similar to: about default filter command

Le 26 juil. 07 à 13:55, Georgi Alexandrov a écrit : > Vincent Dautremont wrote: > >> Hi, >> here I have another newcomer question :-) >> in the section 9.6.1 of this how too >> http://tldp.org/HOWTO/Adv-Routing-HOWTO/lartc.qdisc.filters.html >> we can read commands about filters : >> ------------------------------------------ >> >> # tc

Guys After reading through the archives I found some insightful ways to be able to shape traffic to pppoe clients from the server. I have two questions on the topic of setting up a pppoe server however... 1. The clients will all be connected to each other using a normal ethernet network, the segments connected with managed switches. The capacity is roughly 500 nodes. Will these pppoe sessions

Hello, let's assume we have: [$someshare] path = /some/path create mask = 0644 directory mask = 0755 Within /some/path there's directory named dir1 for example (/some/path/dir1). Is it possible to define alternative masks for that particular directory without presenting it as a different share. My second question - is it possible to define write list for /some/path/dir1 only. --

ehlo list, I''m willing to shape ppp users e.g. each pppX interface to get XXX kbits I classify traffic going to ppp+ interfaces like this: iptables -t mangle -A POSTROUTING -o ppp+ -j CLASSIFY --set-class 0002:0020 then i have a file which is executed when a ppp inteface is up and first argument parsed to that file ($1) is the ppp number (e.g. 35 for ppp35). it generally looks like

root@Delta:~# tc filter add dev ppp0 parent 1:1 flowid 1:5 protocol ip Unknown filter "flowid", hence option "1:5" is unparsable root@Delta:~# tc filter add dev ppp0 parent 1:1 classid 1:5 protocol ip Unknown filter "classid", hence option "1:5" is unparsable I don''t understand why it does not work. Can anybody explain me this problem? --

For simplicity, I tried this: tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: prio tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 1:1 handle 10: sfq perturb 10 tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 1:2 handle 20: sfq perturb 10 tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 1:3 handle 30: sfq perturb 10 tc filter add dev eth0 protocol ip parent 1: prio 2 flowid 1:1 The last line prints: Unknown filter "flowid", hence option "1:1"

oops, i forgot to reply to the list :-/ Début du message réexpédié : > De : Vincent Dautremont <vdautrem@ulb.ac.be> > Date : 30 août 2007 16:58:26 GMT+02:00 > À : Ali Jawad <alijawad1@gmail.com> > Objet : Rép : [LARTC] Priotirize SSH Traffic > > try that > #tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle1: prio > # tc filter add dev eth0 protocol ip parent 1: prio 1 u32

I downloaded iproute2-2.4.7-now-ss010824.tar.gz and I did patched tc with the htb3.6_tc.diff from htb3.6-020525.tgz and when I try to use a htb script I get just errors. I did not patch the kernel, since I use kernel 2.4.21 and I saw on - HTB Homepage that I need to patch it only if I run version 2.4.20 or earlier. Do also need the kernel patch ? Or maybe is something else wrong? RTNETLINK

Hello.. I have a linux box and I want to make priority on traffic generated by my LAN''s computers.. I don''t have a guaranted bandwidth, so I wanna use sfq... I want to make traffic to port 80 , 443 , 25 & 110 PRIORITY 1 Traffic src or dest 192.168.0.2 to make priority 2 And the rest to put it in proiority 3.. I did the following : tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1:

Hey, I have a problem adding a filter matching anything, here is my setup: ############### tc qdisc add dev eth0 handle 1: root prio tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 1:1 handle 10: pfifo tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 1:2 handle 20: tbf latency 50ms rate \ 128kbit burst 256kbit tc filter add dev eth0 protocol ip parent 1:0 prio 1 handle 666 fw \ flowid 1:2 tc filter add dev eth0 protocol ip parent

Hi, I have a server and ten clients in a Gigabit network. The server has 125mbps network bandwidth. I want that the server has 40Mbps bandwidth reserved for client 1 (IP 192.168.5.141), and the rest bandwidth is for all other clients. My script looks like this (I use IFB for incoming traffic): #!/bin/bash export TC="/sbin/tc" $TC qdisc add dev ifb0 root handle 1: htb default 30

People, I''m trying to set up the tc filters for a PRIO queue. I''m basing it off of marked traffic via iptables. For example, I''ve marked two classes of traffic with ids "2" and "4", and now I''m filtering those to bands 1 and 2. tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1: prio 0 protocol ip \ handle 2 fw flowid 10:1 tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1:

tc qdisc del dev eth1 root tc qdisc add dev eth1 root handle 10: prio bands 6 tc qdisc add dev eth1 parent 10:1 handle 20: bfifo tc qdisc add dev eth1 parent 10:2 handle 30: bfifo tc qdisc add dev eth1 parent 10:3 handle 40: bfifo tc qdisc add dev eth1 parent 10:4 handle 50: bfifo tc qdisc add dev eth1 parent 10:5 handle 60: bfifo tc qdisc add dev eth1 parent 10:6 handle 70: bfifo # www traffic

Hello! I was always using "default" in HTB to choose default class, but now I need to do it with filters. Tried following command: # tc filter add dev eth0 protocol ip parent 10: prio 2 flowid 10:2 Unknown filter "flowid", hence option "10:2" is unparsable It is from example in LARTC Howto. My question is then - how to make a filter matching all without eating

Hi I have defined a single HTB qdisc on eth0 with one root class 1:1 further subdivided as below, nothing complicated. 1: (root qdisc) | | 1:1 (root class) /\ / \ / \ / \ / \ 1:10 \

Hi, i''m just new here, i''m searching for how to compile tc (if i''ve understood correctly, i must compile the whole iproute2 thing). So i did like the read me file said: ------ 1. Look at start of Makefile and set correct values for: KERNEL_INCLUDE ----- i did that, and then i doesn''t understand a damn thing about the reste of the the 1st step about ADDLIB

Hey A wise man said to me that Hashing filters was my solution to rock the world, and making my life alot easier. When applying 4000 rules, the system had to check them all for match. But with hassing it would only require 1-2 checks. Even though when i had read the lartc on the subject i was no less that a question mark. If anyone have played with it, and have a working, logic configuration

Hi All, I''ve been playing with QOS for a short while now and have worked out how to do what I want using HTB. Great queuing discipline btw. My problem is the tc filters I want to setup aren''t working because iptables is getting to the packets first and mangling the src address. The iptables script I am using is MonMotha''s Firewall 2.3.8 and it includes lots of nice

hello, a friend of mine have this configuration: 10 x PC -- router/linux/rh8 -- ADSL Modem -- ISP let''s say that the bandwidth is: 5M and 800K he does dc++ and counter-strike, so let''s say the UP is full, and the ping from the counter server is 300ms, the server cut the connection, and no more game, the player is unhappy. The normal ping is 50ms. so he thinks to put some

Hi! I have a setup where I want to prefer traffic on one port (for testing purposes I used port 22) my setup is : tc qdisc add dev eth3 root handle 1: htb default 30 tc class add dev eth3 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 96mbit burst 15k tc class add dev eth3 parent 1: classid 1:7 htb rate 2mbit burst 15k tc class add dev eth3 parent 1:1 classid 1:10 htb rate 96mbit burst 15k tc class add dev