Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "how to prioritize by client ip instead of protocol"
2006 Dec 06
19
Iptables matching on IFB
Hey folks,
I stumbled across the Mastershaper project
( http://www.mastershaper.org/ ) but I have a little problem:
I wanted to shape the traffic coming from the router itself aswell as
coming from the LAN behind the router, for that task I need IMQ, but
with IMQ iptables-(layer7)-matching is not possible. Now I''ve talked
with the programmer and he said the following:
>The problem is
2007 Jun 24
5
ESFQ: request for user input
Hello,
I haven''t been keeping up with sending ESFQ [ANNOUNCE] messages to this
list, but I''ve still been working on the patch. If you''re curious about
recent changes, take a look at the home page, ChangeLog, and README:
http://fatooh.org/esfq-2.6/
http://fatooh.org/esfq-2.6/current/ChangeLog
http://fatooh.org/esfq-2.6/current/README
Meanwhile, I''m interested
2005 Apr 01
2
[ANNOUNCE] ESFQ for Linux 2.6.12-rc1
http://fatooh.org/esfq-2.6/
http://fatooh.org/esfq-2.6/esfq-2.6.12-rc1.tar.gz
This version no longer interferes with the original SFQ; unlike previous
versions, you can still use an unpatched tc with SFQ. Patching tc is
still needed for ESFQ, though. I''ve tested this patch with Linux 2.6.11
as well.
Please tell me if you have any problems. I''m subscribed to lartc again.
-Corey
2007 Oct 29
6
Fair que between 255 users
Hello guys
I have a subnet with 255 users, which need to share 1 single slow internet
connection, so i would like to implement a kind of *fair queuing *on the
UPLOAD between them, which means that they all share the connection
equally..
The tools that i have available is: A linux box with IPROUTE2,HTB and TC..
I have looked at some examples, and my first idea was to make 255 entries in
2005 Oct 24
1
[ANNOUNCE] ESFQ for Linux 2.6.13
In a recent thread on this list, Robert Kurjata provided me a patch to add
hashing by iptables mark to the Linux 2.4 version of ESFQ. Thanks to that
contribution, I was able to easily add support to the 2.6 port I maintain.
I found out, however, that the existing hash algorithm results in a lot of
colllisions when the range of hashed values is small. The purturbation
spreads the collisions out a
2007 Jan 23
1
[ANNOUNCE] ESFQ for Linux 2.6.19.2 (with jhash!)
ESFQ''s original hashing algorithm never worked particularly well for the
src or dst hash types: close IP addresses, such as 10.0.0.1 and 10.0.0.2
often hashed to the same number, even with many different perturbation
values. This prevented the src and dst hash types from working
adequately with small and medium-sized network ranges.
A while ago, I added the src_direct and dst_direct hash
2005 Dec 14
3
exact rate
Hello
I am using htb (krenel 2.6.14.3 + esfq patch from fatooh.org) to limit the
bandwidth. But I want the absolute maximum rate to be for example 5Mbit
and not to exceed it.
here is the script:
$tc qdisc add dev ${NETIF} root handle 1 htb r2q 4
$tc class add dev ${NETIF} parent 1: classid 1:21 htb rate 5Mbit ceil 5Mbit
$tc class add dev ${NETIF} parent 1:21 classid 1:101 htb rate 2Mbit ceil
2006 Apr 12
7
ESFQ not so fair?
Hello!
I am using since yesterday ESFQ instead of N HTB queues. It mostly
works OK, but when somebody is using one single sesion (for example
downloading file via FTP), it gets weird speed. For example it is 20
kilobytes pres second, then drops down to 9, then 20 again, and then
slowly to 0 and stops. But when using download accelererator of some
kind or bittorrent client which uses many
2005 May 26
3
compile error while patching iproute2 with esfq
Hi!
I''m getting this error while I try to compile iproute2-2.6.11-050330:
gcc -D_GNU_SOURCE -O2 -Wstrict-prototypes -Wall -I../include
-DRESOLVE_HOSTNAMES -DCONFIG_GACT -DCONFIG_GACT_PROB -c -o q_esfq.o q_esfq.c
q_esfq.c: In function `esfq_parse_opt'':
q_esfq.c:45: error: structure has no member named `hash_kind''
q_esfq.c:45: error: `TCA_SFQ_HASH_CLASSIC''
2007 May 16
1
tcng + esfq
FYI,
i''ve just created a quick patch adding esfq (Enhanced Stochastic
Fairness queueing discipline) for tcng (Traffic Control Next
Generation).
Patch is located at http://devel.dob.sk/tcng+esfq.
Enjoy.
Sam
2007 Mar 20
3
Fairness queuing across a range of IP addresses
I have a block of IP addresses (2048) used for ADSL connections to
customers.
In order to provide a fair slice of available bandwidth on the contended
services I would like to be able to set up some kind of SFQ filter, but
using a hash of the destination IP address rather than the the full
source and destination ip and port. This would be done at the Internet
side gateway for traffic being
2005 Oct 15
5
esfq ? or wrr ?
Hi
If I have a HTB class with 128kbit, and I want to
put "N" users in that class ( in order to share
bandwidth fairly ) ,
which is better for me ? esfq (hash dst) or wrr ?
I would attach esfq or wrr to HTB parent class.
Also I''ve readed on Jim script that over WRR put
a RED qdisc, but I don''t understand it.
bests
andres
2004 Feb 26
1
ESFQ Modification
Hi!
Some time ago I faced a problem in limiting traffic on host with
multiple uplinks. Since all the stuff worked nice seemed that there
will be no problems. But then I realized that P2P users are smart
enough to bypass limits as sfq doesn''t give fair sharing in this case
(thousands of connections from one user versus few from the other).
I tried IMQ but it''s instability in my
2004 May 14
9
RV: LATENCY PROBLEMS
Hello there,
I''m having lots of problems with my setup here. Let me explain:
I am network administrator for my university dorm. We are about 300 users,
and we have 2 ADSL connections doing load balancing with 300kbits upstream
and 2Mbit downstream.
The load balancing is working great, we are doing connection tracking so I
can mark and hence prioritize interactive traffic and ACKS
2001 Jan 07
3
Prioritize SSH and telnet
Hi routing-experts !
If I want to prioritize up ssh and telnet traffic with Linux 2.4 netfilter
and iproute2. I''ve set outbound tcp 22, 23 and 21 TOSbits to minimize delay,
but this doesn''t seem to be enough to prioritize ssh over for example
http-traffic.
I''m using modem to connect to Internet and got an entire LAN behind the
Linux router/firewall. Well, I think most
2005 Jan 04
11
ESFQ?
Hi again,
I was just looking around for ESFQ sources, and I see that the main site
is down, and only has kernel 2.6.4 patches.
Is ESFQ maintained? If so, where can I find patches for 2.6.10?
Thanks,
-justin
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
2006 Sep 05
3
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4082] New: RFE: prioritize work by size (or other criteria)
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4082
Summary: RFE: prioritize work by size (or other criteria)
Product: rsync
Version: 2.6.9
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: core
AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org
ReportedBy:
2002 Oct 04
2
Thousands of classes, BW throttling and prioritizing??
Hello,
I need to limit the bandwidth to 1Mbit per user IP (and never give more)
and inside of each 1Mbit prioritize minimum-delay traffic (video stream
from specific servers, so I mangle TOS for packets from those). The
problem is I need this for *thousands* of users. I am guessing thousands
of classes are needed, but the question is, is this feasible? Could one
machine ever handle this? How
2007 Jul 09
1
Help with traffic control (HTB ESFQ RED)
Hello, there''s a problem I''ve had for several months now, and I''ve never
been able to find an answer to it. I''ll try to explain as quick as possible:
I have a server that controlls my home network, it provides internet
to them also (NAT) and I would like to provide QoS by shaping traffic. I
have a p2p server here (running mldonkey), since only that
2003 Aug 08
1
Looking for a good htb traffic shaping script to prioritize incoming traffic
I am looking for a good htb traffic shaping script to prioritize incoming
traffic over outgoing traffic for my machine. I have a 100mbit line, ftp
up, backup data comming in, but whenever mirrors starts grabbing it they use
all the traffic and the backup data comming in (the important data) drops to
like 300kb/sec. I was thinking some script doing
sleep 60
[if downstream > 1mb/sec, limit