similar to: Fixtures: pluraly bitten

Hi all, Rails 1.0 Postgresql 8.1 Ruby 1.8.4 Is there a way to reset sequences in unit tests when loading fixture data? I came across mention of a "Fixtures.reset_sequences method here: http://api.rubyonrails.com/files/vendor/rails/activerecord/CHANGELOG.html However, when I tried to call Fixtures.reset_sequences in the setup method, I got a NoMethodError. Any ideas? Thanks, Dan

Hello, I apologize if this has been asked before. I am interested in creating a helper for my view that generates a grid-style table. Here''s what I have in application_helper.rb: def print_grid_layout(items, table_class, num_columns) print %Q{<table class=''#{table_class}'' cellpadding=''0'' cellspacing=''0''>\n} rows =

Hi, [This is a repost, I can?t find where went my previous post, ] I wanted to create subdirectories in the fixtures directory in order to be able to manage many different initial states for my system (or to sort fixtures / corresponding model subpackages). I came up with the idea of writing: Test::Unit::TestCase.fixture_path = RAILS_ROOT + "/test/fixtures/selling"

Functional tests properly load fixtures, but my integration test chokes: # def self.create_fixtures(fixtures_directory, table_names, class_names = {}) # puts("fixtures dir: "+(fixtures_directory.nil? ? "nil" : fixtures_directory)) It''s only nil for my integration tests. I''m on rails edge. Does anyone know what I''m doing wrong here? 1) Error:

I have a page that has a dropdown which i''m using observe_field on to make an ajax call back to my controller. The page initially displays fine. The method is invoked in my controller when i select a choice in the dropdown and I have an rjs file which is then invoked. The rjs file looks like this: page.replace_html ''embed_calendar'', :partial =>

We have implemented calendar_helper.rb to generate an ajaxified calendar using rjs templates. Everything worked fine until we added a drop down to select the current month. Now when select a month and the calendar refreshes to that selected month we get a ton of ''\t'' displayed all over the page inside what looks like to be a javascript debug print statement ( try {} catch{} block

I noticed that in a case where I use Position.clone, the element with the cloned position is displayed somewhere off. My understanding of positioning is a bit shaky at times, but I think clone needs to take into account the scroll offsets as shown below. Michael var Position = { ... clone: function(source, target) { source = $(source); target = $(target);

I''d like to run the FastCGI as a different user than the Apache2 server (www-data on Debian). I take it this is possible in some way with suExec2, but so far I haven''t figured out how to do it. Michael -- Michael Schuerig Life is just as deadly mailto:michael-q5aiKMLteq4b1SvskN2V4Q@public.gmane.org As it looks

Anyone have any tips for handling postgres constraints when using fixtures to load the database, other than to sort out the proper insertion orders or leaving the constraints out? I''d prefer not to do the former since I''d rather use my app to generate my fixture data (using a dump_fixtures task) and I''d prefer not to do the latter because leaving out constraints till the

Am Donnerstag, den 20.03.2008, 15:44 -0700 schrieb Tanya M. Lattner: > Its not just a matter of checking major/minor versions. It also depends on > the target and in some cases the OS. > http://llvm.org/docs/GettingStarted.html#brokengcc > > So for example, GCC 3.3.3 on Suse or GCC 3.4.0 on linux/x86 > (32-bit) has issues. Is it easy to check these kinds of things? uname

Joachim Durchholz wrote: > Am Donnerstag, den 20.03.2008, 15:44 -0700 schrieb Tanya M. Lattner: > >> Its not just a matter of checking major/minor versions. It also depends on >> the target and in some cases the OS. >> http://llvm.org/docs/GettingStarted.html#brokengcc >> >> So for example, GCC 3.3.3 on Suse or GCC 3.4.0 on linux/x86 >> (32-bit) has

> I guess it could be done for things like 4.1.1 or a couple of others on > the list. This gcc version always worked fine for me on ubuntu linux (though it might have been 4.1.2, I don't recall). Ciao, Duncan.

Am Freitag, den 21.03.2008, 13:03 +0100 schrieb Duncan Sands: > Hi Joachim, > > > I have to report that the Ubuntu gcc-4.1 will fail. 'make' would run > > without giving more than a few warnings, but 'make install' will > > complain that it doesn't know how to build one of the intermediate > > targets and error out (some VMCore/tablegen file IIRC,

Am Donnerstag, den 20.03.2008, 15:27 -0700 schrieb Shantonu Sen: > llvm's ./configure already does that for gcc < 3. > > What are valid versions? Exactly 4.0 and 4.2? 4.0 and >=4.2? There's a list at http://llvm.org/docs/GettingStarted.html#brokengcc so there is a reasonable basis. The list isn't comprehensive, of course, and will likely grow in the future. OTOH

On Mar 20, 2008, at 3:00 PM, Joachim Durchholz wrote: > Hi all, > > I just forgot to ./configure with CC=gcc-4.2 CXX=g++-4.2, getting the > (broken-for-LLVM) gcc-4.1 as a compiler. > The error message that I got was this: > make[1]: Entering directory `/home/jo/llvm-wrk/lib/VMCore' > make[1]: *** No rule to make target > `/home/jo/llvm-wrk/Release/bin/tblgen',

>> I just forgot to ./configure with CC=gcc-4.2 CXX=g++-4.2, getting the >> (broken-for-LLVM) gcc-4.1 as a compiler. >> The error message that I got was this: >> make[1]: Entering directory `/home/jo/llvm-wrk/lib/VMCore' >> make[1]: *** No rule to make target >> `/home/jo/llvm-wrk/Release/bin/tblgen', needed by >>

Hi all, I just forgot to ./configure with CC=gcc-4.2 CXX=g++-4.2, getting the (broken-for-LLVM) gcc-4.1 as a compiler. The error message that I got was this: make[1]: Entering directory `/home/jo/llvm-wrk/lib/VMCore' make[1]: *** No rule to make target `/home/jo/llvm-wrk/Release/bin/tblgen', needed by `/home/jo/llvm-wrk/lib/VMCore/Release/Intrinsics.gen.tmp'. Stop.

llvm's ./configure already does that for gcc < 3. What are valid versions? Exactly 4.0 and 4.2? 4.0 and >=4.2? dnl Verify that GCC is version 3.0 or higher if test "$GCC" = "yes" then AC_COMPILE_IFELSE([[#if !defined(__GNUC__) || __GNUC__ < 3 #error Unsupported GCC version #endif ]], [], [AC_MSG_ERROR([gcc 3.x required, but you have a lower version])]) fi

Am Freitag, den 21.03.2008, 06:56 -0700 schrieb Shantonu Sen: > I recommend you don't parse version strings. In fact I switch the > check to use AC_COMPILE precisely for the reason that gcc --version is > totally unreliable and vendor specific. For example, what's the > regular expression that tells you what the GCC version is: > i686-apple-darwin9-gcc-4.0.1 (GCC)

I recommend you don't parse version strings. In fact I switch the check to use AC_COMPILE precisely for the reason that gcc --version is totally unreliable and vendor specific. For example, what's the regular expression that tells you what the GCC version is: i686-apple-darwin9-gcc-4.0.1 (GCC) 4.0.1 (Apple Inc. build 5470) (Aspen 5470.3) Per the rest of this thread, you can't