similar to: prio not seeming to work

I''m trying to configure 4 queues with strict priorities based on DSCP. I tried to following commands, but it seems that the filters I defined have no effect tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: prio bands 4 tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 1:0 handle 10: pfifo limit 100 tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 1:1 handle 20: pfifo limit 100 tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 1:2 handle 30: pfifo limit 100 tc

I can use DSMARK to mark on the Egress side. Is there a way to mark/change the DSCP value of an incoming packet on the ingress side? Thanks. Jon Flechsenhaar Boeing WNW Team Network Services (714)-762-1231 202-E7

Hello, I''m using a script with tc, to limit my outgoing traffic : tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb tc class add dev eth0 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 500kbit burst 6k tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1: protocol ip prio 1 u32 match ip dst 172.28.54.9 flowid 1:1 I want to test bandwidth with iperf to see if limitation is correct. Sometimes, I get correct measure for certain rates,

Hi! I am studying HTB. I used the topology showed below: 10.1.0.1 ------ 10.1.14.25 (eth1) / 192.168.10.10 (eth0) ----- 192.168.10.11 (host 1) (router) (host 2) All machines use Debian Etch. Has a Iptables masquerading rule to eth1 in the router machine . The NICs are 100 Mb/s. The host 1 has Apache 2 and a file with 670 MB (CD ISO image) to download. When I used

Dear all, I''m making a script to implement DiffServ policies with HTB. Here it is : if test $1 = "help" -o $1 = "h" -o $# != 5 then echo "usage: ds.sh <DEVICE> <DS_RATE> <EF_RATE> <AF_RATE> <BE_RATE>" exit fi DEV=$1 DS_RATE=$2 EF_RATE=$3 AF_RATE=$4 BE_RATE=$5 sync tc qdisc del root dev $DEV tc qdisc add dev $DEV root handle

Hi there! I''ve using HTB for a while and now I an faced with a ''problem''. How hierarchical is HTB? Let''s say I have this 3 layer HTB setup: root class 1: (rate=100, ceil=100) 1: children classes 1:10 (30,100) and 1:20 (70,100) 1:10 children classes 1:100 (10,100) and 1:101 (20,100) 1:20 children classes 1:200 (30,100) and 1:201 (70,100) I managed to have

Hi to all I am studying HTB on LARTC how to. I realize a simple configuration on router: tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb default 30 tc class add dev eth0 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 3mbit burst 15k tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:1 classid 1:10 htb rate 2mbit burst 15k tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:1 classid 1:20 htb rate 1mbit burst 15k tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 1:10 handle 10: sfq

All: I have been told that HTB_HYSTERESIS might have some effect on rate calculations. This file is usually in /usr/src/linux/net/sched/sch_htb.c. If I change this file I have to re-compile. I am not quite sure how to do this. Can someone list the steps necessary to re-compile or point me to a doc that explains how to do so. Thanks. Jon Flechsenhaar Boeing WNW Team Network Services

Hey everyone, For some reason my htb configuration isn''t allowing any class to burst up to its ceiling ever, even when the link is only being utilised by one class that class only ever gets its assigned rate and exactly that assigned rate... The hierarchy I have is 1: at the root with no default, then 1:2 and 1:3 under that, both with assigned rates, then 2: and 3: under those

Is there anyway to actually see packet stats or that packets are for sure going into a prio queue with TC? I can see all the HTB stats but the prio classes just list as being there...would like more information Basically I have the following setup DSMARK | HTB - (tcindex filter on TOS) | Prio (u32 filter on TOS) Thanks Jon Flechsenhaar Boeing WNW Team Network Services

Hi How can I control which filter a packet will meet first? I have tried changing the order of applying the tc filter scripts and switching flowid number, but ''protocol ip u32 match ip src <ip net> match ip src 0.0.0.0/0'' always kicks in first? >From my script -------------------- # All traffic - Priority: Low tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1:0 prio 2 protocol ip u32

Hello mailing list, i stand bevor a mystery and cannot explain it J. I want to do shaping and prioritization and I have done these following configurations and simulations. I can´t explain, that the combination of PRIO and TBF is much better than the HTB (with the prio parameter) alone or in combination with the SFQ. Here are my example configurations: 2 Traffic Classes http (80 = 0x50) and

Hi, I found that I had some thinking error with the wshaper script. I assigned the bandwith of my DSL connection to it, but the machine where it runs is normally connected to the LAN with 100Mbit behind a separate Hardware-Router.Obviously, the complete connection of the machine was slowed down to 384k because I told it so.I guess, since wshaper takes only one card as argument, I can''t

Hi, I''m trying to divide my bandwidth between different services, but I''d like to take into account the number of active users. For example, l want divide my bandwidth between HTTP and SMTP and guarantee HTTP 80% of the bandwidth. However, I have many users on my system (tens of thousands) and if only 1% of my active users are using HTTP (and the other 99% SMTP), I''d

Hi all, I''m having some problems setting up qdiscs on a bridge.The config looks a little like this: ifconfig ifb0 up # Bring up the IFB for this bridge. tc qdisc add dev eth2 ingress tc qdisc add dev eth3 ingress tc qdisc add dev ifb0 root handle 1:0 cbq bandwidth 100Mbit avpkt 1000 cell 8 # Raw qdiscs on each bridge port tc qdisc add dev eth2 root handle 1:0 cbq bandwidth

Hello What I''m looking for is how to configure the Linux QoS module to do global rate limitation for two (or more) 802.1q pseudo network devices. I naturally suppose there is a possibility with IFB. I don''t want to use IMQ because it''s not integrated to my kernel v2.6.21.1 and I didn''t find IMQ patches for it nor for the iptables package I use (v1.3.7).

Hi, I''ve failed miserably in my endeavours so far and I''m at the point where help would be much appreciated. I want to have 3 bandwidth limited classes on my Internet interface. In each of those classes I want 3 prioritization bands, and then use "tc filters" to place the traffic into the correct class and priority. The problem is that the traffic

Please see below Jon Flechsenhaar Boeing WNW Team Network Services (714)-762-1231 202-E7 -----Original Message----- From: Flechsenhaar, Jon J Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2006 10:30 AM To: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl Subject: FW: [LARTC] 2.6.14 - HTB/SFQ QoS broken? Please see below Jon Flechsenhaar Boeing WNW Team Network Services (714)-762-1231 202-E7 -----Original Message----- From:

hi to all, I''m studying traffic shaping using kernel 2.6.8 (debian sarge). well, I have this problem: priority doesn''t work. I try with: - qdisc prio: tc qdisc add dev eth1 root handle 12: prio bands 3 tc qdisc add dev eth1 parent 12:1 handle 13: tbf rate 10Mbit buffer 1600 limit 3000

Hello everyone! I''m simply trying to put a PRIO inside an HTB (used to throttle). I''ve got interactive traffic on the network that I want to give priority (VoIP + Citrix + Video). I''ve used the filters in a CBQ script fine, but am having trouble adjusting them to this setup such that they properly assign the traffic. tc qdisc del root dev $e tc qdisc add dev $e