similar to: Question on traffic control

Hello, I am trying to use iptables together with tc I need to use IPMARK module of iptables, but I got a strange error after I run ''iptables -t mangle -A POSTROUTING -o eth0 -j IPMARK --addr=dst --and-mask=0xffff --or-mask=0x1000'' The command is copied from iptables manual itself (of course interface changed) I only got " iptables v1.3.5: Unknown arg

http://www.nabble.com/file/p20332968/spe.dat spe.dat Hi, i have a problem in sorting out some command in R and i am really hoping some expert can help me out please! i have the spe.dat file which i upload here, and when u read into R u got something like this: A5 <- read.table('spe.dat' ,header=TRUE) A5 EXPEND ECAB MET GROW YOUNG OLD WEST STATE 1 256 85.5 19.7 6.9 29.6

# Get mean, min, max sigma and skew by group options (digits = 3) library (ISwR data(energy) data %>% group_by(stature) %>% summarize( Mean = mean(expend), Min = min(expend), Max = max(expend), Sigma = sd(expend), Skew = skew(expend)) # Output stature Mean Min Max Sigma Skew <fct> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl> 1

Hello! My system is: Internet ADSL(PPPoE) ---> ppp0 [LINUX server(router)] eth0 ---> LAN Server(router) is running on LINUX Slackware 8.1. I have recompiled a 2.4.22 kernel, enabled all QoS support in the kernel config, including HTB. My ADSL bandwidth is 256Kbit/s for download and 64Kbit/s for upload. I use the following HTB+IPTABLES configuration, because I want to reduce bandwith for

Hello all, I am providing broadband service through DVB circuit. I have 4KB uplink and 32KB downlink. I want to share 32KB downlink bandwidth among 192.168.0.0/24 (20 users in this subnet i.e 192.168.0.2-192.168.0.22)subnet where each user will get 2KB to 6KB bandwidth. And from 4KB uplink bandwidth each users will get only 1KB to 2KB bandwidth.

I''ve network with NATed hosts. I want to catch only all traffic going from my server, but I don''t want catch NATed traffic from LAN. I need only traffic going from/to my server (traffic from INPUT, OUTPUT chain in iptables) (like SSH, postfix, WWW or proxy). This is throw all traffic from my LAN to IFB: $TC qdisc add dev $iface_lan handle ffff: ingress $TC qdisc add dev

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8375 Summary: rsync with bandwidth limit sometimes expend extra time Product: rsync Version: 3.0.8 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: fbmoser at

Hi, i try to plot my graph into different device using x11(), but when i do this comes up: > x11(print(plot(A5e$ECAB,A5e$EXPEND,type='p',main='Per capita expenditure > against economic + ability index without outliners',xlab='ECAB',ylab='EXPEND',xlim=c(0,150),ylim=c(150,400), + col='red',col.axis='blue'))) NULL Warning message:

Hello, I am using the following iptables POSTROUTING rule to NAT some RFC 1918 addresses: iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -s 192.168.19.23 ! 192.168.0.0/255.255.0.0 -p tcp --dport 80 -j SNAT --to-source 10.32.4.2 (I am using SNAT instead of MASQUERADE for performance reasons). I have several addresses on the 192.168.0.0/16 subnet that I am SNAT''ing similarly. Problem is, ''tc

I have a shorewall . My outgoing bandwidth is 10M connected to the Internet. On behind shorewall, there are number of servers which provide different services say http, ftp, smtp. I want to ensure some of service to grantuate that a certain amount of bandwidth to serve Internet people. Let''s say my configuration. 2M for ftp 3M for smtp 5M for http such that to prevent Internet people

Hi, I'm having trouble sweaving the following example: --8<------------------------schnipp------------------------->8--- \documentclass{article} \begin{document} \SweaveOpts{echo=FALSE} @ <<>>= rm(list=c(ls())) library(Hmisc) library(ISwR) data(energy) energy$log <- log(energy$expend) attach(energy) @ %def @ <<results=tex>>= mysum <- summary(stature ~

Hello, I wrote a simple traffic shaping script (below) that should have allowed me to shape my internet traffic a bit (ppp0 - adsl 128kbit/64kbit; local interface eth0). The script works only partially - the speed is being limited but too much. Without running this script my download rate is about 10kBytes (with second computer also downloading at about 6kBytes). After running it my download speed

Hi, I was wondering if there is a ready made function or parameter for indicating the sample size in boxplots? Here's what I came up with so far: library(ISwR) data(energy) attach(energy) boxplot(expend~stature) sample.size <- tapply(expend, stature, length) sample.size <- paste("N=", sample.size, sep="") mtext(sample.size, at=1:length(unique(stature)), line=2,

Hi Chandler, I am now working on a bisecting tool to find mis-optimization on LLVM. I found OptBisect a very useful option and hope to make it work on the new pass manager. I have several questions about it. 1. Any plans to apply codegen stage with new pass manager? IIUC, new pass manager only works for opt stage. However the OptBisect option tries to accumulate pass counts through opt stage

I've been using tc/htb for network control previously to control bandwidth available to different services running on their own IPs on a unvirtualized host. Now, I have put them into their own guest VM. I would like to be able to do something similar to ensure the more crucial service gets more bandwidth as well as ensuring ssh always get reserved bandwidth. However, when I try the good old

Hi ; +--------+ +-----------+ +--------+ | server |---------- | linux box |---------------------| Client | +--------+ +-----------+ +--------+ MY script: tc-htb3 qdisc del dev eth1 root ipchains -F tc-htb3 qdisc add dev eth1 root handle 10: htb default 20 r2q 40 tc-htb3 class add dev eth1 parent 10: classid 10:1 htb

Hi Andreas! I mainly understand what you mean, I tried to fix something on the script, I don''t know if I did it well. Can you take another look on it please and if is wrong to make the corrections directly on it so that I see where the mistake is... With this script I want to make limits for IP class 85.120.48.0/25 for international traffic in 256 KBps classes and for metropolitan

We are using VLAN tagging to put several networks on one machine. To ensure quality of service on one of the VLANs, we would like to prioritize (outgoing/egress traffic) one VLAN interface over the other (or others), but without capping bandwidth on any of the interfaces. We want to do this while being careful to minimize increases in latency on the prioritized interface. Since these are two or

Hello, there''s a problem I''ve had for several months now, and I''ve never been able to find an answer to it. I''ll try to explain as quick as possible: I have a server that controlls my home network, it provides internet to them also (NAT) and I would like to provide QoS by shaping traffic. I have a p2p server here (running mldonkey), since only that

Hi, After spectacularly failing to get HTB to proportionately distribute excess bandwidth into multiple classes based on the rate, I decided to hack my requirements. Now I''m creating multiple classes with the sum of the bandwidths of the classes being equal to (OK, slightly less than) the link bandwidth. Scenario: Linux Router +------+ 256K