similar to: tc-htb traffic shaping script

HI All , I am running a FC6 box with two internet links with load balance . Every thing is working fine expect the MSN connection that failed and reconnect every time and SSL connections . I would link to know if with the nona howto I could fix that . I have been tried with no success to redirect that connection only to one link but its look like do not work . Here my configuration :

Hi, this might be a dumb question, but I''m not finding much information online. I''m trying to setup a 2.6 linux box to run nat across multiple upstream links as a simple way to aggregate bandwidth. I found the instructions in lartc section 4.2 (http://lartc.org/howto/lartc.rpdb.multiple-links.html) fairly clear and straightforward. I implemented those, and a couple of trivial

Hi. I´m making an script for load balancing of two cablemodems internet connections toward my LAN. The problem is that when I try to ''equalize'' the the two internet connections with the weight=1 it doesn´t work. On the other hand, if I put 5 and 5 it works, but not at 100%, it does intermittlently, some times works and others don´t. example: ip route add default equalize\

Hi All, I''m a big user of the LARTC document but am currently stuck with a question around section 4.2 (http://lartc.org/howto/lartc.rpdb.multiple-links.html) in relation to "Routing for multiple uplinks/providers". I''m wanting to do a similar setup to the diagram where I have - lets just say for the moment - two uplink providers where I want to route over two

i´ve been searching for a load balance solution since a month ago... what i can say is that it simply doesn´t work. I was unable to find one guy that did it with sucess. When "load balance" is the subject of the message on the list, the message is simply ignored. So... if it doesn´t work... why LARTC don´t delete it from the HOW TO and answer us with some "it simply doesn´t

hi all, we were trying to configure our system with 2 ethernet catds connected to two different providers using iproute2 so that it recieves and transmits data from both of them. We have followed the configuration as given on lartc''s howto But the most wierd part of the story is that after we restart the system (We have put the script in rc.local) the system works fine and we can ping

Hi all, I have read and done the LARTC HOW-to and almost everything work''s execpt from the inside network. When load balancing over the two access it only work on the linux router/nat machine 1) I am running stock mandrake kernel 2.6.8.1-12mdk and using stock shorewall config 2.0.8 2) I have two internet link and two internals link. Load balance setup work for the linux router/nat

I''m looking for a way to shape all traffic on a virtual vlan interface, say eth1.100 to a max of 100mbit. The box is a quagga router with eth0 on the inside and vlan interfaces on the eth1 card to our upstream partners. Each partner has his own vlan on eth1. I tried shaping but was only able to shape outbound traffic on the eth1.100 interface. Inbound shaping was also possible, but

Hello all, I have a linux router with 2 interfaces(eth0 - ISP and eth1 - LAN). I''ve established a VPN connection(openvpn) over eth0 with a friend of mine => tun0 interface. I want half of my LAN to have Internet access through the eth0 interface and the other half through the tun0 interface. I''ve set up a script like the "load balancing split access" instructions

Hello Im having a problem similar to sawar Here is my configuration --------------eth1---192.168.1.128---------- -------------192.168.1.1 ISP router 1 | my | ---Eth0---192.168.10.157----| | | linux |

I am setting to a shorewall system with 4 NIC''s as per the outline specification below. Can anyone please have a look and let me know what I have missed and what I have got wrong as I want to take this system live ASAP but do not want to kill internet access and the hosting for too long ! I have listed below the system outline & have attached the config files that I have changed, if

Hi guys, I''m not sure where to post for help on this one, shorewall or lvs, I''ll start with shorewall (only cause Tom is a gun at this stuff, and is polite enough to tell me to bugger off to the LVS list if I''m posting in the wrong one ;) I have a single box that is my router/firewall/LVS. Internet -- eth0 - router/firewall - eth1 --- internal lan | eth2

Hi, I read the howto of iproute, I have the same case with HOWTO, the difference is that the whole incoming traffic goes through interface 0, the other difference is that I do not want to balance the out going traffic, because I have specific networks to take it throughout another interface. Mi Case IF1 --> Input and Output IF2 --> Only aoutput for three Network I need Help, How can I

Hi everybody, I have a theoretical question here. A 128K stream is a 128 KiloBITS (NOT kiloBYTES) per second stream; am I right? Is a 512k internet connection a 512 kiloBITS or 512 kiloBYTES connection? 128 KiloBITS = 16 KiloBYTES (8 bits = 1 byte). I am wondering if a 512k connection (upload and download) could THEORITICALLY handle 4 (512/128) or 32 (512/16) 128k streams? I am confused

If you look at the PLS file for SomaFM's "Goove Salad" channel you'll see : ------------------------------------------------ [playlist] numberofentries=3 File1=http://64.236.34.97:80/stream/1018 Title1=SomaFM Presents: Groove Salad 128k (Feed #1) Length1=-1 File2=http://205.188.245.133:8076 Title2=SomaFM Presents: Groove Salad 128k (Feed #2) Length2=-1

----- Original Message ----- From: "Jerry Vonau" <jvonau@shaw.ca> To: "Mailing List for Shorewall Users" <shorewall-users@lists.shorewall.net> Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2004 08:06 Subject: Re: [Shorewall-users] Two Links and DNAT > > > > Btw, by "shorewall show nat" I just noticed that I was doing snat only > > for packets comming

Hi, I have a client connected to the ''net through 3 ISP''s. Have set up a Linux box to do routing and load sharing for the 3 connections. A fourth interface is connected to the LAN with private IP addresses. Am using iptables to SNAT traffic to the appropriate IP depending on the interface the packet gets routed onto. The setup looks something like this: Interface IP

Hello everyone, I''m a newbie experimenting with CBQ shaping and am facing a few problems. Can any of you please help? TEST SETUP: +---------------+ +----------------+ | 10.0.0.103 |----------->| 10.0.0.102 | +---------------+ +----------------+ 10.0.0.103: Linux, 100Mbit/s NIC 10.0.0.102: Windows, 100Mbit/s NIC, iperf tcp server (ports 2000 and 2001) WHAT I

Hi to everybody. I read some info and documentation but i still can''t find how to make this simple setup for example . I just want to make priority of certain traffic without shaping the traffic . For example SSH and RDP first priority Mail second priority WEB and FTP third And everything else last priority. What will be the simple and best way to achieve this. I will appreciate

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52 ------- Additional Comments From stewart@gammasolutions.com 2003-02-19 04:02 ------- Created an attachment (id=3) routing setup ------- Additional Comments From stewart@gammasolutions.com 2003-02-19 04:03 ------- Created an attachment (id=4) iptables script (for iptables-restore) ------- Additional Comments From