similar to: pfifo_fast priomap

Hi all, Here is something that i still haven''t understood. When installing PRIO, it creates 3 "classes" with priority level according to the TOS. That command line : # tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: prio give that result : # tc qd sh qdisc prio 1: dev eth0 bands 3 priomap 1 2 2 2 1 2 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 How should i read that priomap, what does it mean and how to

IMHO, the priomap explanation in the 9.2.1.1. of the LARTC HOWTO is not clear enough. I only understood it''s real behavior until I read this document from Russell Stuart: http://ace-host.stuart.id.au/russell/files/tc/doc/tc/priority.txt So, based in this information, I''ve prepared an alternative priomap explanation for this section of the HOWTO, if you like it as it is I could

Today I''ve noticed a bit strange (?) behaviour when prio qdisc is used. Example (having no filters/qdisc/etc. at the start) : Add simple 9 bands qdisc, set each mapping to lowest priority band: tc qdisc add dev $eth root handle 1: prio bands 9 priomap 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 If I do just that, all is fine - whole traffic ends in 9th band, what can easily be verified by tc -s

Hi routing-experts ! If I want to prioritize up ssh and telnet traffic with Linux 2.4 netfilter and iproute2. I''ve set outbound tcp 22, 23 and 21 TOSbits to minimize delay, but this doesn''t seem to be enough to prioritize ssh over for example http-traffic. I''m using modem to connect to Internet and got an entire LAN behind the Linux router/firewall. Well, I think most

Hi, I have following queries: - 1.How to see data exchanged at all the bands of pfifo_fast(command)? "tc -s qdisc ls dev eth0" only shows following output qdisc pfifo_fast 0: bands 3 priomap 1 2 2 2 1 2 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Sent 71132584 bytes 312294 pkts (dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 0) Its only showing data exchanged in band 0. 2.I am using following command to drop

Hep Trying to get pfifo to work. Setup : |------|<--->eth1 (192.168.10.0/24) eth0---| GW |<--->eth2 (192.168.11.0/24) |------|<--->eth3 (192.168.12.0/24) read all documentation : http://lartc.org/howto/lartc.cookbook.interactive-prio.html here is my TOS mangling rulse in iptables : $IPTABLES -A PREROUTING -i eth1 -t mangle -s 192.168.10.0/24 -p tcp --dport

Hi, I have a cable modem with a bandwidth capped upload rate. I''d like to prioritize packets going outbound according to the TOS header of the IP field. I''ve read through the LARTC Howto several times, and I think I have a good feel for the information it it. It also seems that what I''m trying to do is pretty straight-forward and common. Unfortunately, the HOWTO

Dear list, before writeing this mail I really searched in the mailing list and deeply red the HOWTO, but I didn''t find a clear and univoque answer to my doubt. What is the meaning of the priomap? And what kind of TOS concerns? My first opinin was the one-to-one correspondence of the priomap and the 16 values of the four TOS bits. I mean priomap 1 2 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 implies

Hello list, We are facing a bug with Windows DNS MMC on a Windows 2008R2 DC. We have reproduced the bug on samba 4.2.3, 4.5.6 and 4.6.7 on redhat 6.3 If we try to add a record or a Zone on the Windows DNS MMC connected to the 2008R2 DC we have an error "Refused" it seems related to the bug that were reporting on the 22 january 2016

I have been using the "username map" parameter for some time on various versions of Samba 2, and it has worked nicely. Last week I upgraded to Samba 3 and integrated with Active Directory. Since I am using Solaris 8, and "nsswitch.conf" doesn't support winbindd, I am using the "add user script" parameter to add users. What is happening is that users in

Hello, I am having a problem after performing a classicupgrade with rc6. This did not happen with previous RCs. When adding any of the AD MMC snap-ins from a member computer, MMC crashes with the error below. I have the provision scripted and am using the same ldif, smb.conf and /var/lib/samba, so I'm fairly certain the only difference is rc6. I am testing with a Win 7 VM image that was

I''ve been reading the RoR tutorials and wiki help stuff, but I''m stuck. :( I''ve got RoR installed properly and get the "Welcome aboard! You''re riding the rails." I have an "article" controller, "article" model, and both an "article" and "articles" views (one is a remnant, I think, and no longer needed) (the

On Thu, 25 Apr 2024 11:44:42 +0000 Philippe Maladjian via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hello everyone, > > I'm preparing a migration from a NT4-mode domain controller 3.5 to > version 4.19. The migration process is going well, but from the share > management MMC, no matter the share defined in the smb.conf, when I > try to access the authorization tab, I

On Thu, 25 Apr 2024 12:42:16 +0000 Philippe Maladjian <pmaladjian at hilaire.fr> wrote: > On Thu, 25 Apr 2024 11:44:42 +0000 > Philippe Maladjian via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > Hello everyone, > > > > I'm preparing a migration from a NT4-mode domain controller 3.5 to > > version 4.19. The migration process is going well, but

Hi folks, Im trying to get a multi-card reader on centos (SD, MMC, and so, 4 card slots) and i have read (http://www.cs.sfu.ca/~ggbaker/personal/cf-linux) that CONFIG_SCSI_MULTI_LUN should be enabled on kernel (=Y) but current 34.0.2 doesn't have it enabled by default, is there any particular reason to not be enabled? By the other hand i've also tweak the /etc/grub.conf file to boot the

On Thu, 25 Apr 2024 11:44:42 +0000 Philippe Maladjian via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hello everyone, > > I'm preparing a migration from a NT4-mode domain controller 3.5 to > version 4.19. The migration process is going well, but from the share > management MMC, no matter the share defined in the smb.conf, when I > try to access the authorization tab, I

Am going thru the learning curve on using samba as a primary controller. Samba is up and running just fine. However, I'm a bit confused on the ntlogin.pol thing. I'm gathering, if all the workstations are winxp, I need to do this?? "Go to the Windows 200x/XP menu Start->Programs->Administrative Tools and select the MMC snap-in called Active Directory Users and Computers

So only for old NT4 style PDC - BDC environment one needs poledit. While AD's (with virtual pdc role servers) can use the MMC.? We got a pure Samba AD environment and thus it should work. Be it that we might not have all mmc templates (not yet checked that). Thanks Viktor. -----Original message----- From: Viktor Trojanovic?<viktor at troja.ch> Sent: Wednesday 21st October 2020

Hello everyone, This set will switch the users of pm_runtime_put_autosuspend() to __pm_runtime_put_autosuspend() while the former will soon be re-purposed to include a call to pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(). The two are almost always used together, apart from bugs which are likely common. Going forward, most new users should be using pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(). Once this conversion is done and

================================================================= "Why don't we save time and you just tell me what I want?" Mr. Big to Carie, Sex and the City ================================================================= Release Announcements ===================== This is the latest stable release of Samba 3.5. Major enhancements in Samba 3.5.2 include: o Fix