx FastCgiConfig -maxClassProcesses 1 -maxProcesses 1 -minProcesses 1 -processSlack 1 \ -initial-env
2006 Jan 01
4
rails under windows and mysql make webrick unstable
hi, I have installed ruby and rails under windows(exactly this one: http://rubyforge.org/frs/download.php/4174/ruby182-15.exe that includes rubygems) the thing is that while trying to install the mysql gem, it seemd to try to build the native extension, so I finally added a compiled version that I found in http://dema.ruby.com.br/ the problem is that webrick behaves quite unstable while
2003 Jul 04
1
Concerning 'tagging proposal'
Hi, It is my opinion that a 'tagging standard' which aims to cater to everyone, caters to noone. Tagging style ultimately depend upon tagging tastes; I personally think it would be unwise to try to match everybody's tastes. Now, having a 'tagging proposal' instead of a 'tagging standard,' hardly seems worth the effort, to put it mildly. I doubt anyone would want to