similar to: multiple routing tables for internal router programs

Hi, I have searched the archives on the topic, and it seems that the list gurus favor load balancing to be done in the kernel as opposed to other means. I have been using a home-grown approach, which splits traffic based on `-m statistic --mode random --probability X`, then CONNMARKs the individual connections and the kernel happily routes them. I understand that for > 2 links it will become

Hi, I have a testing multihome setup, with the default gateway being one of the links and using policy routing to honor requests for a specific link. Everything works as expected when I request a specific IP to bind to. But if I request a specific interface things fall apart in ways that I can not explain: default gw (WORKS) ---------- rabbit@Thesaurus:~$ ping -c 1 yahoo.com PING yahoo.com

Hi, catch_all.cpp: 1 int main() 2 { 3 try { 4 throw 34; 5 } 6 catch (...) {} 7 } llvm-gcc -O3 -S -emit-llvm catch_all.cpp -o catch_all.ll: 1 ; ModuleID = 'catch_all.cpp' 2 target datalayout =

I am developing load balancing router, But I have a question about fail over. The follow diagram is my test environment and scripts. ------------------------------------------------------------------- Environment Setting PC1(192.168.10.2) | (LAN) | PC2-eth2(192.168.10.1) +

Hello everyone, I was wondering what is the status regarding exceptions for the windows-msvc target? The corresponding part of the documentation (llvm/decs/ExceptionHandling.rst) hasn't been updated since 2015, was there any progress since? This is most likely known, but there's significant divergence between the behavior of MSVC cl.exe and clang-cl.exe: Consider: void crash() {

Hi, I''ve been implementing a load balancing solution using CONNMARK, based on solution described by Luciano Ruete at [1]. Gracias por el post y por apuntar en la dirección correcta Luciano! Once implemented, I''ve found that due to some reason packets aren''t properly marked (or improperly remarked) and sent out using the wrong interface. My topo setup is:

Hello using Asterisk 1.8.32.3. What is the best way of knowing a call is being transfered (attended and unattended) ? And also knowing whereto (sip user) the call is being transfered and who is the transferer ? So I can log this information. Kind regards. J. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

This is more of a NF question but it is tightly related to LARTC as well. In the following example: -t mangle -A PREROUTING -i eth0 -j MARK 0x1 .... -t mangle -A INPUT -i eth0 -j MARK 0x2 Since MARK is a non-terminatring target, what would be the resulting mark on a packet comming from the outside and destined for a local process? Thanks P.S. I agree, the example looks stupid, but on the

Hello, world! Sorry to subscribe to the list only to immediately ask a question, but this one''s got me scratching my head and I can''t find the answer in the archives, the HOWTO, or on the web. Maybe I''m just asking the wrong question. Anyway, our Internet gateway is a Linux box. We''ve got two Internet feeds, a fast one from a crummy provider, and a

Hello, I am attempting to match on a single bit of the NF mark value, and after hours of reading and googling I can not get the syntax right. It got to be something very simple, yet I can''t find it. Any help will be greatly appreciated. Thanks! root@Arzamas:/etc/init.d# tc filter add dev wan_b protocol ip prio 2 parent 1:0 basic match meta\(nf_mark mask 0x80 eq 0x80\) flowid 1:0x80

(I know that what I''m wanting to do can be done, but for some reason I can not get it to work for the life of me. I think I have been staring at it too long and too closely.) I have two different internet connections from two cooperating ISPs. I also have a small 8 block of IPs that are globally routable that both ISPs will route to me via my world facing globally routable IPs that

Hi, I have a server and ten clients in a Gigabit network. The server has 125mbps network bandwidth. I want that the server has 40Mbps bandwidth reserved for client 1 (IP 192.168.5.141), and the rest bandwidth is for all other clients. My script looks like this (I use IFB for incoming traffic): #!/bin/bash export TC="/sbin/tc" $TC qdisc add dev ifb0 root handle 1: htb default 30

Hello list. I have been trying to figure this out on my own, but I guess I somewhat failed :) A linux router with external eth0 and internal eth1 acts as a gateway for a number of machines utilizing a partial T1 line (512kbps). Since the T1 is limited by hardware and by its nature to 64kbps per channel the most I can pump out of it is up+down < 512kbps. If a number of workstations amount to

Hello, Am writing to the list in the hope that someone out there might be able to help me make sure I have the right configuration here. I''m not all that au fait with routing using multiple interfaces. Some time ago I configured a web server to have two different IP addresses from two different network ranges on each of it''s two ethernet cards. I followed the excellent

Hi, I posted this question yesterday on the Openvpn mailing list, with no response, figured I will ask here too. I have been using openvpn for quite a while, no major problems encountered. Now I need to allow the server to access the lan of the client, and I can not figure out the routing. This is what I have after the tunnel is brought up: SERVER (A.A.A.A) Arx:~# ip addr ... 3: eth1:

Hello all, I got this problem while trying to shape traffic with iptables MARK and HTB. MARK: targinfosize 8 != 4 --set-mark gives "invalid argument" error message. Kernel version is 2.4.29 (some patches from patch o matic applied) Iptables version 1.3.4 Intel x86 architecture. I saw this problem discussed in a few places, but the discussions didn''t come to a conclusion

Hi, As a Linux package maintainer I tend to follow LLVM mostly towards the end of each release cycle; nevertheless, I sometimes need to keep track of multiple LLVM branches at the same time. It would be great if I could use Git's SVN to clone the repository once, and then have the full version history available locally in a compact format. As a bonus, this will reduce the load on the server

A handful of files in compiler-rt/builtins use the macro "__SOFT_FP__". All the uses are along the same lines. Here's a representative example from compiler-rt/lib/builtins/fixdfdi.c: #ifndef __SOFT_FP__ // Support for systems that have hardware floating-point; can set the invalid // flag as a side-effect of computation. ... #else // Support for systems that don't have

I have a doubt. If you use such a script monitoring the link status with ping and then reconfiguring, why do you need the DGD patch? You need to do some reconfiguration (change multipath to a single default route) anyway if you use the script, right? Also, the DGD patch uses src to lookup the routing table entry, but if you have a dynamic IP for the WAN interface (PPPoE, DHCP etc), this approach

Hi, I am working on linux 2.6.16.I tried to prioritize traffic using prio module but its not working well.It always maps to same class irrespective of ToS.Is it possible to fix it using filters?Anybody fixed this problem? -- Regards Archana Rajagopal _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc