similar to: 2 ISP connection sharing problem

Hi all, Can anyone in this mailing list answer a few theoretical question which r confusing me. Here is the scenario I have a total Bandwidth of 2Mbps for a private LAN I am managing. I am using cbq standard script available online and for controlling bandwidth, squid and iptables. I have diff. packages for client. One: server own services access (unlimited bandwidth means no delays or

Hi, Somewhere I read that zfs snapshots are under the development. are there any news? Thanks, Arman. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20170817/df8afb76/attachment.html>

Hello, Thanks for the great Shorewall which has replaced my hard to maintain home-made scripts. First, what works. Our local network is 10.48.X.X with multiple vlan, each on a dedicated interface. We use Shorewall 4.4.11 from Debian Squeeze. We have a 2 ISP: - isp1 : an optical fiber provider with 10 Mbps. - isp2 : a DSL provider with 15Mbits/1Mbits. We use isp2 as the default outgoing

Hello everybody: Here is my "network layout": ISP1 ISP2 | | | | +-----eth0---------eth1------+ | | | FC 3 box | | | +-----eth2---------eth3------+ |

Hi All, With the help of Chuck Tuffli, I'm now able to use CTL to export a zvol over FC to a Linux host: LUN Backend Size (Blocks) BS Serial Number Device ID 0 block 4185915392 512 FBSDZFS001 ORA_ASM_01 lun_type=0 num_threads=14 file=/dev/zvol/tank/oracle_asm_01 1 block 4185915392 512 FBSDZFS002 ORA_ASM_02

Hi, I am migrating from one ISP to another, and would like to run both simultaneously for a while. So: (both netmask 255.255.255.248) [ISP1] 24.106.62.180 [ISP2] 209.181.237.230 | | | | \ / -----[ HUB ]----- | | -------- eth0 --------- | Linux FW/Server | ---------eth1 --------- | | [ HUB ] | 10.0.0.x/255.255.255.0 The default IP on

Hello All, I have two Internet link and two LAN networks I have Redhat-7.1 linux-2.4.17 kernel and 2 NICs In eth0 172.16.1.1 and eth0:1 192.168.1.1 in eth1 are public ips of isps as eth1 a.b.c.d and eth1:0 w.x..y.z I want do source routing using ip rule command. echo 200 isp1 >> /etc/iproute2/rt_tables ip rule add from 172.16.1.0/24 table isp1 ip rule ls 0: from all lookup local

Hi, At office, we have I ISPs. I want to lightly monitor each link latency in order to decide several routing. For that, I have only one external server: 1 IP, it's an OVH dedicated server. The quick picture is http://s24.postimg.org/n3436z64l/defaul_route.png Default route is via ISP1. If OVH-server pings IP1: - the request will go through ISP1: it's OK - the reply will go through

Yes. It is in the review phase . Actually Sriram implemented zfs snapshot and Mark implemented the brtfs and Mark merged these two patches [1]. Adding them in cc . Reviews are most welcome. [1] : https://review.gluster.org/#/c/17865/ Regards Rafi KC On 08/17/2017 05:22 PM, Arman Khalatyan wrote: > Hi, > Somewhere I read that zfs snapshots are under the development. > are there any

Hello,I have single linux router ( fedora core 1 ), 2 ISP, 1 internal network,1 IP space from every ISP My scenario: eth0 1.0.0.2 netmask 255.255.255.252 -> ISP 1 eth1 2.0.0.2 netmask 255.255.255.252 -> ISP 2 eth2 1.0.1.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 -> IP space from ISP1 eth3 2.0.1.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 -> IP space from ISP2 Config I try: /etc/iproute2/rt_tables: 10 isp1 20 isp2 ip

Hi, Is there any tested good HTB script for traffic shaping available like as that of CBQ available at. http://freshmeat.net/projects/cbq.init I am n new bie and need to work on htb. -- Regards, M Arman _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc

Interesting table Karan!, Could you please tell us how you did the benchmark? fio or iozone orsimilar? thanks Arman. On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 1:20 PM, Karan Sandha <ksandha at redhat.com> wrote: > Hi Collin, > > During our arbiter latency testing for completion of ops we found the > below results:- an arbiter node in another data centre and both the data > bricks in the

Hi, I want to configure QoS in my shorewall conf but I have a doubt. Now I am using tcrules with prerouting and with the file providers, like this. 2:P 192.168.0.11 0.0.0.0/0 tcp 25 So, with this way I route my smtp traffic with my provider number 2. Well, now I want to configure QoS with tcclasses and tcdevices, but if I do that I need to use the MARK in the tcclasses So, how

Hi there. Currently, our network design has two ISP lines and 3 subnets for LAN. Below are some details :- eth0 - isp1 eth1 - isp2 eth2 - subnet1 eth3 - subnet2 eth4 - subnet3 What i wanted to do is to assign incoming port 80 to our local squid server running on the firewall itself and assigned it to eth0(ISP1). I think it shouldnt be a problem as /etc/shorewall/rules provides a sample of the

0 *H 010 +0 *H $Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hi ALL, I''m new to TC and IPTABLES and i need help in setting up a filter/routing solution to an ISP. I''ve read all the HOWTOs and i''ve reading LARTC messages for a month now. I still don''t have a clue on how to do it ''cause sometimes people say

Hi, I have a simple question. I have my firewall with 2 external Ip and 1 lan. For example ISP1 FW LAN----Mail Server ISP2 Ok, when i DANT the smpt port to my mail server, I can see that the conection in my mail server comes from the external IP of my ISP. I need to change this so the conection to my mail server cames from the LAN IP from my firewall Is this possible?

hello, i have 2 links to the ISP of 128kbit each, and i want to balance the trafic between them, but not staticly (local ip1-5 throw isp1, and the rest to isp2). I though at a ingress clasification, then routing by the mark, and at the exit nat (yes i must do nat :(((, but the clasification must be flow based, and i dont know how to do it. C _______________________________________________ LARTC

I need to route: from 196.33.50.0/25 (default route) to ISP1 from 196.33.248.0/24 (default route) to ISP2 ISP1 --------- fire --+---- 196.33.248.0/24 / | ISP2 --------/ +---- router ----- router ----- 196.33.50.0/25 What I''ve done: Default route via ISP1 created routing table ISP2 for default route via ISP2 I would like to do the following but they get

I have two interfaces on a centos machine with IPs 192.168.2.15 and 192.168.3.15. The routing table is: # route Kernel IP routing table Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface 192.168.3.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth1 192.168.2.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth0 169.254.0.0 *

Hi all, I have managed to setup a Fedora 7 box with 3 ethernet cards and two ADSL modem/routers from different suppliers as LARTC recommends. I am able to direct traffic for specific internal IPs either to one or the other ADSL line. However, I am faced with two problems I am struggling for the solution: 1. I have opened a few ports on the ADSL router/firewalls to talk to internal hosts; say when