similar to: Absolute Maximal Bandwidth

Hi I''m completely stuck with the tcng language - I assume there must be some way to arrange queues hierachically like eth1 | TBF | PRIO / \ class class but my attempt (below) produces a "inferno.tc:8: qdisc "tbf" has no classes near "prio"" when run through tcc. dev eth1 { egress { tbf (rate 128kbps, burst 64kb,

Hi all I started playing with tcng to generate my tc rules, but I have some difficulty implementing my rules... The script below generates an error: # Device eth0 tc qdisc add dev eth0 ingress beginner.tc:2: don''t know how to build meter for this The script is below, I changed the real IP numbers for XXs and YYs, since it doesn''t really matter what they are. eth0 is the

Hi I''m looking for a quick recipe for a newbie to control http traffic in my linux gw. My internet is overloaded already and vpn external clients are experiencing troubles (disconnecting in peak hours). Any suggestions ? Regards Guillermo Caracas/Venezuela On Thu, 2004-05-06 at 14:40, lartc-request@mailman.ds9a.nl wrote: > Send LARTC mailing list submissions to >

Thank you for your help. It generates this script : tc qdisc add dev eth0 handle 1:0 root htb default 2 tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:0 classid 1:1 htb rate 75000bps ceil \ 75000bps tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:0 classid 1:2 htb rate 125000bps tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1:0 protocol all prio 1 u32 match u32 \ 0xa000001 0xffffffff at 12 classid 1:1 But I thought it was necessary to

Hi all, Can someone please help with a tcng setup? I have played with tc and tcng in the past, and now would like to get some serious rules in place. However, I have a difficulty in setting them up. My setup is as follows: One machine working as a firewall: eth0 is the interface connected to a 512K DSL line eth1 is connected to a LAN eth2 is connected to another LAN, a bit like a DMZ eth1 and

Hi all, The following ingress statement: .... $host2 = SLB(cbs 1024kb, cir 2048kbps); class(<>) if ip_dst == 81.175.84.2 && SLB_else_drop($host2); .... is compiled by TCNG into the folling tc command: ... tc filter add dev eth0 parent ffff:0 protocol all prio 1 u32 match u32 0x51af5402 0xffffffff at 16 classid ffff:0 police index 505 rate 256000bps burst 131072 mpu 0 action

Hi, I wanted to configure the following : 1. VPN + some other special connections (TCP 82,8282,23,22 and ICMP) to have priority over the rest 2. special upstream for our updating system on port 4000 3. within the VPN tunnels citrix traffic ( TCP 1494, 2598) + icmp has priority I need this for both incoming and outgoing traffic as it is the bandwith managment config on a central system from

I''ve been having a bit of difficulty with a hierarchy of HTBs that I''m wanting to create. Essentially, I''ve got one interface that goes to both the DMZ and the internet. When going to the internet, some of the traffic will be going through a VPN and therefore I want to prioritize it differently, however I want to give the DMZ traffic full speed as long as it

Hi, We are using kernel 2.4.24, tcng version 10b. I''m trying to do some policing in the ingress queue of the internet device. Until now we had configured some filters dividing traffic into queues, and on these queues the Double Leaky bucket meter was applied. The idea is to have a minimum of bandwidth assigned per class (the cir values) and a maximum (pir values), just as with the

Hello Mailing list, I have a problem with the prio qdisc and I don´t know what is wrong in my configuration This ist a sample configuration and looks like this: #include "fields.tc" #include "ports.tc" #define X16(i) i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i dev ppp0 { dsmark { prio(bands 6, priomap X16($be)) { class if ip_proto == IPPROTO_UDP;

Hello all, I am trying to set up a simple htb based system, where packets with source ip 10.0.0.1 should have their own class. I plan to use tcng to set it up easier. Is there something wrong in my tcng file ? ~/tcng$ cat htb /* */ #include "fields.tc" #include "ports.tc" dev eth0 { htb ( ) { class ( rate 600kbps, ceil 600kbps ) {

Hello mailing list, i stand bevor a mystery and cannot explain it J. I want to do shaping and prioritization and I have done these following configurations and simulations. I can´t explain, that the combination of PRIO and TBF is much better than the HTB (with the prio parameter) alone or in combination with the SFQ. Here are my example configurations: 2 Traffic Classes http (80 = 0x50) and

Hey all, i have a class. class ( <$call1> ) if ip_dst == 10.100.1.6 && tcp_dport == 22 if ip_src == 10.100.1.4 && tcp_sport == 22 ; Now when i apply this traffic TO 6 on port 22 is indeed limited to the speed i specify BUT it doesn''t seem to take the src into account at all. If i change the src to anything, even an address that

I can''t seem to match packets less than 512 bytes: class( <$bulk> ) if tcp_dport == 81 && !( ip_len & 0xfe00 ) ; or if tcp_dport == 81 && ip_len < 512 Both rules match any packet I send to port 81, even when the total IP length is much greater than 512 bytes: class htb 2:4 parent 2:1 leaf 5: prio 1 rate 8000bps ceil 24000bps burst 6Kb cburst 1839b Sent

Hello, I have this user that lost an email, even when the server is set up to do lazy expunge. The mail server logs show that the message was received, the user also read it and he did reply to it. here is the mail.log Jun 29 07:52:48 mx20 postfix/smtpd[19289]: 0ACD81C443B: client=usxsl050.slb.atosorigin-asp.com[199.6.139.15] Jun 29 07:52:48 mx20 postfix/cleanup[20259]: 0ACD81C443B:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi all, I'm trying to wrap my head around the Director and how it works, but I'm not having much luck finding documentation. Currently, I have two front end mail servers that use NFS for mail storage. I'm using Cisco's SLB for load balancing, though I may switch over to a server-based load balancing solution at some point. SLB

Newbie here... tcng version 10b I''m just learning about htb and using tcng. I am trying to make the example in Martin A. Brown''s Traffic Control with tcng and HTB HOWTO v0.5 example 2 /* * Simply commented example of a tcng traffic control file. * * Martin A. Brown <mabrown@securepipe.com> * * Example: Using class selection path. * * (If you are reading the

Hi all, It is my understanding that with HTB, the rate and the ceiling are divided over the elements of the class. E.g. using a rate of 100 kb and a ceiling of 2000 kb for a class with 10 elements on a 100Mb NIC, the effect of the ceiling will be that if all elements are generating their maximimum possible trafic they will be effectively limited to ~ ceiling / number of elements, in this case

Hi list, Is it possible to have NFS based load balancing and failover enabled storage without stacking switches? Or is this only doable with iSCSI and multipathd? I''m reading about XenServer and openvswitch, how multiple VMs would be able to use all physical links using SLB bonds, it works for networking but not for storage? (As the nfs share is mounted on dom0?) Using openvswitch

Hi. We have had SAMBA running successfully at work here for a while, it's on a Sun Sparc Solaris 2.6. The version of samba is 2.0.0. Unfortunately our sysadmin has left the company, and I have to try and fix a problem with Samba. When I try and start samba, "nmbd" starts ok, but "smbd" doesn't start. When I check the log files, I get these errors: [2001/09/24