similar to: [HTB] Individual band for each IP in an IP range

Hi, I''m trying to use prio qdisc with htb, however not the "usual" way (like for example FairNAT). Here is my idea: Root has HTB shaping traffic to link speed -> then goes PRIO queues -> each prio queue has HTB with sublasses for each user, should look like this: 1: htb qdisc | 1:1 htb class

Hello, i have a htb setup where the root and (nearly) all child classes has a ceil rate with max up from my adsl line. But the root class don''t reach the ceil value but some childs are get a huge backlog. My setup: (tc -d class show dev ppp0) [cleaned a bit] ******************************************************** class htb 1:1 root rate 576000bit ceil 576000bit burst 30Kb/8 cburst

My hardware is a Linksys AP with MIPS 300MHz and Linux kernel 2.4.20. The traffics are from two LAN switch ports to WAN port. And the traffics are generate at a rate of 80Mbit. So the total traffic to WAN port is 160Mbit. The shaping works well that the traffic to WAN port is about 50/30Mbit according to configuration. But the priority seems strange when the root rate is 50Mbit. When the root

I have a lot question about tc-command because now i''m doing research to compare performance between HTB and HFSC so i''m doubt a lot thing and your reply are so very helpful me ... my question is 1. I''m use opensource (Mastershaper) for help to config traffic control but when i''m try to config HTB, I''m doubt about in each chain must identify

I have a lot question about tc-command because now i''m doing research to compare performance between HTB and HFSC so i''m doubt a lot thing and your reply are so very helpful me ... my question is 1. I''m use opensource (Mastershaper) for help to config traffic control but when i''m try to config HTB, I''m doubt about in each chain must identify fallback

Hello. I am wondering if the default (auto-computed) burst and cburst parameters are appropriate values for my application. I have a 100 mbit interface which is connected to a 16 mbit uplink. I am sharing this bandwidth into a set of partitions (tc classes) defined as follows: root class [1:1] |

Hi! Here''s what I want: root class 0010 premium parent class 1000 premium child classes 1xyz best-effort parent class 2000 best-effort child classes 2xyz default class 3000 Here''s how I do it: eth1: DEFAULT=3000 eth1-0010.root: RATE=100Mbit LEAF=sfq eth1-0010:1000.premium CEIL=352Kbit RATE=352Kbit PRIO=2 LEAF=sfq eth1-0010:1000:1xyx.child1 CEIL=32Kbit RATE=8Kbit

Hi I am current trying to set up a guaranteed minimum rate for the leaf (1:1x). Also would I be correct in saying that the quantum is the dividing rule (so if I keep it the same "1532" and keep all the leafs in "1:1x" prio 3 they should all get the same amount of bandwidth shared across them equally?). For example below would the "rate" in the "1:1x" leaf

Hello... Im trying to setup HTB to allow me to shape traffic from two upstreams that meets on single lan0 interface. I prefer to use HTB qdisc within HTB root qdisc for cleaner rules design. Seems that it doesnt work at all. tc -s class show doesnt show any traffic on other classes attached to HTB qdisc. Linux 2.6.20.7 iproute-2.6.20-070313 Weird thing is that tc -s class show that 1: and 2:

Hi I''m actually using a wondershaper derived script. The problem I have is that when I ping (ping is in high priority queue) the ping time is not as low as I expected with p2p running: 760 packets transmitted, 760 received, 0% packet loss, time 759695ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 39.667/62.863/598.539/33.287 ms, pipe 2 With voip, it is much better with the qos but it is still a little

Dear Friends, I am using HTB version 0.85 in CENTOS 4.4 and I configurated to limit bandwidth port 80 (hhtp) and 25 (smtp), but HTB don't work. Below , show files. [root at srv001 htb]# ls -la total 36 drwxrwxrwx 2 root root 4096 Set 11 21:46 . drwxr-xr-x 11 root root 4096 Set 11 00:11 .. -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 19 Fev 12 2002 eth0 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 89 Set 11 01:01

Thanks for quick reply Andreas! > Every class is allowed to use bandwidth as long as it does not have to > borrow (the specified rate is guaranteed). Prio in HTB only affects > borrowing bandwidth from other classes... In the example below, the class > 1:5 should be allowed to borrow bandwidth before 1:14 does. Thats exactly what I want from HTB to do..to prio the borrowed bandwidth.

Dear All, I’m working with Fedora Core 3, kernel 2.9.1, MPLS-for-Linux-4.193, and having some problems when create a HTB queue. ALL packets goes to the default queue, they don’t care about any mark or ip field I use to enqueue them. : -/ That’s the deal, all packets that incoming the interface eth2 are classified and have theirs TOS field changed following some qos policy at the PREROUTING

I have a lot question about tc-command because now i''m doing research to compare performance between HTB and  HFSC so i''m doubt a lot thing and your reply are so very helpful to me ... My question is In HTB tc command question 1. I''m use opensource (Mastershaper) for help to config traffic control but when i''m try to config HTB, I''m doubt about

Hi, got a 25/25Mbit connection which is quite stuffed. So I applied htb rules. Uplink: class htb 1:1 root rate 24500Kbit ceil 24500Kbit burst 4661b/8 mpu 0b overhead 0b cburst 4661b/8 mpu 0b overhead 0b level 7 Sent 430600689269 bytes 730147320 pkt (dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 0) rate 23057Kbit 5520pps backlog 0b 0p requeues 0 lended: 199673949 borrowed: 0 giants: 0 tokens: -964

Hi all, I''m trying to setup htb on a box with the following class configuration: class htb 1:2 root rate 4Mbit ceil 4Mbit burst 2099b/8 mpu 0b overhead 0b cburst 2099b/8 mpu 0b overhead 0b level 7 Sent 0 bytes 0 pkts (dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 0) lended: 0 borrowed: 0 giants: 0 tokens: 4300 ctokens: 4300 class htb 1:4 parent 1:2 leaf 4: prio 7 quantum 1000 rate 1Kbit ceil

Hello. I''m running linux box with Slackware 9.1 and compiled kernel 2.4.31 with "yes" to VLANs and "yes" to all QoS. On this box i have more ethernet interfaces: eth0 eth1 eth2 and so as more vlan interfaces: eth0.100 eth1.3 eth1.4 This is entrace(uplink) router to our whole network and my goal is to shape users on this machine. I want for this purpose use HTB so

Hello Everybody, I am successful in throttling down the Bandwidth to 8kbit using HTB. Below that I get report to change r2q. I want to bring down the Leaf class Bandwidth to 3kbit. My script is as below: Tc Script to throttle down the Bandwidth to 8kbit based on MAC address and IP address tc qdisc del dev eth0 root tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1:0 htb default 30 r2q 1 tc class add

I cannot get HTB to function properly. Most classes transmit more than their ceiling, more than any reasonable burst would allow. I have reviewed my script several times but I can''t find anything out of place. The setup is as standard as it gets: one HTB root qdisc, a small tree of HTB classes, one SFQ qdisc for each leaf HTB class. To illustrate the problem, here is non-leaf HTB

Hello Stef, I am working on a Bandwidth management project as part of my college curriculum.I am running TCNG 10-b but I am not able to classify packets based on MAC address using tcng, so I am running tc commands in /tcng/bin and they are working. But is there a way out to classify packets based on MAC address using TCNG. And, I am successful in throttling down the Bandwidth to 8kbit