similar to: Need cbq or htb optimal solution

Hi, Is there any tested good HTB script for traffic shaping available like as that of CBQ available at. http://freshmeat.net/projects/cbq.init I am n new bie and need to work on htb. -- Regards, M Arman _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc

Hi all, I have a similar question like many asked before I know but Please help as i cant figure out where the problem is and how should I tackle. I have 2 ISP connections. I want to share the bandwidth from both. I have copied the script from many places and created my own after changes. Problem is that only one connection is utilized at a time. Not both working. ratio of consuming

Hello, Does anyone know when one should use cbq versus (simpler more accurate) htb? Specifically does cbq have added functionality that may be of interest to certain applications? from htb home> Both CBQ and HTB help you to control the use of the outbound bandwidth on a given link. Both allow you to use one physical link to simulate several slower links and to send different kinds of

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, what''s the diferences between HTB and CBQ? Bye - -- ======================================== Netsite S/A - Security Officer Profissional Certificado Conectiva Linux www.kidmumu.com.br - UIN 4553082 ======================================== -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see

Hi all , does Kernel 2.4 supports CBQ and HTB by default or we have to recompile it. Regards Fahad Khan _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

Hello Thilo, What did you find superior with CBQ-wondershaper over HTB-wondershaper? We have not been using wondershaper specifically but our simple tests so far seem to show that htb is much easier to configure for a given target shape (i.,e accurate) compared to CBQ. Torsten -----Original Message----- From: Thilo Schulz [mailto:arny@ats.s.bawue.de] Sent: Saturday, June 14, 2003 8:55 AM To:

Ok, this has been kicking my @$$ for weeks. I'm trying to get some kind of bandwidth shaping working on my server. I need to throttle ftp down so as not to suck up all the available bandwidth. I had cbq working on the old server (an ancient RH 6.2 box) so I figured I'd just move the config over and get cbq.init from sf.net and it should work. Unfortunately it doesn't. At least

Hello, I''am successful using a linux (2.4.20) bridge and the cbq.init_v0.7 script for traffic shaping. But I can only use the queuing discipline tbf (LEAF=tbf). If I try use queuing discipline sfq or none then tc applies the rules but no shaping occurs. Is this problem a normal behavior when using bridging ? I tried to use htb.init (using patched tc binary). It accepts the rules but

If I create a cbq qdisc as a leaf of a cbq class, the bandwith rate is the same of the root cbq qdisc or the rate of the cbq class? Does exist the parameter rate on the "tc qdisc add" for cbq command? tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1:0 cbq bandwidth 10mbit avpkt 1000 cell 8 tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:0 classid 1:3 cbq bandwidth 10mbit rate 50kbit allot 1514 cell 8

Hi, I''m work on traffic shaping and I would like to know if it''s possible to mix differents Queueing Disciplines ?? I would like to combine the proporties of a PRIO discipline with that of a CBQ discipline. I read some documentation and I found nothing about that, can you help me ? I think to try something like that : tc qdisc add dev $DEV root handle 1: cbq … tc class add dev

Hello all. I''ve been struggling to QoS VoIP at our site and have a successful implementation at this point. Basically I had to set aside enough bandwidth for VoIP by placing all other traffic behind an HTB (multiple classes and queues behind it). Everything is fine. Here''s the diagram: ------- | eth | ------- | --------

Hi, In my LAN Iam trying to make following setup: - All the traffic generated by 10.0.2.1 should go to 10.0.2.11, If the destination of this traffic is internet than it should be placed on its interface eth1. Outgoing traffic on eth1 should be shaped.For this I am using fw filters and cbq. _______ 10.0.2.1 -------> 10.0.2.11(eth0 )----| A

Hi i need a cbq configuration that works and drops packets if the flow exceeds an amount of data.. Do u have any configuration that drops packets...? My cbq configuraion doesnt drop packets... The traffic use the correct class but seems that tha cbq is not able to control correct the flow __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site!

Hello, I'm usign Kernel 2.2.19 with ext3 0.0.7b patches. I'm also using cbq to control bandwidth. The cbq is correctly creating the classes and queueing disciplines but, whenever I call cbq stop I get a kernel panic: > Aiee, killing interrupt handler > Kernel panic: Attempted to kill idle task! > In interrupt handler - not syncing The exact line in cbq script that is

Hi Stef and Alexey I have read some documents about CBQ algorithm from http://www.icir.org/floyd/cbq.html but still have some question about CBQ in Linux . 1. First estimator can estimate how much bandwidth already USED per class. one estimating algorithm is EWMA (exponential weighted moving average), how about Linux implemenatation about estimator? also do you have link for this algorithm? I

Hello, Just wondering, from what I have been reading, would using the word bounded solve my problem? I have not actually tried using bounded yet, I will asap, however from what I understand it only applies to classes? I simply have 2 cbq files, cbq-1200.internal, and cbq-1200.external, both of which are identical except one says eth1 instead of eth0. Within each file I have :

Hi everyone, This is on a linux box, ingress (eth1) at 100Mb/s and egress (eth0) at 10Mb/s. The purpose is to test CBQ Here is my script ------------------------------------------------------------------- # Root qdisc tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1:0 cbq bandwidth 9Mbit \ avpkt 1000 cell 8 # Classes tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:0 classid 1:1 cbq bandwidth 9Mbit \ rate 5Mbit weight

Hi, I am looking working (!) qdisc that would guarantee preferential treatment to priority (ex voice traffic). It is supposed to work as LLQ (Cisco) which means it is PQ but with bandwidth limited for EF PHB traffic. I did lots of tests with CBQ and prio set to 1 for EF PHB and prio 2 for best effort. Although delay does not look like being guaranteed at all for priority traffic. Eventually I

Sub:[LARTC] cbq init for one port on a subnet Hello, We use cbq.init to limit bandwidth. It works great on a per-user basis. Now I''d like to limit traffic from a netblock to the Internet on port 6699. Network is 192.168.0.160 mask 255.255.255.224 eth0 is the gateway eth1 connects the netblock in question Is this the proper syntax; DEVICE=eth0,10Mbit,1Mbit RATE=100Kbit

Hello everyone, I''m a newbie experimenting with CBQ shaping and am facing a few problems. Can any of you please help? TEST SETUP: +---------------+ +----------------+ | 10.0.0.103 |----------->| 10.0.0.102 | +---------------+ +----------------+ 10.0.0.103: Linux, 100Mbit/s NIC 10.0.0.102: Windows, 100Mbit/s NIC, iperf tcp server (ports 2000 and 2001) WHAT I