similar to: Patch accurate packet scheduling for ATM/ADSL

Hi all, I patch my kernel (2.6.17) and my tc (iproute2-2.6.18-061002) utilitie for an accurate packet scheduling on an ATM link. I configure my HTB hierarchy on the upload of the link and try with differents flows. It works correctly but in some of case I lose about 50% of my bandwith. I use the overhead (42) configuration for my link (PPPoE, VC/LLC) indicate in the documentation. My question

The HTB qdisc has a compile time option, HTB_HYSTERESIS, that trades accuracy of traffic classification for CPU time. These patches change hysteresis to be a runtime option under the control of "tc". The effects of HYSTERESIS on HTB''s accuracy are significant (see chapter 7, section 7.3.1, pp 69-70 in Jesper Brouer''s thesis: http://www.adsl-optimizer.dk/thesis/ ),

Hi, I''ve written a small javascript ADSL throughput calculator: http://nukunuku.yamamaya.is-a-geek.org/~ranma/adsl.html Feel free to submit alternative presets (I currently have presets for three german telecom speed variants: T-DSL (1000|2000|3000), derived from http://www2.lancom.de/kb.nsf/5d445c701b3ff52dc1256e7700297e5c/27c6ee1c3e3f74b0c1256e94004a433e?OpenDocument). Comments,

LARTC，hello！ As title, and I want to know its member's purpose: struct tc_ratespec { unsigned char cell_log; unsigned char __reserved; unsigned short feature; short addend; unsigned short mpu; __u32 rate; }; who can help me? Thanks! 　　　best regards! 　　　　　　　　　　　　　　Huang Xin Gang 　　　　　　　　　　　　　　hxgang@csnet4.cs.tsinghua.edu.cn 　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　2002-05-16

Hi, I find this diagram which details the kernel packet traveling : http://www.docum.org/docum.org/kptd/ Is it up to date ? I made some test and I put a DNAT rules in the PREROUTING table of an interface and I attach it a ingress policy, the dst IP wasn''t changed. the DNAT it isn''t yet make. I''ve another question (I''m not sure is it the good mailing list), for

Hi everyone. I''m new to this list and I have some questions regarding HTB class. I was trying to see how tc sets the parameters for HTB, but really couldnt understand them. So, I thought that I might ask the wizards. It''s mainly from the source code. 1. What is the cell_log ? (its everywhere in the code) 2. Why does htb calculate its burst(buffer) with tc_xmit_time() ? Is

OK, here it is. Near perfect bandwidth calculation for ADSL users. Patch iproute2 with the HTB stuff and then this: It''s still a hack (as far as I can tell) because we are patching the rates tables, and hence I think it is only loosly coupled with the actual calculation of bytes in each bucket. However, it works very nicely for me! I have only been lightly testing with

I have been trying to optimise my ADSL connections for VOIP. Funny things were happening - for example increasing the ping packet size by 50% had no effect, but then adding one byte had a major effect. It took me a while to figure out that I was seeing the effects of the fixed ATM cell size. This is probably obvious to some of you. For the rest: ADSL uses ATM as its transport. An ATM

The HTB qdisc has a compile time option, HTB_HYSTERESIS, that trades accuracy of traffic classification for CPU time. These patches change hysteresis to be a runtime option under the control of "tc". The effects of HYSTERESIS on HTB''s accuracy are significant (see chapter 7, section 7.3.1, pp 69-70 in Jesper Brouer''s thesis: http://www.adsl-optimizer.dk/thesis/ ),

This patch updates the network emulation packet scheduler. * name changed from delay to netem since it does more than just delay * Catalin''s merged code to do packet reordering * uses a socket queue''s directly rather than layering on qdisc(fifo) because this is used in performance tests. * adds placeholder in API for future enhancements (rate and duplicate).

Hi all, I patch my kernel (2.6.17) and my tc (iproute2-2.6.18-061002) utilitie for an accurate packet scheduling on an ATM link. I configure my HTB hierarchy on the upload of the link and try with differents flows. It works correctly but in some of case I lose about 50% of my bandwith. I use the overhead (42) configuration for my link (PPPoE, VC/LLC) indicate in the documentation. My question is,

Okay, here is a very simple QOS scheduler that delays packets for 2.6. It is good for testing, and might be useful for people who want to put some class of traffic into a "penalty box". Alexey''s tc command is really easy to extend to new disciplines. There is a version which knows about this scheduler at: http://developer.osdl.org/shemminger/tcp/iproute2-delay.tar.bz2 The

ingress can be used to control the incoming packet, such as: tc qdisc add dev eth0 handle ffff: ingress tc filter add dev eth0 parent ffff: protocol ip prio 5 u32 match ip src 172.16.1.11 police rate 10kbit burst 10k drop flowid :1 tc filter add dev eth0 parent ffff: protocol ip prio 5 u32 match ip src 172.16.1.22 police rate 10kbit burst 10k drop flowid :2 first ,I do not sure these method can

Hi, New to traffic shaping I would like to make some tests. It''s for a production server (fw), using 2.4.27 kernel. Something is not clear to me about HTB... is the last stable version included in the 2.4.27 kernel and iproute2 (iproute2-2.6.8-040823.tar.bz2) ? Are there special patches to apply ? EC. _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list /

On Thu, 2007-06-28 at 12:28 +0200, Marek Michalkiewicz wrote: > Do you have an updated version of your patches for the latest > kernel (soon to be 2.6.22), iptables and iproute? Or can the > current patches be safely applied (with some merging by hand, > but no significant changes) to the latest sources? No, not yet. But I am in the process or moving my production systems from

Hi, Someone know how to use the dqisc atm (sch_atm) ? I can''t find some doc about it. Thanks, Edouard. _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc

I Patch the kernel and tc with ''Patches to Linux''s traffic control engineto allow it to accurately calculate ATM traffic rates'' I use a router with eth0 e adsl interface, i launch this script to have shaping on eth0 egress interface: tc qdisc add dev eth0 root tbf rate 10000000 burst 100k latency 20ms mtu 1500 mpu 64 i The traffic enters on adsl and go out on eth0 ,

Hi there.I''m Brenda from the Australia,I wanna work on a project relating to VOIP QoS.I wanna evaluate IP over ATM against IP over Ethernet on the following parameters relating to voice and video traffic; bandwidth consumption packet loss packet delay(latency) jitter traffic thoroughput Is this project feasible?Can I use NS to simulate the models?I hope you reply.Thanks. Best regards.

Anyone know if it''s possible to interleave two IP packets when using PPPoA and VC based lines? Can it be done with any PPPoE implementations? The goal is to reduce the delay when you have a high priority packet waiting, but a lower priority (large) packet already started going out ahead of this packet. I don''t want the overhead of much smaller MTU, which is the other way

Is it possible to dynamically do bandwidh reservation? That is, I want to limit the traffic to 50% for upload and download, but if there aren''t onbound traffic, who is doing a download will get 100% of bandwidh and if there aren''t inbound traffic, who is doing a upload will get 100%, but if there are both inbound and outbount traffic, each one get limited to 50%. I think this