similar to: Using tcng to create a basic DiffServ router

Hello, As we know that there are four kinds of AF in diffserv architecture, and each kind has three different priorities. So, there are 12 different kinds of AF, is it right? Of course, each AF has its recommended DSCP value. Then, we know the AF is classified into four differnt classes, such as AF1, AF2, AF3, and AF4. But in a Diffserv domain, and in the core router, there will be a classifier

Hi, just wondering if this type of configuration would be possible for using AF and EF classes. HTB (6.0M) --GRED 5 (AF1) --HTB(1M) [is it possible to have this with a 1M rate and a 6M ceiling?] --GRED [3 greds using grio] VQ1 -3 --GRED 4 (AF2) --HTB(1M) --GRED VQ1 -3 --GRED 3 (AF3) --HTB(1M)

ALL: <<diffserv-gred_10-06>> I have attached the current script that I am using. $TC qdisc add dev $EDEV parent 2:20 gred setup DPs 3 default 2 grio $TC qdisc change dev $EDEV parent 2:20 gred DP 1 limit $lim min $minTh max $maxTh avpkt $avgPL burst $bursty bandwidth $netBand probability 0.02 prio 2 $TC qdisc change dev $EDEV parent 2:20 gred DP 2 limit $lim min $minTh max

Hi all, I am running R 2.5.0 under Windows XP Media Center Edition. Here's a problem that's been stumping me for a few days now, and I can't find anything useful in the archives. I am using voronoi.mosaic (tripack package) to create proximity polygons for a study of vegetation competition and dynamics. The points lists are read in from a file for each plot, then 8 duplicates

All: I am tasked with creating an environment in which DiffServ and IP precedence is handled as close to RFC specification as possible. I have a few problems with implementing this based on current queueing structure. Here are a few of my questions. 1.) Is there any way to get DiffServ AF drop levels without using DSMARK and GRED? Ex. AF11 Gred DP 1 AF12 Gred DP 2 AF13 Gred DP 3 2.)

hi below is sysvinit script for handling tcng-script .... please excuse my bad bash skils, correct me where i''m doing stupid things :") what is left... many things, if i have time i will implement them too : - start [devices] - and then correct handling of service lock files i.e. per device lock file - stats blah ... - all ideas are welcome !! - test or some such, i mean the

Hi, There is some extra information in this email! I am working on implementing Diffserv on linux project. I am using suse 8.0 professional kernel 2.4.21. I have the following RPM:iproute2-2.4.7-697.rpm This supports a number of linux qdisc like cbq, htb among many others but it has no support for DSMARK, which I wish to use. Does anyone know of any patch that I could used or any other solution

Hi guys, I am working on implementing Diffserv on linux project. I am using suse 8.0 professional kernel 2.4.21. I have the following RPM:iproute2-2.4.7-697.rpm This supports a number of linux qdisc like cbq, htb among many others but it has no support for DSMARK, which I wish to use. Does anyone know of any patch that I could used or any other solution so that use of dsmark is possible. Traffic

hi all, i''m having problems building a module from my tcng configuration file. could someone verify the syntax for building a kernel module? i did it as shown below ... module gets built but i cannot load it. thanks charles ps -- sorry, don''t know c++ :-) [root]# cat /etc/tcng.test #define LAN "eth0" #define LAN_INGRESS 750000 #define LAN_EGRESS 750000 dev

I have a Gentoo Linux (kernel 2.6.11) server. Several months ago, I made a traffic shaping setup for my box (running a 2.4 kernel then) that worked beautifully. It gave high priority to SSH and RealAudio traffic, and put HTTP downloading traffic on a lower prio so they could only use what bandwidth was left. However, I''ve only just realized that tc is no longer accepting the commands I

I''m successfully using HTB + GRED to shape traffic based on the DSCP field. I would like to strip the DSCP and possibly replace it with normal ToS bits on egress traffic leaving my network. Leaving DSCP set is pointless, and could potentially cause problems with some ISPs that use DSCP internally I suppose. Setting ToS bits would seem ideal as most networks still honor it to varying

Hi! I am learning tcng without having experiance of tc and I am trying to build something that shall schedule traffic dependent on the value in the IPv4 packets ip_ttl field. I have read the tcng reference manual and cannot find information about forwarding. Is it possible to farward packets from ingress to egress without sending them upwards in layers?

Hi everyone, I had a question about linux qos using the tc command. I''m sorry if I''m mailing to the wrong list. I''d appreciate any redirection to the right one. What I want to do is to converge several flows. Is this possible with Linux ?I only found examples that fan out, like the tree structure. And was wondering if it''s possible to converge it.

Thank you for your help. It generates this script : tc qdisc add dev eth0 handle 1:0 root htb default 2 tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:0 classid 1:1 htb rate 75000bps ceil \ 75000bps tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:0 classid 1:2 htb rate 125000bps tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1:0 protocol all prio 1 u32 match u32 \ 0xa000001 0xffffffff at 12 classid 1:1 But I thought it was necessary to

Hi all, I want to apply traffic control using TCNG 1.30 on a NAT router. Can I use the IP addresses on my LAN to shape the traffic on the outgoing interface, with other words, does the address translation take place before or after traffic control? (Or does it depend and if so, on what?) Groeten, Joost Kraaijeveld Askesis B.V. Molukkenstraat 14 6524NB Nijmegen tel: 024-3888063 / 06-51855277

Greetings all, OK - just started playing around with traffic shaping - have imq and htb and (I think) everything else I need in the kernel and running well. My initial lab task was to protect a H.323 session over a simulated half T1 while adding bulk traffic - got that accomplished after slogging through learning tc and decided in short order that a more intuitive interface would be

Hello all, This is just a self-aggrandizing note to inform you all that my rather brief introduction to traffic control using tcng and HTB is available now on TLDP. http://tldp.org/HOWTO/Traffic-Control-tcng-HTB-HOWTO/ I welcome any criticism. -Martin -- Martin A. Brown --- SecurePipe, Inc. --- mabrown@securepipe.com _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list /

Hello. I have been trying to duplicate these u32 matching rules using TCNG, but without much success: tc filter add dev eth0 protocol ip parent 1:0 prio 1 u32\ match ip protocol 6 0xff \ match u8 0x05 0x0f at 0 \ match u16 0x0000 0xffc0 at 2 \ match u8 0x10 0xff at 33 \ flowid 1:10 Wondershaper 1.1a implements this and if I run it things seem to be shaped as expected. But this TCNG

In the bufferbloat age, anything that can make for a kinder, gentler bulk transfer protocol seems desirable. This add support for user and server selectable congestion control algorithms. As examples: --congestion-alg=lp # For the tcp-lp algorithm on the command line Or in a subsection: [mystuff] congestion alg = westwood # for a wireless connection And diffserv support: --diffserv=8 for

Hi folks I have created a script file (dsmark+policing.sh attached) to check graphic an text outputs of simutations, against original examples/dsmark+policing coding (see TCNG Reference Manual-pg.90). It uses tcng coding (*.tcsim file attached) and old tc coding (*.tcsim_old file attached) inserted in tcsim files. Observation 1: The graphic outputs from (*.tc included in *.tcsim) and (*.tc_old