similar to: route to a host behind and ipsec tunnel

Hi Tom, Thanks for the feedback about my Shorewall evaluation I''ve published a blog today covering general things I''ve observed about the way to combine Shorewall with strongSwan: http://danielpocock.com/practical-linux-vpns-with-strongswan-shorewall-and-openwrt Please let me know if anything is inaccurate or if there is anything substantial that I missed and I''ll

On 2015-04-14 11:25, Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 04/14/2015 11:07 AM, Florin Andrei wrote: >> I looked in the yum repositories for CentOS 7 and I noticed that there >> are no packages for any of the major open source IPSec VPN apps - >> Openswan, strongSwan, etc. I'm pretty sure CentOS 6 had Openswan >> packages. > > libreswan replaced openswan, and is

2015-04-14 21:40 GMT+03:00 Florin Andrei <florin at andrei.myip.org>: > On 2015-04-14 11:25, Gordon Messmer wrote: > >> On 04/14/2015 11:07 AM, Florin Andrei wrote: >> >>> I looked in the yum repositories for CentOS 7 and I noticed that there >>> are no packages for any of the major open source IPSec VPN apps - >>> Openswan, strongSwan, etc.

And openvpn. Avoid ipsec as it's too complex and pptp is unsecure. Eero 4.4.2016 9.55 ip. "Richard Zimmerman" <rzimmerman at riverbendhose.com> kirjoitti: > SoftEther VPN > > Once setup, it just works.... > > Regards, > > Richard > > > --- > Richard Zimmerman > Systems / Network Administrator > River Bend Hose Specialty, Inc. > 1111 S

On 2015-04-14 11:44, Eero Volotinen wrote: > 2015-04-14 21:40 GMT+03:00 Florin Andrei <florin at andrei.myip.org>: >> >> http://serverfault.com/a/655752/24406 >> >> If that is accurate, the documentation, and the clustering / load >> balancing might tilt the balance in the direction of strongSwan. >> >> > Well, both packages can do ipsec to

I looked in the yum repositories for CentOS 7 and I noticed that there are no packages for any of the major open source IPSec VPN apps - Openswan, strongSwan, etc. I'm pretty sure CentOS 6 had Openswan packages. What is the current consensus w.r.t. building an IPSec VPN "server" (concentrator, whatever) on CentOS 7, that will do site-to-site connections with Cisco hardware at

On 04/14/2015 11:07 AM, Florin Andrei wrote: > I looked in the yum repositories for CentOS 7 and I noticed that there > are no packages for any of the major open source IPSec VPN apps - > Openswan, strongSwan, etc. I'm pretty sure CentOS 6 had Openswan packages. libreswan replaced openswan, and is available in the CentOS 7 repo.

Hello! My name is Egor Rukhvadze. I'm looking for a job in US as a UNIX/FreeBSD system administrator and/or network administrator that lets me utilize my experience in an Internet Service Providing (ISP). Name: Egor M. Rukhvadze. Birthday: April 13 1973. Contacts: Phone number: home +7 (095) 126-41-84 (8AM-1PM PST or 8AM-4PM EST). Cell: +7 (903) 792-31-53 e-mail: gara@mail.ru ICQ#

shorewall version 2.0.7 1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP> mtu 16436 qdisc noqueue link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00 inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo 2: eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,NOTRAILERS,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 1000 link/ether 00:30:48:53:25:b2 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet 81.169.188.152/32 brd 81.169.188.152 scope global eth0 3: eth1:

I have a centos 4 i386 machine that works like a router (iptables filter, NAT) with two NIC''s. One NIC is connected to my ISP (100 Mbit FTTH), I get a DHCP assigned public IP that changes "sometimes". Most incoming ports are blocked by my ISP. In order to get a fixed IP and open ports, I have to set up a PPTP tunnel to the ISP. The default gw and the NAT''ing goes to

Hi friends, I need help. I''ve PPTP Server running behind Shorewall. The PPTP server is working OK in my LAN, but I want to connect outside and It isn''t working. I''ve configurate shorewall like http://www.shorewall.net/PPTP.htm. I add only this lines in my rules DNAT net loc:165.182.15.15 tcp 1723 - IPext DNAT net loc:165.182.15.15 47 - - IPext It isn''t

SoftEther VPN Once setup, it just works.... Regards, Richard --- Richard Zimmerman Systems / Network Administrator River Bend Hose Specialty, Inc. 1111 S Main Street South Bend, IN 46601-3337 (574) 233-1133 (574) 280-7284 Fax -----Original Message----- From: centos-bounces at centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On Behalf Of david Sent: Monday, April 04, 2016 1:57 PM To: CentOS

Hi All, This is a general VPN question; PPTP VPNs seem to be very easy to set up with CentOS as the VPN server and the built-in windose client, but how do list members feel about the security vunerabilities reported with the MS implementation? Specifically the 6 problems reported here : http://www.schneier.com/pptp-faq.html or maybe im being paranoid? Would any of you roll this solution out

Folks I would like to have my windows 7 laptop communicate with my home server via a VPN, in such a way that it appears to be "inside" my home network. It should not only let me appear to be at home for any external query, but also let me access my computers inside my home. I already have this working using M$'s PPTP using my home Centos 6 gateway/router as the PoPToP server.

Hello! My name is Denis Shaposhnikov. I'm looking for a job in EU (Germany is preferably) as a UNIX/FreeBSD system administrator and/or network administrator that lets me utilize my experience in an Internet Service Providing (ISP). Skills: * Operating systems: UNIX (FreeBSD 2.2 - STABLE), Cisco IOS (10.x - 12.x), ZyNOS. Understand how systems work and is able to apply this

I am looking for the optimal VPN. Well it doens't have to be that elaborate. Just the best VPN. We currently have some customers using PPTP, some using openvpn, some using Cisco Any Connect and there are a few others. So my question is, if you have control of both ends (client and server) what is the best VPN to use? There are not too many requirements, but a big one is The VPN must return

Hi, just configured a shorewall-box with identical setting as a machine which works for passing pptp via dnat to an internal pptp server (win). Unfortunately we cannot establish a connection and tcpdump tells (from firewall to client) icmp: my_host protocol 47 unreachable [tos 0xc0]. What could I do now, to troubleshoot? We followed exactly the dnat settings in your docu. Thx Andy

I see support in shorewall for the KAME-tools, how about strongswan ? I have setup shorewall 3.4.4 and strongswan 4.1.3, making this my vpn-gateway for the subnet behind it. # Shorewall version 3.4 - Zones File #ZONE TYPE OPTIONS IN OUT # OPTIONS OPTIONS fw firewall fil ipsec mode=tunnel mss=1400 net ipv4

Hi, I''ve a gateway host (cali), connected to the Internet via ADSL and a PPTP tunnel (ppp0). I also have a IPIP tunnel to another host over the Internet (mytun), nothing fancy. This is working perfectly. But I want to give more priority to the IPIP packets coming OUT of the PPP (PPTP connection) interface. And I can''t get this to work. Class 2:21 is the one with high

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=663 Phil Oester <netfilter at linuxace.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |INVALID --- Comment #3 from Phil Oester