similar to: Marking and remarking of incoming traffic

I''m trying to configure 4 queues with strict priorities based on DSCP. I tried to following commands, but it seems that the filters I defined have no effect tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: prio bands 4 tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 1:0 handle 10: pfifo limit 100 tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 1:1 handle 20: pfifo limit 100 tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 1:2 handle 30: pfifo limit 100 tc

Hi! I am studying HTB. I used the topology showed below: 10.1.0.1 ------ 10.1.14.25 (eth1) / 192.168.10.10 (eth0) ----- 192.168.10.11 (host 1) (router) (host 2) All machines use Debian Etch. Has a Iptables masquerading rule to eth1 in the router machine . The NICs are 100 Mb/s. The host 1 has Apache 2 and a file with 670 MB (CD ISO image) to download. When I used

Hello, I am trying to mess with a prio type qdisc, and must be missing something. Here''s my sample code: tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: prio tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1:0 prio 1 protocol ip u32 \ match ip dst 208.0.0.0/8 flowid 1:1 tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1:0 prio 3 protocol ip u32 \ match ip dst 0.0.0.0/0 flowid 1:3 I would assume that any traffic going to

All: I have been told that HTB_HYSTERESIS might have some effect on rate calculations. This file is usually in /usr/src/linux/net/sched/sch_htb.c. If I change this file I have to re-compile. I am not quite sure how to do this. Can someone list the steps necessary to re-compile or point me to a doc that explains how to do so. Thanks. Jon Flechsenhaar Boeing WNW Team Network Services

Hi there! I''ve using HTB for a while and now I an faced with a ''problem''. How hierarchical is HTB? Let''s say I have this 3 layer HTB setup: root class 1: (rate=100, ceil=100) 1: children classes 1:10 (30,100) and 1:20 (70,100) 1:10 children classes 1:100 (10,100) and 1:101 (20,100) 1:20 children classes 1:200 (30,100) and 1:201 (70,100) I managed to have

Hey everyone, For some reason my htb configuration isn''t allowing any class to burst up to its ceiling ever, even when the link is only being utilised by one class that class only ever gets its assigned rate and exactly that assigned rate... The hierarchy I have is 1: at the root with no default, then 1:2 and 1:3 under that, both with assigned rates, then 2: and 3: under those

Hello, I''m using a script with tc, to limit my outgoing traffic : tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb tc class add dev eth0 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 500kbit burst 6k tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1: protocol ip prio 1 u32 match ip dst 172.28.54.9 flowid 1:1 I want to test bandwidth with iperf to see if limitation is correct. Sometimes, I get correct measure for certain rates,

Dear all, I''m making a script to implement DiffServ policies with HTB. Here it is : if test $1 = "help" -o $1 = "h" -o $# != 5 then echo "usage: ds.sh <DEVICE> <DS_RATE> <EF_RATE> <AF_RATE> <BE_RATE>" exit fi DEV=$1 DS_RATE=$2 EF_RATE=$3 AF_RATE=$4 BE_RATE=$5 sync tc qdisc del root dev $DEV tc qdisc add dev $DEV root handle

Hi, I''m trying to divide my bandwidth between different services, but I''d like to take into account the number of active users. For example, l want divide my bandwidth between HTTP and SMTP and guarantee HTTP 80% of the bandwidth. However, I have many users on my system (tens of thousands) and if only 1% of my active users are using HTTP (and the other 99% SMTP), I''d

Please see below Jon Flechsenhaar Boeing WNW Team Network Services (714)-762-1231 202-E7 -----Original Message----- From: Flechsenhaar, Jon J Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2006 10:30 AM To: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl Subject: FW: [LARTC] 2.6.14 - HTB/SFQ QoS broken? Please see below Jon Flechsenhaar Boeing WNW Team Network Services (714)-762-1231 202-E7 -----Original Message----- From:

I am assuming that the TOS values directly map to DSCP values in the ip header. Is this a correct assumption? If so, can someone tell me the correct setting to set call control packets with a DSCP of AF31(011010) and media with EF(101110)? So would the setting for AF be TOS=46?? Is it possible to mark the media and call control separately?? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML

Hi to all I am studying HTB on LARTC how to. I realize a simple configuration on router: tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb default 30 tc class add dev eth0 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 3mbit burst 15k tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:1 classid 1:10 htb rate 2mbit burst 15k tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:1 classid 1:20 htb rate 1mbit burst 15k tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 1:10 handle 10: sfq

Greetings routing folks, I want to use the netmask 255.255.255.255 to insulate (not quite isolate) machines on a shared subnet from each other. This works just fine on win XP, but Linux iproute will not acccept the gateway address in one step -- neither on the command line nor via DHCP: Here''s the interface, set up with a netmask of /32: # ip addr ... 2: eth0:

Is there anyway to actually see packet stats or that packets are for sure going into a prio queue with TC? I can see all the HTB stats but the prio classes just list as being there...would like more information Basically I have the following setup DSMARK | HTB - (tcindex filter on TOS) | Prio (u32 filter on TOS) Thanks Jon Flechsenhaar Boeing WNW Team Network Services

I want to limit pps (packets per second) not just bandwidth on the ingress side. I can do this using IP tables but I''m curious if there is a way to do this with TC. Thanks. Jon Flechsenhaar Boeing WNW Team Network Services (714)-762-1231 202-E7

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1964 Bug #: 1964 Summary: QoS/DSCP names false translated to ToS hex value Classification: Unclassified Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 5.9p1 Platform: amd64 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ssh

ALL: <<diffserv-gred_10-06>> I have attached the current script that I am using. $TC qdisc add dev $EDEV parent 2:20 gred setup DPs 3 default 2 grio $TC qdisc change dev $EDEV parent 2:20 gred DP 1 limit $lim min $minTh max $maxTh avpkt $avgPL burst $bursty bandwidth $netBand probability 0.02 prio 2 $TC qdisc change dev $EDEV parent 2:20 gred DP 2 limit $lim min $minTh max

Hello mailing list, i stand bevor a mystery and cannot explain it J. I want to do shaping and prioritization and I have done these following configurations and simulations. I can´t explain, that the combination of PRIO and TBF is much better than the HTB (with the prio parameter) alone or in combination with the SFQ. Here are my example configurations: 2 Traffic Classes http (80 = 0x50) and

Please see below Jon Flechsenhaar Boeing WNW Team Network Services (714)-762-1231 202-E7 -----Original Message----- From: Flechsenhaar, Jon J Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2006 9:35 AM To: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl Subject: [LARTC] 2.6.14 - HTB/SFQ QoS broken? Jody: I don''t know if you answer basic HTB questions but I''l try anyway. I''m implementing AF and EF with a

Hi, I am trying to get assured forwarding/expedited forwarding with gred and htb working. Below is the script I am using. The following steps are what I thing is how the script works. My problem is that if I remove the HTB qdisc from the script and have the GREDS parent as the dsmark it works, but when I add the htb as a parent of GRED and DSmark the parent of htb it does not work? Any