similar to: two NICs on the same subnet

Hello all, I am working with kernel 2.2.20 with the necessary options configured into the kernel to support all of the wonderfully fancy routing features: - routing based on ToS - routing based on fwmark - multiple routing tables This same kernel is in use elsewhere, and is routing based on fwmark with success. This leads me to believe that my kernel is OK and that I have another

Hi All, concerning the problem when running the "ip ru ls" command. I faced with the same problem, and I solved it by making sure to include the following settings into the kernel configuration (2.4.18): CONFIG_IP_ADVANCED_ROUTER=y <=== CONFIG_IP_MULTIPLE_TABLES=y <=== CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_FWMARK=y CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_NAT=y CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_MULTIPATH=y CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_TOS=y

I found that in my kernel config : # CONFIG_NET_KEY is not set CONFIG_INET=y CONFIG_IP_MULTICAST=y CONFIG_IP_ADVANCED_ROUTER=y CONFIG_IP_MULTIPLE_TABLES=y CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_FWMARK=y CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_MULTIPATH=y CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_VERBOSE=y # CONFIG_IP_PNP is not set # CONFIG_NET_IPIP is not set # CONFIG_NET_IPGRE is not set But no CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_MULTIPATH_CACHED. -----Message

Hi there. My name is Lucas and I''m from Argentina. Firstly, forgive me for my english since it is not my native languaje. Now, I''ve been reading on how to compile iproute2 and found that I need to add the following to my kernel, which in my case it is 2.4.20, and it is also the one which this document I read talked about: CONFIG_NETLINK=y CONFIG_RTNETLINK=y # CONFIG_NETLINK_DEV

Hi, I am trying to set up a uPnP server on a Linux box (Debian Sarge Stable kernel 2.6.8). uPnP works using multicast packages for locating servers. This does however seem to fail unless I set the relevant NIC in promiscuous mode. If I do so, it works well. I have added ip route add 224.0.0.0/4 dev eth0 and echo 1 >/proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward and the kernel is set up to enable

Hi , I am trying to set up a GRE tunnel between two linux routers. The routers have a 400 MHz Processor. Linux .2 65.0.0.2 Linux LAN1 -------- Router -------- INTERNET ---- Router ---- LAN2 10.10.10.0 .1 208.1.0.1 (Simulated) .1 .1 192.168.2.0/24 /24 Scripts to Create the tunnel ip tunnel add tun0 mode gre remote 65.0.0.1 local

hi all, am getting neighbour table overflow messages very often... Dec 9 09:59:54 ICG kernel: NET: 13 messages suppressed. Dec 9 09:59:54 ICG kernel: Neighbour table overflow. Dec 9 09:59:59 ICG kernel: NET: 12 messages suppressed. Dec 9 09:59:59 ICG kernel: Neighbour table overflow. how can i stop/reduce it ?? what factors does it depends on ?? kernel configuration are...

Yessssssssssssssssssss !! THANKSS it Works !!!! Thanks a lot, if you come to Lille,France I''ll Offer you a big Beer) Joffrey -----Message d''origine----- De : shorewall-users-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net [mailto:shorewall-users-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net] De la part de Tom Eastep Envoyé : jeudi 19 octobre 2006 21:46 À : Shorewall Users Objet : Re: [Shorewall-users] Tcrules

Hi, I''ve been trying out the wondershaper script, but on several of the examples I keep getting the error message:- RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument On the following line:- tc filter add dev eth0 parent ffff: protocol ip prio 50 u32 match ip src \ 0.0.0.0/0 police rate 512kbit burst 10k drop flowid :1 Based on other posts to this mail list, I gather it is an issue with kernel

Dear Alexey, Sorry to bother you with this small question about nexthop syntax failing, but I haven''t found anyone else who can answer it - including Matthew Marsh or those on the lartc mailing list. The problem, with 2.2.19 and 2.2.20 kernels and versions of iproute2 up to iproute2-2.2.4-now-ss001007 (the most recent that compiles for me), is that this command does not work: # ip ro

Hello, This is not really a shorewall problem. But just wanted to check if this problem rang a bell with any of you. I have a linux router with slackware 9.1, and kernel 2.4.27 Everyting works ok except for access to web sites that use akamai from behind the router. >From the router machine itself I can access those sites without problems. But machines behind nat, take forever to access

Hello, i´ve installed a Suse 8.1 minimal System with iproute 2.4.7 and iptables, Suse default Kernel 2.4.19. When I start the Wondershaper 1.1a Script I get the following Error: CBQ: "allot" is required to set WRR parameters. /home/skripte/./wshaper: line 72: allot: command not found CBQ: "allot" is required to set WRR parameters. /home/skripte/./wshaper: line 78: allot:

I have a linux server running Mandrake 10, with the kernel configured with "CONFIG_IP_ADVANCED_ROUTER=y CONFIG_IP_MULTIPLE_TABLES=y CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_MULTIPATH=y" options, with 4 ethernet cards: - 2 ethernet used to connect to my lan (eth0=192.168.1.x and eth1=192.168.2.x) - 2 ethernet used to internet connection (2 adsl lines, both with 600/300 kbtis) The two lan are used to share

Hello, I''m trying to configure a machine to send mail traffic out on eth0 and web traffic, via Squid, out of eth1, with the default gw on the eth0 interface. After spending most of the day of trying this and that and reading docs until my eye hurts, I have had zero luck making anything work expect for standard routing. The Advance Routing Howto makes it seams easy to do this, but I fear

Hello, I am attempting to implement load balancing on a firewall to allow me to use two ISPs. I have followed the instructions in section 4.2 of the LARTC HOWTO but have got stuck on the split access section I have the options CONFIG_IP_ADVANCED_ROUTER and CONFIG_IP_MULTIPLE_TABLES in my kernel (2.4.24) and have added routes to the /etc/iproute2/rt_tables file but when I try a command in the

I''m using htb classes on my firewall to queue traffic and implement different restrictions on different protocols. tc qdisc del dev eth0 root tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb default 190 tc class add dev eth0 parent 1: classid 1:3 htb rate 2mbit burst 30k tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:1 classid 1:90 htb rate 50kbit ceil 384kbit burst 5k tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 1:90 handle

Hi, I am getting the errors given below, when I am trying to add the prio to any table. What can be the problem and how can i resolve it.... Kindly help [root /root]# ip rule RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument Dump terminated [root /root]# ip rule list RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument Dump terminated [root /root]# ip rule list table main "ip rule show" need not eny arguments.

I have a connection to the Internet (on eth1), and over this I also have a PPTP tunnel set up (on ppp0). Temporarily I use the (slower) PPTP tunnel for everything, but I really just have to use it for some specific purposes, which are distinguishable by port. So, I want to direct only some specific ports to ppp0, using eth1 for the rest. I have tried following the instructions on

I have a 2.6.12(ubuntu-patchset), kernel recompiled with this routing options: [*] IP: advanced router [*] IP: policy routing [*] IP: equal cost multipath Load balancing is working great, but i have problems whits long term tcp flows (like msn-messenger or vpns or any other type of long term ip based conection). I assume this is because after a period of time, the per-host

hello, my name is Denny. I am new in this list. I am trying use multiple uplinks as describe in the lartc documentation (http://lartc.org/howto/lartc.rpdb.multiple-links.html) with squid transparent proxy in my gateway server. let me draw the configuration : /----------------- -----DSL1-----| \ |Transparent proxy |----Local network -----DSL2-----|