similar to: elementary usage clamping

Hi All , My first message and I have a little problem with my FC6 box trying to block emule traffic using layer7 . Here my network : Internet --------- ADSL Router ------------------- FC6 Box -------------------- Emule Box external ADSL : Dynamic Internal ADSL : 192.168.254.1 external FC6 : 192.168.254.3 internal FC6 : 192.168.253.1 Emule Box : 192.168.253.3 I guess that everything

Hi all I am using a pass trhu router and I need to QoS some clients output by its IP address. The problem is that QoS is due after NATing. Is there some clever way of doing this besides MARKing every packet with some IP hashing in POSTROUTING NAT table? Regards Ethy

I have tried using iptraf for my NAT firewall to analyse the IP traffic. Basically I am faced with this difficulty of related the source IP to the outgoing interface to the internet, so I am wondering if anyone has a suggestion for a different ways to do it, or a suggestion for a better tool. Details :- Supposed : eth0 - LAN eth1 - WAN1 eth2 - WAN2 And then

Hi guys, i have a little doubt ; I have eth0 ethernet and eth1 wireless , and they are bridged in br0 Is there any difference in the behavior between do tc qdisc add dev br0 root sfq OR tc qdisc add dev eth0 root sfq && tc qdisc add dev eth1 root sfq -- []''s Salatiel "O maior prazer do inteligente é bancar o idiota diante de um idiota que banca o

Hi, I am very new to tc. I added a filter using the following command: tc filter add dev eth0 V parent 20:0 protocol ip prio 1 handle ::128 u32 match ip tos 0x44 0xfc flowid 20:1 To check if the filter rule was indeed added, I run tc filter show dev eth0 parent 20: This gave me the following output: filter protocol ip

Hi every body I have a linux server with Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 3.20GHz , and 2 Gigabit of RAM , kernel version 2.6.22.6 , and 2 Intel 82541PI Gigabit Ethernet controllers In simple situation i would like to limit bandwidth for 2 customers 1) ( to 34 Mb/s ) and 2) 68 Mb/s . My conf is as below ///////////////////////////////////////////////////// #IFACE FACONG THE CUSTOMERS /sbin/tc

Hello guys I have a subnet with 255 users, which need to share 1 single slow internet connection, so i would like to implement a kind of *fair queuing *on the UPLOAD between them, which means that they all share the connection equally.. The tools that i have available is: A linux box with IPROUTE2,HTB and TC.. I have looked at some examples, and my first idea was to make 255 entries in

Hi there! I''ve using HTB for a while and now I an faced with a ''problem''. How hierarchical is HTB? Let''s say I have this 3 layer HTB setup: root class 1: (rate=100, ceil=100) 1: children classes 1:10 (30,100) and 1:20 (70,100) 1:10 children classes 1:100 (10,100) and 1:101 (20,100) 1:20 children classes 1:200 (30,100) and 1:201 (70,100) I managed to have

What exactly happens if the sum of the children classes rate is bigger than the parent''s? What if the majority of these classes are using less than the minimum rate established (eg. 0kbps)? -- Marco Casaroli SapucaiNet Telecom +55 35 34712377 ext 5

Hi, I have a PC that acts as a VoIP gateway using an internet telephony provider to make phone calls.. Data between me and the provider will always be from one IP address on my internal network to the provider.. I have a 1Mbps/256Kbps ADSL line and the voice stream is highly compressed requireing only 30Kbps of bandwidth.. The problem is that when my Mozilla Mail client polls for mail or

Hi all, Since the mail list receives a lot of repeated subjects (for example: "i have two adsl lines..."), maybe these specific issues should be treated on the LARTC Guide, or maybe if we had an wiki? Is there a LARTC Wiki? If not, what do you think about creating one? Thanks -- Marco _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl

I am trying to create my own Token Bucket Filter. However, I have a problem with packet dropping. Scenario : I got two streams 20KB/s each. I got one bucket with rate 20KB/s I put both streams into this bucket. When buffer is full packets need to be dropped. The problem is that only every other packet needs to be dropped in this scenario. Streams are the same so queue looks like that : S1 |

Hi all !!! I have a firewall bridge (not router) with two nics that filter p2p with ipp2p. All works fine but now I need to add a third nic to route all p2p traffic through this nic. It is that possible with a bridge ? Later (with other server) connect to this nic I do loading balancing with two adsl lines to route all p2p traffic. Any hint ? Any howto ? Thanks in advance. roberto --

I'd take the opposite approach and tell them no new mail will be received until they are under quota. On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 4:52 PM SH Development <listaccount at starionline.com> wrote: > I don?t want to do this for all users?.but? > > I have a few users who insist that they use their mailboxes regularly and > don?t want it cancelled. Fine. But they won?t clean them out

In that scenario, what actually happens? Does mail get stored? Or rejected? Or delayed? Jeff > On Jan 24, 2017, at 6:54 PM, Roger Klorese <rogerklorese at gmail.com <mailto:rogerklorese at gmail.com>> wrote: > > I'd take the opposite approach and tell them no new mail will be received until they are under quota. > On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 4:52 PM SH Development

Hello, I have an interesting question. I can''t find a solution anywhere to this problem. I have an adsl connection which is able to send a full data packet in about 150ms. I want to cut this time down to decrease latency while serving files, so I thought I''d try and reduce the packet size for the offending upload streams (my webserver). The trick is that I also want all other

I don''t know whether this is the right place to ask, but kindly point me to an FM that I can R if it isn''t. My wife is creating lots of Kazaa traffic, and I am using rsync to create a full mirror of Red Hat''s FTP site, Aurora Linux FTP site, the LDP site, and some other stuff. Clearly, when one is moving well over 100GB over a 128 Kbps link, this is going to take a

Hi, I just installed wondershapper 1.1a on my ipcop firewall box. I have roadrunner cable with a ftp server setup. My download speed is 2mbit (I get 225 KBytes) and my upload is 384kbit (I send at 43 KBytes). What should the settings in wshaper? I can ping yahoo.com at 90msec with little traffic.....and at around 220msec with full upload traffic. Mark

Season Greetings to all Tom, in your faq, u have this noted: While I am currently using the HTB version of The Wonder Shaper (I just copied wshaper.htb to /etc/shorewall/tcstart and modified it as shown in the Wondershaper README), I treid this with wondershaper, using Bearing Leaf 1.0 stable i even changed the tc command to run_tc, and tried it in both angles, and i receive the following..

greetings all, i''ve searched high and low for this, but can''t seem to find an answer anywhere.. having read the docs and the wondershaper script itself, it occurred to me that the documentation promises an immediate drop in interactive app latency, specifically mentioning SSH as a big winner. however, looking through the script i can''t really tell just *how*