similar to: Bridging multiple vlans on linux router

Hi bridge list: Bart de Schuymer suggested that this question might be better placed on this list rather than in the ebtables area. So here it is : ================================================================= Hi listers: I am a relative Penquin Newcomer, and I am (therefore?) encountering problems trying to setup a simple bridge/firewall between two vlans sharing portions of the same

<I apologize if this arrives twice... I sent it first from an non-subscribed address, don't know if that'll get to the list or not --JJ> Hi folks, I have an implementation question regarding bridging on a linux box between a catalyst trunk port and a cisco 26something w/802.1q subinterfaces. So right now, there's no vlan trunking going on on the link my bridging firewall sits

Hi, This is really basic block level pass. It is no difference what is level, problem is the same. After fixing for asm parser, assembler syntax is no more valid for backend, without processing with asm parser. May be it will be solution to process inline asm on insn printer level to remove syntax fixes. But just switch it off without lto will make compiler do less job P.S. sorry for dup,

Hi, Imagine that your backend has valid asm instruction written like this: "%x mnem %y, %z" And user puts it as inline assembler: __asm__ ("%x mnem %y, %z"); It can not be parsed with current llvm asm parser, because it starts with % (moreover it has mnemonic in second place) Say you written pass, that makes it "mnem %x, %y, %z". Now this guy can be parsed, but

Hi, I'm using Vlans in my network as a way of preventing pier to pier communication - I only want nodes in the network to talk to the gateway (a linux box). I have successfully set up lots of sub interfaces using the vconfig too, one for each vlan. What I would like to be able to do is remove the ip address from each of these subinterfaces eth0.x and bridge them to eth0. I have successfully

Hi, In LTO we have AsmParser that process inline assembler instructions to MCInst and I want to fix some inline assembler in order to conform its rules (do not start with non-identifier and so on) because asm syntax of our backend allows some incompatible patterns. In order to do this I am adding IR-level target-specific pass. But those fixes shall not be applied when there is no AsmParser later

OK, strange request but I want to bridge three vlans under linux 2.4. Bridging works fine with two vlans, but is failing to route when I add the third vlan. Situation is clearly to have Lan, internet and DMZ vlans. The reason they are vlans is that I am using a Linksys WRT54GS and hence you effectively have a 5 port hub on the back which can be segregated into flexible vlan groups. I

I know this is not a normal request, but I would like to connect two vlans into the same box that have the same subnet on them, and then NAT them out to the Internet. We don''t need to make any connections inbound to them, but only provide outbound access. Any suggestions on how to do this? If I can''t do it with routing then I could use something like user-mode Linux, or other

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15252 Summary: X crashes on start with Geforce 7000M VGA Product: xorg Version: 7.3 Platform: x86-64 (AMD64) OS/Version: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Driver/nouveau AssignedTo: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org

After update I have got this: samba-tool drs kcc -Uadm2 -d 9 INFO: Current debug levels: all: 9 tdb: 9 printdrivers: 9 lanman: 9 smb: 9 rpc_parse: 9 rpc_srv: 9 rpc_cli: 9 passdb: 9 sam: 9 auth: 9 winbind: 9 vfs: 9 idmap: 9 quota: 9 acls: 9 locking: 9 msdfs: 9 dmapi: 9 registry: 9 scavenger: 9 dns: 9 ldb: 9 tevent: 9 auth_audit: 9

I''m attempting to put together a Xen box, which has multiple VLANs running into it, on one bridged interface. I mostly copied the way it was done here: http://renial.net/weblog/2007/02/27/xen-vlan/ I basically have: bond0 is the bond device (composed of eth0 and eth1), vlan757 is the vlan device for vlan 757 on bond0, and "xen757" is a bridge created by the above scripts,

hi, I have to configure Xen server and DomU''s which should be able to talk to different vlans - depending on services put on DomU''s. I would like to enslave 2 NICs via bond interface. Both NICs are on trunk ports which are configured in the same way, the same native vlan. I don''t know, if I have to add vlans tagging to eth* interfaces then enslave tagged eth*

Hi, Default register allocator tries to reuse the same registers over and over again even if register file have a plenty of registers to use. This creates parasite false dependencies and makes scheduling less effective. How to instruct allocator (may be override some virtual function in mine backend?) that it is profitable to use maximum number of available registers with minimal dependencies?

Hi, I regularly have errors (kernel: dst cache overflow) and crash of a firewall under Linux 2.6.17 and the route patch from Julian Anastasov. With rtstat I see that the route cache size increases regularly without never decreasing. I have this parameters: fw:/proc/sys/net/ipv4/route# grep . * error_burst:1250 error_cost:250 gc_elasticity:15 gc_interval:60 gc_min_interval:0

Hi, I want to enable some target-specific functionality only if current build is 2nd LTO stage (i.e. optimizer called from plugin). What is best and recommended way to do it? --- With best regards, Konstantin

Hi, Working on private backend, based on llvm-3.7 Inside lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineCompares.cpp there is attempt to optimize fabs: if (F->getIntrinsicID() == Intrinsic::fabs || ... switch (I.getPredicate()) { ... case FCmpInst::FCMP_OGT: return new FCmpInst(FCmpInst::FCMP_ONE, CI->getArgOperand(0), RHSC); But CI->getArgOperand(0)

Hello. I''m trying to use vlan in domU, but have something strange: I created bridge on eth0. This interface was configured as trunk with vlan 300, 301. I use this bridge in my domU, and I can see tagged packets when run tcpdump in domU. Also I created interface on domU to work with vlan 300. On this interface I see untagged packets in vlan300. And everything looks fine. But when

Hi, Thanks for pointing direction. As far, as I understand by reversing, logic, that I want to overwrite is digged into: lib/MC/MCSectionELF.cpp MCSectionELF::PrintSwitchToSection if (ShouldOmitSectionDirective(SectionName, MAI)) { OS << '\t' << getSectionName() << '\n'; return; } // otherwise print ".section" directive and then section

Hi, I am debugging private backend and faced interesting problem: sometimes spill hoisting creates double stores. (some output from -debug-only=regalloc). First hoisting: Checking redundant spills for 0 at 16r in %vreg19 [16r,144B:0)[144B,240B:1)[240B,280r:2)[296r,416B:3)[416B,456r:4)[472r,592B:5) 0 at 16r 1 at 144B-phi 2 at 240B-phi 3 at 296r 4 at 416B-phi 5 at 472r Merged to stack int: SS#0

I have a strange problem with VLANs with Xen 3.0.4. I signalled it on Xen-users list, but found no definitive solution to it. I configure VLANs so that they are available in dom0; domUs don''t know that they use VLANs. I use a stock "network-bridge" comming from Xen for setting up networking: #!/bin/bash dir=$(dirname "$0") "$dir/network-bridge"