similar to: inherit views

has anyone has any idea how to implement audit trail table for all update / deletion done on records? I''m thinking to have corresponding audit trail table to each table, so everthing before an update or deletion is done, a new record will be insert into the corresponding audit trail table. Is there a way to overwrite the save, destroy, method at the application level? so that I do not

Dear developers, I discovered that directories created by scp when recursive copying into a sgid directory do not inherit the sgid bit. I believe this is a bug. A patch to fix this is attached. Regards, Petr Skovron -------------- next part -------------- --- scp.c.orig 2005-10-11 16:50:17.000000000 +0200 +++ scp.c 2005-10-11 16:57:25.000000000 +0200 @@ -876,8 +876,12 @@

Is class table inheritance possible with MySQL and Rails? I saw John Wilger''s cool yet complicated Postgres implementation. I have looked for a solution, but I can not find one. Are there any plans for class table inheritance for Rails in the future? --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

This has been driving me crazy for a few days now. I am using sqlite3 however I have also found this to be the case with 2.8.15: I have data types text or integer on every column of every table in the database. Now i know sqlite doesnt care much about data types, but I believe rails does (correct me if im wrong). On pages that query a table, everything is perfect. BUT when I use a view

Here is my scenario: I have two directories that have their access controlled by secondary groups of the users. \\server\coolguys is available to the group 'admins' while the directory \\server\averagejoes is accessible to the group 'lusers'. I have a user, we'll call him joe, that is primarily in the admins group, but is also in lusers. If joe is to copy a directory or a

Hi all, I have a share set up as follows: [images] path = /images read only = No create mask = 0660 directory mask = 2770 hide special files = yes hide files = /lost+found/ acl group control = yes inherit acls = yes map acl inherit = yes inherit permissions = yes map archive = no security mask = 0111 When users create files or directories under this share, the ACL's

Now that we're supporting things like Ada and the GSP, there's situations where we really need to actually know the display state that we're starting with when loading the driver in order to prevent breaking GSP expectations. The first step in doing this is making it so that we can read the current state of IORs from nvkm in DRM, so that we can fill in said into into the atomic state.

Let''s say I have a "main" controller/view and a "sub" controller/view. If I have defined a partial in "main" for the site header (_site_header.rhtml) can I share it with "sub" or does "sub" have to duplicate it, use a symbolic link to the file, or convert the cool partial into an ugly helper? It would be nice to have a shared placed

So all Sellers are Users, Users can be Sellers in this marketplace model. Should Seller be on top and inherit to User or the other way round? I found it weird when doing a Session login, I've to call *Seller.has_sold?* even though all they are all Users to begin with, but I can't call *User.has_sold?* since the method is not in User.rb. -- You received this message because you are

We are running a fileserver (Samba version 3.0.10-1.4E.9) on CentOS 4.4. No AD, clients are Windows XP and OS X. Linux acl's are used for access to directories and files. Each top-level folder belongs to a primary group with mode 2770. The acl's restrict access to lower level directories. We need to pass the acl's down the directory tree or else users may have unexpected access to

I noticed that vfs_acl_xattr doesn't work unless all the inherit and map inherit acl parameters are set to yes. Which is fine but if I turn off inherit owner it completely breaks inheritance and security.NTACL never gets set for the file/directory that's created by the user. I want the uid of the user who's connected to be written and not the owner of the parent directory. Is there

Hi, While testing the upgrade from 2.0.6 to 2.0.7 I found some kind of misbehaviour of inherit permissions. It was already known that the SGID bit on directories is only useable with "inherit permissions = yes". Most of my shares depend heavily on this (unix) feature. Today I found out I cannot change a file attribute to read-only from NT while "inherit permissions" is set

Hello, I have set up that uses single table inheritance. I have a number of model subclasses following the example in AWDWR that uses Manager < Employee < Person. First question. Do I need to create controller classes for each? I don''t think I do because a single controller should be able to shunt the data between the models and the views. Second question. Say I have a view

Dear samba users, inherit permissions & g+s works great as a single share for different groups of users. However I've found a limitation/bug/shortcoming..... I can't write as a specific group into a sub-sub-directory of a share. I'll step through my working share.... I've got a share with inherit permissions = yes and g+s on directories. I've then got a folder called

Somewhere between Samba 4.2.10 and 4.6.2 (came with CentOS 7 updates) the setgid bit is not inherited anymore when making directories via my Samba service. Everything else is still fine. With ssh direct on the file system or sftp, i get all permissions and acls inherited nicely. Also with Samba all acls are still just fine, except that setgid bit is not inherited (s on the group executable

Morning all. I am reading trough https://www.samba.org/samba/docs/current/man-html/smb.conf.5.html As I was curious what exactly 'map acl inherit' does. "This boolean parameter is only relevant for systems that do not support standardized NFS4 ACLs but only a POSIX draft implementation of ACLs. Linux is the only common UNIX system which does still not offer standardized NFS4 ACLs

Hi all, We have a Linux host sharing a folder out via Samba. The Linux host has underlying ACLs set on the files using setfacl to grant local Linux groups permissions on the files and folders. The users of Samba are then placed into groups which in turn grant them these permissions via Samba when accessing the files and folders from a Windows RDP Server applying the correct permissions. This is

To my knowledge the 'inherit acls' option should make new files inherit the default acls from the containing folder... Please correct me if I'm wrong! But when I turn this setting on, it just don't seem to work... In other words, newly created files do not get the default acls from the containing folder... Please advice anyone... (running Samba 3.0.21b-1 on Debian Sarge)

I'm having a problem with inherit owner... it doesn't seem to work at all. This directory is shared drwxrwsr-t 3 projectadmin Project Authors 4096 Sep 8 15:59 testing Using this global definitiion # Global parameters [global] workgroup = TEST realm = MYDOMAIN.LOCAL preferred master = no server string = Masterprojects File Server security = ADS encrypt passwords = yes log level = 2 log

Hi, I'm having difficultly getting Inherit Owner to work. I'm running the following: Solaris 10 (patch 6, I think) Samba 3.2.1 Joined to AD Domain I've been compiling Samba with: ./configure --prefix=/usr/local/samba --exec-prefix=/usr/local/samba --enable-nss-wrapper --enable-cups --with-ads --with-pam --with-acl-support --with-krb5=/usr/local --with-ldap