similar to: gw, lsrc in julian''s patches

Hi All It''s been just over two weeks since LSRC 6 tickets went on sale, and it is already over half full. And now, it''s just 16 days to go for LSRC 6. That''s right, two weeks and two days from now you can see Laurent Sansonetti of RubyMotion fame, Uncle Bob Martin, and, best of all, Matz! The Lone Star Ruby Conference is being held Aug 9-11 in Austin, TX, at Norris

Hi We have applied the routing patches from http://www.ssi.bg/%7Eja/#routes. To 2.6.15 this seems to have broken our output natting. Has anyone else experienced this or any advice on how to fix. Is this working on the newer kernel i.e. 2.6.19 ? Any help would be appreciated. -- Tim Haak email: tim@haak.co.uk cel: 0837787100 First love is only a little foolishness and a lot of curiosity,

Hey All Capital Factory is organizing a Hackathon in conjuction with LSRC 6. If you want to attend, please cast your votes on the survey link below. http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/BFYFJBJ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to

Hello, I have finished setting up the load balancer with IPROUTE ... also patch the kernel to support DGD and now it''s working fine with the valuable guide at LARTC website, Julian Anastasov, and the kind people in this mailing list. Now I would like to launch a web server and a ftp server to the public but I''m stuck into a problem and really need your help. Currently internal

I used to run the julian function from chron but this new version of R has also a julian function in the base package that doesn't do exactly what I need. Is there a way of telling R to run the function from chron and not from base? Thanks, Fernando __________________________ Fernando Colchero Doctoral Fellow Duke University Department of Ecology

IMHO, i believe that it would be more realistic to have one router providing load balancing/dead gateway to one/several subnet(s). otherwise, each server/user would have to do their own load balancing for each subnet! that, or you would need 3 routers, one for each subnet and a linux router doing the load balancing in the middle. with 3 routers, the load balancing configurations

With 2.4.28 and Julian Anastasov''s http://www.ssi.bg/~ja/routes-2.4.27-9.diff patch, I get the following when I attempt to build my kernel. Any ideas? Thanks! gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/src/linux/include -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wno-trigraphs -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-common -fomit-frame-pointer -pipe -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -march=i686 -fno-unit-at-a-time -nostdinc

Hello all, My question: - - - - - - - Does anybody know when the reverse path filtering occurs as the packet traverses the kernel? Does it happen before NF_IP_PRE_ROUTING (PREROUTING) or not? Does it only happen at route selection time? What I have tried to do to find the answer: - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I find a posting (from many years ago) [0], which suggests that this

Disclaimer: I've setup APC UPS monitoring and it works... ... but when it comes to mustek powermust 600usb (connected via com-port), I can't make it work. Got NUT installed via aptitude in ubuntu feisty and a basic setup, exactly the same as for the apc, except for the name of the ups and the corresponding section of ups.conf -- [mustek] driver = megatec port = /dev/ttyS1

Hi William. Thanks a lot for your help. Im having some trouble recompiling my kernel after a installed the patch. Im running RH 7.3 with kernel 2.4.18-3. The patch I installed is routes-2.4.16-6.diff. I got no errors installing it. I added the multipath support, and recompiled it. The make dep and the make bzImage went fine. I got error during the make modules. These are the errors:

Hello This is friendly reminder about the speaker submission deadline. The deadline is Sunday, May 3 at midnight. We have extended it one day to give you the weekend to submit your proposal. If you plan on submitting a proposal, please use the link below. We look forward to seeing you at the conference in August. Please feel free to email us with your suggestions on how we can make this your

I have a doubt. If you use such a script monitoring the link status with ping and then reconfiguring, why do you need the DGD patch? You need to do some reconfiguration (change multipath to a single default route) anyway if you use the script, right? Also, the DGD patch uses src to lookup the routing table entry, but if you have a dynamic IP for the WAN interface (PPPoE, DHCP etc), this approach

Hi All, I have one query which may be quite silly. My Linux internet gateway has Dead Gateway Detetction patches applied to it''s kernel. If I am right, the DGD patches allow us to add static routes which are not destroyed even if the interface or the link goes down. I want to know whether, with the DGD patches applied, the traffic shaping rules defined using tc, added to an interface

We're at the point in our port of OpenVMS to x86 using LLVM to make choices on mcmodel. Given OpenVMS's history, our linker will allocate static data (ie, .data, .bss, .plt, GOT, etc.) in the bottom 32-bits of address space (ie, 00000000.xxxxxxxx). However, we support code anywhere in the 64-bit address space as PIC code (we do this on Itanium today using our own code-generator and

Greetings, I wanted to ask the list a question about dead gateway detection. I''ve followed the wonderful writeup by Christoph Simon on how to use Julians patch for dgd on two loadballanced connections, but I don''t want them loadballanced. How can I setup two default gateways but always have one be the preference unless it goes down. Once the dgd code sees that have it switch

Hi all iam trying to setup Dual gate using Julian patch DGD, but when i try tp patch to my kernel with fedora iam getting the following eroor can some one suggest me what is wrong or i need a latest patch for fedora [root@linux-2.4.22-1.2115.nptl]# patch -p1 < /root/update/update/routes-2.4.20-9.diff patching file include/linux/netfilter_ipv4/ip_nat.h patching file

Hello all! I applied http://www.ssi.bg/~ja/routes-2.6.8-10.diff patch to kernel 2.6.8.1 and it works fine, or almost fine. It does the load balancing well, but when one link is dropped it continues to try it. At the end of http://www.ssi.bg/~ja/nano.txt it is said to ping gateway 1 and gateway 2, for the kernel to know if that route is working, but since my linux is connected to the links

Greetings from Austin - Home of the Lone Star Ruby Conference. This year we are catering to your every desire. In addition to the customary luxuries you have come to expect at LSRC, like the awesome food or the power strips at every table for your hungry laptops, this year you will also be greeted with: * the new conference center sound system. * bagels, yogurt, fruit and donuts for every

Hello list, I want a set-up with a satellite link (eth0) and a cellular cdma link (ppp0) coming into a linux box with a LAN (eth1 or wlan0) to be able to route first through the satellite when it''s on, or else the cdma when it''s in range. Load sharing is not critical, but it would be nice. The satellite has a static IP, the cdma is dynamic. Both WANs are

I''m sure that I had found (and printed out ...) a really good tutorial that explain how to use Julian Anastasov''s routing patch, but I can''t seem to find it now. Any pointers? -- ****************************************************************** Glen W. Mabey Glen.Mabey@usu.edu http://mabeys.homelinux.com/glen/