similar to: cancelling before_destroy

Hi I''m struggling to find a neat way to spec this. The Sequel ORM doesn''t support automatically destroying dependent models. It''s easy enough to do in a callback though: class Changeset < Sequel::Model has_many :migrations, :class => DataModel::Migration before_destroy do migrations.each { |m| m.destroy } end # ... end

How to write the method before_destroy? Here is my code: def before_destroy errors.add(:isdefault,"Can''t destroy default record") if self.isdefault return false end or I should write it like below? def before_destroy raise(Can''t destroy default record") if self.isdefault end and how to write the test for it -- Posted via

Hello, I''m trying to intercept delete call in my model but before_destroy callback is never called... Somebody knows why ? Thanks The controller : def delete Image.delete(params[:id]) redirect_to :action => "list" end The model : class Image < ActiveRecord::Base set_table_name "publish_images" belongs_to :article before_destroy :on_destroy

I have a problem with before_destroy deleting by dependent records, even through I return flase. ... has_many :users, :class_name => ''Editor'', :as => :editable, :dependent => :destroy ... def before_destroy unless self.has_access?(99) errors.add_to_base "Destroy permissions error!" return false end end When I remove the dependent

(Semi-newbie.) I want to ensure a user''s able to destroy only his own objects. I''ve set session info at login: session[:user_id] = user.id Now I try this in the model of my deletable objects: before_destroy :destroy_your_own def destroy_your_own raise "Can''t delete that!" unless session[:user_id] == self.user.id end which snags EVERY attempted

We have a test that has been working find until we upgraded to rails 2.3.5. I''m not too familiar with mocks/stubs so maybe there is an easy solution. Here is a simple example of our scenario. Class Person < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :aliases, :dependent => :nullify before_destroy :mark_aliases_as_deleted def mark_aliases_as_deleted self.aliases.each do

Hey, probably an easy question but, I''m trying to get a method to run "before_destory" for a model, and I want the method to throw an error, and not delete the object from the database, if a certain condition is held Obviously, I can just raise an error and rescue it... but for some reason I can''t get <% error_messages_for ''model" %> to catch

There were little changes when I activate "echo cancel" without AGC. And activating "echo cancel" with AGC results poor voice quality. The relationship between input frame and echo frame is written to "very important" in SpeeX 1.1.11.1 manual. And I use "previous decoded data" for echo frame. <<<<---- no problem??? I show you again my code

Hi. I've implemented "echo cancel" to voip project. But it doesn't work well . (I cannot feel the enhancement with activated AGC) My encode settings : 1. frame size : 320 bytes. 2. sampling rate : 16000 Hz (WB) 3. mono echo state initialized like this : echo_state = speex_echo_state_init(framesize, framesize*16); and befor encode : speex_echo_cancel(echo_state,

Hi All, I have managed to integrate SAMBA and CUPS on my hardware running on linux basically used as a print-server. I give print-commands from Windows PC and the printer is connected to the hardware. I am able to get the print-jobs done. Also, I am able to cancel all the jobs at a time by selecting "Cancel All" from the menu The problem is that I am unable to control the individual

Hello, I'm wondering how to make it possible for the user to cancel the last entered digit, if he made a mistake. For example, a user calls and starts entering 1...2...4, then he should be able to press, lets say *, to cancel 4 and enter i.e. 3. Thanks Jake -- ------- Domeny w ULTRA NISKICH cenach: ------- .pl - 29 zl, .com.pl - 22,50 zl, reg - 7,50 zl

Hello- With a database filled with several customers'' datasets, I thought it would be a nice feature of my app''s backend interface to be able to extract (and optionally delete) the data from a single customer. It would then also be nice to rebuild that data from the stored info. What''s a good way to do this efficiently? If all the ":dependent => true"

Hello, I am exploring the "Testing" part of Rails, but It seems some things work differently than I thought it would. Consider the following model: class Client < ActiveRecord::Base has_one :project def after_create Project.new(:name => self.name, :is_client => true, :client_id => self.id).save end def after_update

I have a tree of models that represent a book. Looks like this: book sections documents paragraphs index entries glossary entries footnotes index entries glossary entries These are all models with has_many from parent and the child has belongs_to. They also all have dependent => :destroy

This is an ugly hack to fix the betternestedset plugin as currently a bug does not allow pools to be deleted. The single line commented out in this patch deletes the pool itself instead of only its children for whatever reason. This wouldn't be a problem were it not for the recent change to active record which enforces optimistic locking upon destroy operations. Since the database record is

Hi, I wanted to play around with the echo canceller so I tried the testecho program. As speaker sound I fed it with a 440 Hz sine wave, and as mic with a 550 Hz + 440 Hz sine waves sound (but the 440 Hz component half the amplitude). I kind of expected to get a somewhat clean 550 Hz sine out, but it doesn't seem to work that way. Are there better samples I can use with testecho to see

Hey... I have these business_accounts that have a bunch of members through a business_account_membership model. A membership can be a privileged, "managing" one, and a business account should always have one such privileged member, so I have a before_destroy filter on the business_account_membership model to prevent the deletion of the last managing member of a business account.

What''s the best way to validate_on_destroy. Rails only seems to include validate_on_create and validate_on_update methods. I don''t want to resort to doing: before_destroy do |j| raise "There is an error" if j.etc end Is there a way of finding out what action (create/update/destroy) is being performed if I use the ''validate'' method? -- Posted via

Hi all, i''m learning rspec and i must admit i really love it. But at the time i started learning it, i already developed my models classes and their callbacks. Now i''m trying to get a 100% coverage of my code but i cannot reach it because i do not understand how to spec my callbacks. Look at this for example: ----------------- User Model class User < ActiveRecord::Base

Hi all I''ve approached Rails since a couple of months to develop a quick application for my company. Fantastic framework. As every noob, I do have some gaps to cover. The one which is giving me a little frustration, generated by my lack of knowledge is as follows. I need to make sure the region object is not deleted if there are countries associated with it. I solved this by putting a