similar to: Rails 0.12.1: No major update without a bit of pain

I am struggling with how to do eager loading of an acts_as_tree model. If the model Stuff acts_as_tree I know I can do this to get children as well: Stuff.find(:all, :include => :children) But what if the model I am including is the one that acts_as_tree? For example, say Picture belongs_to Category. Category acts_as_tree and I want to get all pictures that are members of a category that

Hi, I''m starting to build a simple (?!) FAQ system, and I''d like some advice on setting up the model relationships. I was going to go with a simple system of a Category table and a FAQ table (holding questions and answers) - where one FAQ belongs to one category. That''s all nice - a simple has_many / belongs_to relationship. Then I decided to add another level - Area.

Is there a way to eager load children with a model that acts_as_tree? I tried: :include => :children but it gives a mysql error... Thanks, Justin

Still a semi-newbie, but so far I''ve managed to solve most things with a bit of help from the Agile book, some googling around, and a bit of trial-and-error, but I''m really stuck with this one (very much an Ajax newbie): I know how to gracefully degrade an AJAX newpost type call so it can appear inline or (for those without JS support) go to a new page (put an ":href

ok, I''m still new to ruby and new to rails. what I have is a task database that acts_as_tree a task can have a children an those children are full tasks so they can have children of their own, Tasks can only be completed if they have no children, a task with children is only completed if all its children are done. this much I have working, I''m trying to add some Ajax support for

Hello, I am updating an object with an AJAX form: view: <% remote_form_for(@sample, :update => "content2") do %> <p> parameter: <br /> <%= select("sample","parameter",Parameter.find(:all).collect {|p| [p.description.gsub(''_'', '' ''),p.id]},{},{:size => 4, :multiple => true}) %>

Hi There! I''d like some feedback before I try to implement some funky rails routes based on an acts_as_tree model. I have a Page model that acts_as_tree. I''d like the URLs to look something like this: http://localhost/about-us/staff/jeff or, another example... http://localhost/what-we-do/products/our-great-cms/features/faqs/ So, as many sub-nodes the user creates,

Getting a strange error. In a story I have the following step: When "I submit a search name" do xhr :post, ''/searches'', {:search => {:given_name => "bob", :family_name => "smith"}} end I am getting: ArgumentError: wrong number of arguments (4 for 3) stories/searching_story_spec.rb:45 in "I submit a search name" But I only

Has anyone extended Rails''s acts_as_tree to use the Modified Preorder Traversal algorithm? This is a really clever trick for optimizing access to trees stored in databases, as described lucidly in this article: http://www.sitepoint.com/article/hierarchical-data-database/2 It adds two integer fields, a "left counter" and "right counter", to each row. By

hi. base from the cookbook example, where each categories can have many recipes, id like the categories to have multiple sub categories, unlimited levels. please show some code, as i am new to Ruby and Ruby On Rails. thanks -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

So I have a model that acts_as_tree and I run a method on a collection of all of these records. This method walks the tree and fetches the parent/children, etc. This results in many, many duplicate SQL queries to be executed. Is there a way to eagerly load all of these models? Something along the lines of: Model.find(:all, :include => [:children, :parent]) If I execute the above statement, I

I am trying to create a record with association. Within the create method, I would also like to pre-populate dependent (has_many) records from a template in the database. The child records are <u>mysteriously rolled back </u> if I insert them in a loop. If I try to insert a single child record, it works.I have read the books and tried to google my way out of this but am at a dead

For a project that I am working on I need to have a family tree. This means that instead of having one parent each item has at most two. As far as I know acts_as_tree only allows one parent_id. Any suggestions on how to make a "acts_as_family_tree" ? Thanks, Mark -- -------------------------------------------------------------------- I am Mark Daggett and I approve this message.

I want to implement a unique category tree per user in my system, and I was hoping to use "acts_as_tree" on my category model. It seems as if acts_as_tree makes the assumption that the entire table the model is off of is one large tree. I actually want each user to have their own category trees all stored in the category table so I need it to scope off of the user_id.

Hello, I have a tree structure that needs to be converted into a nested set. A great deal of work has already been done on the tree items, so maintaining the integrity of the id''s is mandatory. However I need the ability to access entire branches of the tree, which is what Nested set does. Does anyone have any suggestions on how to efficiently transfer the tree to the nested set and

The following short console session illustrates the problem: Loading development environment (Rails 2.3.2) >> topic=BlogTopic.find(4) => #<BlogTopic id: 4, parent: 2, topic: "Topic Four", created_at: "2009-07-13 21:31:22", updated_at: "2009-09-14 00:37:29"> >> topic.inspect => "#<BlogTopic id: 4, parent: 2, topic: \"Topic

I am creating forum application which needs usage of acts_as_list or acts_as_tree or acts_as_nested_set. I am unable to decide among these. please could some one recommend from their experience? -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

So I have the following model class Topic < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :topic has_many :topics, :order => :position acts_as_tree :order => :position acts_as_list :scope => :topic_id end that I use for a site''s navigation. Everything (list, create, edit, even the drag&drop sort) works fine, except the destroy function, which the vanilla version def destroy

Hi there, the acts_as_tree API says that I can set a counter cache and that it will automatically increment the "children_count" column. I did that but when I create a new page it asks for a "pages_count" column instead. Here is the relevant part of page.rb model: class Page < ActiveRecord::Base acts_as_tree :order => :position, :counter_cache => true

Hi, I''m trying to implement a very simple acts_as_tree search in my index html. I am able to show the parents, with no issue, but the children will not show. I have something like this for the parent, which displays fine: <% for group in Group.roots %> <td> <tr> <a href="#" onclick="Effect.BlindDown(''show_<%=