similar to: htb: rate bigger then ceil

Hello All, I have Samba 3.0 and 3.0.7 servers that have similar problem , the problem occures once a week ~aprox, all about 1 per minute samba server created smbd -D process with root ownership thats never die, the server stucks after about 200 such processes and I need to reboot it to release the stuck. There is someone knows why it happens Denis

Hi Alex, since I have no knowledge of the apcsmart driver, nor much time currently, I've forwarded your msg to the NUT development list. I hope somebody can take over your call. btw, please subscribe to the list for further discussions... 2007/5/28, Alex Brodsky <abrodsky at acs.uwinnipeg.ca>: > Hi, > > My name is Alex Brodsky, I am a faculty member at University of >

Hello, I''m having such problem with HFSC with following config: + tc qdisc del dev eth3 root + tc qdisc add dev eth3 root handle 1: hfsc default 2 + tc class add dev eth3 parent 1: classid 1:1 hfsc ls rate 512kbit ul rate 512kbit + tc class add dev eth3 parent 1:1 classid 1:2 hfsc ls rate 2kbit ul rate 400kbit + tc class add dev eth3 parent 1:1 classid 1:3 hfsc ls rate 32kbit ul rate

What''s going on here? I''m spewing UDP traffic at this thing, and it is exceeding the ceil, (i watched it for a few minutes, it didn''t slow down). Anyone know how to fix this? class htb 1:613 parent 1:5 leaf 613: prio 6 quantum 2560 rate 20480bit ceil 103360bit burst 15Kb/8 mpu 0b overhead 0b cburst 1728b/8 mpu 0b overhead 0b level 0 Sent 16591370 bytes 4159 pkt (dropped

Hi all, I have been getting some strange results with HTB in kernel 2.6.11, and was wondering if anybody could give me some advice. Also, if someone could direct me to the changelog for the recent versions so I can see if it is worth upgrading? Anyway, the problem can best be summed up by looking at the output of ''tc -s -d class show dev eth0''. Some of the relevant results

What''s going on here? I''m spewing UDP traffic at this thing, and it is exceeding the ceil. Anyone know how to fix this? class htb 1:613 parent 1:5 leaf 613: prio 6 quantum 2560 rate 20480bit ceil 103360bit burst 15Kb/8 mpu 0b overhead 0b cburst 1728b/8 mpu 0b overhead 0b level 0 Sent 16591370 bytes 4159 pkt (dropped 39449, overlimits 0 requeues 0) rate 412384bit 6pps backlog 0b

A bit more detail. I have the following htb classes set up... class htb 1:356 parent 1:4 leaf 356: prio 4 quantum 1600 rate 12800bit ceil 51680bit burst 15Kb/8 mpu 0b overhead 0b cburst 1663b/8 mpu 0b overhead 0b level 0 class htb 1:357 parent 1:4 leaf 357: prio 4 quantum 1600 rate 12800bit ceil 51680bit burst 15Kb/8 mpu 0b overhead 0b cburst 1663b/8 mpu 0b overhead 0b level 0 class htb 1:2 root

An earlier exchange about someone seeing the rate larger than the ceiling is posted below. Andy explained the reason for the "above ceiling" rate in Daniel''s output . . . but I just saw an example that doesn''t fit. >> tc output >> class htb 1:14 parent 1:1 leaf 14: prio 1 quantum 3072 rate 256000bit ceil 282000bit burst 1820b/8 mpu 0b overhead 0b

Who can send to me code that can perform in R-plus jacobi.root, scre.eq, cgf.0, cgf.1 and cgf.2 that are part of the S-plus package? Marc D. Brodsky

Hi, I am trying to write a script that will create a class and will add specific Ip address to that class. let me write commands: tc qdisc del dev eth0 root tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb default 12 tc class add dev eth0 parent 1 classid 1:1 htb rate 10mbit ceil 10mbit tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 1:1 sfq tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:1 classid 1:21 htb rate 128kbit ceil 128kbit tc

Hi I''m trying to understand this qdisc stats output: #tc -s qdisc ls dev [interface] [..] qdisc htb 1: r2q 10 default 13 direct_packets_stat 38 Sent 3867654734 bytes 7023775 pkt (dropped 4, overlimits 4852340 requeues 0) rate 0bit 0pps backlog 0b 11p requeues 0 [..] In all my qdiscs, I''ve got "rate 0bit". What does it mean ? As you can see, there is some traffic

SUBMISSION DEADLINE 20th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems Submission Deadline: October 18, 2017 http://www.iceis.org/ March 21 - 24, 2018 Funchal, Madeira, Portugal. ICEIS is organized in 6 major tracks: - Databases and Information Systems Integration - Artificial Intelligence and Decision Support Systems - Information Systems Analysis and Specification -

SUBMISSION DEADLINE 20th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems Submission Deadline: October 18, 2017 http://www.iceis.org/ March 21 - 24, 2018 Funchal, Madeira, Portugal. ICEIS is organized in 6 major tracks: - Databases and Information Systems Integration - Artificial Intelligence and Decision Support Systems - Information Systems Analysis and Specification -

SUBMISSION DEADLINE 20th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems Submission Deadline: October 30, 2017 http://www.iceis.org/ March 21 - 24, 2018 Funchal, Madeira, Portugal. ICEIS is organized in 6 major tracks: - Databases and Information Systems Integration - Artificial Intelligence and Decision Support Systems - Information Systems Analysis and Specification -

SUBMISSION DEADLINE 20th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems Submission Deadline: October 18, 2017 http://www.iceis.org/ March 21 - 24, 2018 Funchal, Madeira, Portugal. ICEIS is organized in 6 major tracks: - Databases and Information Systems Integration - Artificial Intelligence and Decision Support Systems - Information Systems Analysis and Specification -

SUBMISSION DEADLINE 20th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems Submission Deadline: October 18, 2017 http://www.iceis.org/ March 21 - 24, 2018 Funchal, Madeira, Portugal. ICEIS is organized in 6 major tracks: - Databases and Information Systems Integration - Artificial Intelligence and Decision Support Systems - Information Systems Analysis and Specification -

SUBMISSION DEADLINE 20th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems Submission Deadline: October 30, 2017 http://www.iceis.org/ March 21 - 24, 2018 Funchal, Madeira, Portugal. ICEIS is organized in 6 major tracks: - Databases and Information Systems Integration - Artificial Intelligence and Decision Support Systems - Information Systems Analysis and Specification -

I have to match my packets based on MAC address, which I cannot do in the POSTROUTING chain, so I do it in PREROUTING using MARK. Then, I match on the MARK in the POSTROUTING chain to do a CLASSIFY. But this does not seem to work: wireless-r1 bwlimit # iptables -L -v -n -t mangle Chain PREROUTING (policy ACCEPT 3353K packets, 941M bytes) pkts bytes target prot opt in out source

Hello I have a 64kbits link to location and I need to limit the traffic of a machine (10.200.0.86) to this location to ensure that this machine will no use all th bandwidth, and I did a rule to this situation where the machine has it bandwith limited to 10kbits if there is other traffic to this location, otherwise it can use up to 54 kbits. tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb ... tc

Hello! I am using shapping whith htb. My question is what are the propper values I can use in rate/ceil. I use htb.init for quick building of my classes/rules and have 2 groups of clients with 2 different bandwidth assignemet : A. 16--->48kbps B. 16---->128Kbps It seems to work everything OK, but can I use lower values for rate like 8Kbps ? What about using 32-->96Kbps? I let htb to