Displaying 20 results from an estimated 3000 matches similar to: "HTB question, tokens."
2006 Feb 24
4
why isn''t 1:1 getting the traffic? [filter question]
With the below script, whenever I ping 10.0.16.10 (which matches the
only filter I have), traffic still get''s sent to the default 1:2 class
instead of 1:1 and I don''t know why... Any hints?
(kernel 2.6.12, iproute2-2.6.15)
tc qdisc del dev eth0 root > /dev/null 2>&1
tc qdisc add dev eth0 handle 1: root htb default 2
tc class add dev eth0 classid 1:1 parent 1: htb rate
2007 Oct 25
7
TC (HTB) doesn''t work well when network is congested?
Hi,
I have a server and ten clients in a Gigabit network. The server has
125mbps network bandwidth.
I want that the server has 40Mbps bandwidth reserved for client 1 (IP
192.168.5.141), and the
rest bandwidth is for all other clients.
My script looks like this (I use IFB for incoming traffic):
#!/bin/bash
export TC="/sbin/tc"
$TC qdisc add dev ifb0 root handle 1: htb default 30
2006 Sep 08
8
htb traffic shaping problem
Hello.
I have a linux server connected to a gigabit lan, and though that lan to a
768kbps/768kbps DSL modem.
I''m trying to shape my webserver running on port 80/443 down to 512kbps,
while leaving all other ports alone. The current configuration script that
I''m using is as follows:
tc qdisc del dev eth0 root
tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb default 99
tc class add dev
2006 Apr 09
2
tc counters "problem"
Hi, I''m using tc and HTB to shape my outgoing ADSL traffic. I was trying to
make some graphs on the classes by meassuring the "sent bytes" of each class
using rrdtool to store the data (as kbps after conversion). I expected that
meassuring the root class I would get values similar that the ones I get
measuring the interface counters but they differ by a large amount.
Is
2006 Sep 09
2
Re: htb traffic shaping problem (Charlie Meyer)
Eric,
I''ve attached the output from the command you requested below.
I''m using kernel 2.6.17.12 and tc version ss060323. I''m have a nforce4
onboard giggabit controller using the forcedeth driver, if that makes a
difference.
Charlie,
I''ll take a look at the Apache model for throttling, thanks. I was going
for tc because was going to try to add additional
2006 Mar 08
1
negative token/ctokens
In this simple htb setup:
# tc -s -d class ls dev eth0
class htb 1:1 root rate 300000bit ceil 300000bit burst 1749b/8 mpu 0b overhead
0b cburst 1749b/8 mpu 0b overhead 0b level 7
Sent 13171835 bytes 13169 pkt (dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 0)
rate 45848bit 10pps backlog 0b 0p requeues 0
lended: 5272 borrowed: 0 giants: 0
tokens: -84429 ctokens: -84429
class htb 1:2 parent 1:1 prio 0
2005 Sep 26
1
Hmmm... Weird results with HTB in kernel 2.6.11
Hi all,
I have been getting some strange results with HTB in kernel 2.6.11, and
was wondering if anybody could give me some advice. Also, if someone
could direct me to the changelog for the recent versions so I can see if
it is worth upgrading?
Anyway, the problem can best be summed up by looking at the output of
''tc -s -d class show dev eth0''. Some of the relevant results
2006 Apr 10
1
Where is the documentation for IFB ?
Hi all,
Can you tell me where is the documentation for the new IFB (implemented
in kernels > 2.6.16).
Thanks in advance!
Nikolay
2007 Aug 29
11
tc not matching
Dear all,
I''m having real problems getting tc to do anything useful at all. I''m
also under pressure to get this fixed before the students start arriving
later this month (I work in a university).
In short, I want each IP address to be hard limited to 128kbit down,
64kbit up, never to be allowed more bandwidth than this. It is also
important that the latency remains
2006 Apr 15
13
htb overrate with 2.6.16
Hi
Here is something that worked with with 2.6.10-1.771_FC2smp and stopped
working when I upgraded to 2.6.16-1.2069_FC4smp.
These are fedora kernels and the network controller is an Intel Gbit
(e1000) running a 100 Mbps Full Duplex.
Don''t know how or if this matters but the 2.6.10 kernel has
CONFIG_X86_HZ=1000 and the 2.6.16 has CONFIG_HZ=250
The idea is to just shape to , say 2Mbit, a
2006 May 19
25
iptables CLASSIFY and MARK not working?
I have to match my packets based on MAC address, which I cannot do in
the POSTROUTING chain, so I do it in PREROUTING using MARK. Then, I
match on the MARK in the POSTROUTING chain to do a CLASSIFY. But this
does not seem to work:
wireless-r1 bwlimit # iptables -L -v -n -t mangle
Chain PREROUTING (policy ACCEPT 3353K packets, 941M bytes)
pkts bytes target prot opt in out source
2005 Nov 14
6
Transfer speed exceeding the ceil
What''s going on here? I''m spewing UDP traffic at this thing, and it is
exceeding the ceil. Anyone know how to fix this?
class htb 1:613 parent 1:5 leaf 613: prio 6 quantum 2560 rate 20480bit
ceil 103360bit burst 15Kb/8 mpu 0b overhead 0b cburst 1728b/8 mpu 0b
overhead 0b level 0
Sent 16591370 bytes 4159 pkt (dropped 39449, overlimits 0 requeues 0)
rate 412384bit 6pps backlog 0b
2005 Sep 28
4
Re:Does HTB consider PRIO or not? 2
Thanks for quick reply Andreas!
> Every class is allowed to use bandwidth as long as it does not have to
> borrow (the specified rate is guaranteed). Prio in HTB only affects
> borrowing bandwidth from other classes... In the example below, the class
> 1:5 should be allowed to borrow bandwidth before 1:14 does.
Thats exactly what I want from HTB to do..to prio the borrowed bandwidth.
2006 Apr 26
1
HTB - Rate errors
Hi,
I''m trying to get HTB working correctly on Centos4 (RHEL-based) with
kernel 2.6.9-34.EL. I have two gigabit network interfaces bridged
together and I have created the following:
tc qdisc add dev eth2 root handle 1: htb default 1 r2q 8000
tc class add dev eth2 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 100Mbit burst 24k
cburst 24k
(I have been trying different parameters).
The network is
2004 Oct 21
2
how to read the stats
Hi
I have setup iproute2 and need a bit of help reading the stats from it
===== output
qdisc htb 1: r2q 10 default 20 direct_packets_stat 0 ver 3.17
Sent 547326809 bytes 1342627 pkts (dropped 9303, overlimits 2817572
requeues 0)
backlog 46p
qdisc sfq 10: limit 128p quantum 1514b flows 128/1024 perturb 10sec
Sent 41874343 bytes 730889 pkts (dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 0)
qdisc sfq
2007 Dec 15
1
hfsc and bps
Hi!
Do you know somthing about hfsc and bps?
There''s no output for speed only for packets. Doesn''t hfsc support such
a field?
tc -s class show dev eth0
class hfsc 1: root
Sent 0 bytes 0 pkt (dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 0)
rate 0bit 0pps backlog 0b 0p requeues 0
period 0 level 2
class hfsc 1:11 parent 1:1 sc m1 0bit d 18.0ms m2 1000Kbit ul m1 0bit d
0us m2
2013 Dec 03
5
Multiple ISP + traffic shapping = poor download speed
Hello,
Thanks for the great Shorewall which has replaced my hard to maintain home-made scripts.
First, what works.
Our local network is 10.48.X.X with multiple vlan, each on a dedicated interface. We use Shorewall 4.4.11 from Debian Squeeze.
We have a 2 ISP:
- isp1 : an optical fiber provider with 10 Mbps.
- isp2 : a DSL provider with 15Mbits/1Mbits.
We use isp2 as the default outgoing
2005 Dec 05
1
Connmark question
I am trying to get IPP2P working on my router. Thus far I can see
connections being marked (see below), but they don''t seem to get saved
or something. When looking at /proc/net/ip_conntrack, nothing has
anything other than 0 for mark. The iptables commands for this are:
iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -j CONNMARK --restore-mark
iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -m mark ! --mark 0 -j
2007 Aug 19
0
HTB qdisc within HTB root qdisc
Hello...
Im trying to setup HTB to allow me to shape traffic from two upstreams
that meets on single lan0 interface. I prefer to use HTB qdisc
within HTB root qdisc for cleaner rules design.
Seems that it doesnt work at all. tc -s class show doesnt
show any traffic on other classes attached to HTB qdisc.
Linux 2.6.20.7
iproute-2.6.20-070313
Weird thing is that tc -s class show that 1: and 2:
2005 Nov 15
1
UDP transfer speed exceeding the ceil by about 4x
A bit more detail.
I have the following htb classes set up...
class htb 1:356 parent 1:4 leaf 356: prio 4 quantum 1600 rate 12800bit
ceil 51680bit burst 15Kb/8 mpu 0b overhead 0b cburst 1663b/8 mpu 0b
overhead 0b level 0
class htb 1:357 parent 1:4 leaf 357: prio 4 quantum 1600 rate 12800bit
ceil 51680bit burst 15Kb/8 mpu 0b overhead 0b cburst 1663b/8 mpu 0b
overhead 0b level 0
class htb 1:2 root