similar to: Does someone have an nf-hipac patch for 2.6.20 kernel ?

Hi all, http://www.hipac.org/index.htm I have just discovered this great project. It seems it surpasses standard netfilter in performance. The documentation states they are more or less compatible with standard netfilter, but anybody has tested if it is compatible with shorewall? Tom, have you? Regards -- Jaime Nebrera - jnebrera@eneotecnologia.com Consultor TI - ENEO Tecnologia SL

Hey folks, I stumbled across the Mastershaper project ( http://www.mastershaper.org/ ) but I have a little problem: I wanted to shape the traffic coming from the router itself aswell as coming from the LAN behind the router, for that task I need IMQ, but with IMQ iptables-(layer7)-matching is not possible. Now I''ve talked with the programmer and he said the following: >The problem is

Hi; First, sorry if this question is mostly netfilter related, than lartc, but I think you guys may have a your opinion about this. I''m using Linux 2.4.x with netfilter packet filtering / NAT on our front-end firewalls (P500 with 1Gb RAM), which are filtering traffic going to our Public Web Sites. The traffic is growing very fast since several months.. The average traffic filtered by

... Is there anyone, who has worked with HiPAC? (http://www.hipac.org/) The project seems interesting, but orphaned. -- Peter V. Saveliev

Hi there! I am currently setting up a Xen box on 3 VLans, each VLan interface is in a bridge and currently, dom0 is reachable from on of these and is performing great. My only problem is with domU : it can ping anything but it won''t work for TCP and UDP protocol UNLESS I do a manual tcpdump on my vlan interface. Bridges on dom0: xen-vl97 8000.001372529fbf no

Hello I''ve setuped a bridge with iptables + layer + ipp2p + tc I don''t know how to shape passive ftp ? If I put rules on port 20, 21 or using layer 7 iptables accounting still empty ... When I done a tcpdump I can see that othe port than 20 or 21 are used ... Any Ideas of how I can achieve this ? Regards

hello,everyone I have installed bridge-utils.I want to combine bridge and iptables.But I can't get bridge-nf-0.0.7-against-2.4.18.diff . Who can tell me where i can get it? thanks! ???????? ???????? cd_xcl@sina.com

Hello List, Are there any known issues in using the bridge-nf patch for kernel v2.4.28 against 2.4.29 or can it be used in production environments? is there already an adopted version of the patch for 2.4.29? Sorry if this question has already been answered elsewhere (I didn't find something useful on google, cvs and the list). Thanks, Marc

Hello, I''ve setuped an ethernet bridge on a debian sarge 3.1 with l7-filter + ipp2 shapper rules The server is a supermicro p4sci + celeron pentium 4 base 3ghz + 512Mb + 2 ethernet e1000 One interface is connected to a cisco catalyst switch The other interface is connected directly to a CMTS (a sort of router for cable modem) configured as bridge too. More than 20Mbps of bandwith

Hi, I''ve just installed an openldap 2.3 inside a debian etch domU. Openldap is very very slow with db4.2, 4.3, ... and I dont'' why ??? I''ve updated my libc6 to a friendly xen version too ... but nothing ! I''ve found a post about this issue http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-users/2006-02/msg00179.html Any ideas to solve this issue ? Regards

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1266 Bug ID: 1266 Summary: bridge-nf-filter-pppoe-tagged mtu bug? Product: netfilter/iptables Version: linux-2.6.x Hardware: All OS: RedHat Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: bridging Assignee:

Hello I've got an Unitek UPS (650ipE) that use megatec driver ... I'm running Ubuntu 7.04 with a 2.6.20 kernel and nut 2.0.5-1 package Ubuntu by default use Udev and "hid", "usbhid", "evdev" kernel modules are loaded automatically The UPS is detected on system level but "upsdrvctl" can't access to the device ... Does anyone could give

Hiall! Is there un updated patch for bridge/nf/ebtables for 2.4.27? I tried the patch for 2.4.26 but there were several rejects. Then I patched in the rejects by hand and it zorked, at leqst for now. But to be sure I want someone with knowledge to update the patch instead of me nokey ;-) Best wishes Norbert -------------------------------------------------------------------------------

http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=751 Summary: IPv6 bridging bug Product: iptables Version: unspecified Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: Gentoo Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: ip6tables AssignedTo: netfilter-buglog at lists.netfilter.org ReportedBy: david at

Hi, I have just upgraded from the 1.8.1 to the 1.9.0 version of R, and have some trouble to run RWinEdt from the .Rprofile file (in the user folder). The script is: library(MASS) library(lattice) cat("Load editor?(y/n default = y): ") nf <- as.character(readLines(n = 1)) if ((nf=="y")|(nf=="Y")|(nf=="")) {library(RWinEdt)} rm(nf) When run at start,

The network-bridge script fails when setting a few sysctls which are only available if ebtables is present in the host kernel. Fix by ignoring the return value of the sysctl command. Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@qumranet.com> Index: xen/tools/examples/network-bridge =================================================================== --- xen/tools/examples/network-bridge (revision 991)

Hi Ady, Your insightful post prompted me to to a little bit more digging as to how the Ridgecrop algorithm computed its FAT size, with the result of my investigations presented below. NB: For those who don't want to go through this whole part, there's a TL;DR near the end. For reference, the computation of the FAT size all done in the GetFATSizeSectors(), the code of which is at [1]

Hi, I have host running 2.6.16 dom0 kernel (Gentoo based). All my domUs are using 2.6.16 custom compiled kernels. Now my question is - is it possible to use newer version for domUs, for example 2.6.20 FC6 domU kernel? BR Peter Braun _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

Hi all, Sorry for the inconvenient about the previous post. The files were not attached. So I put them here again. I am a newbie in LLVM and I am trying to replace the function like: old function || new function ============================== ========= int haha(int a) { int haha(int a, char* ID) { ===> }

Hi , I am getting errors while configuring libvirt to compile it from source. There is a error in libnl checking for UDEV... no checking whether to compile with macvtap support... yes checking whether to compile with virtual port support... no checking for LIBNL... no configure: error: libnl-devel >= 1.1 is required for macvtap support I have already installed the libnl library in /lib/