similar to: Re: tc-atm for current 2.6.x kernels?

G''Day I would like to be able to use my VOIP telephone over a saturated ADSL link whilst enjoying optimum audio quality and utilising all of the bandwidth I pay for. It is about this situation that I write. HFSC appears to be the queueing discipline of choice for VOIP. In order for this to work, though, do I have to account for the ATM overhead in the small VOIP packets by defining my

I have a lot question about tc-command because now i''m doing research to compare performance between HTB and HFSC so i''m doubt a lot thing and your reply are so very helpful me ... my question is 1. I''m use opensource (Mastershaper) for help to config traffic control but when i''m try to config HTB, I''m doubt about in each chain must identify

I have a lot question about tc-command because now i''m doing research to compare performance between HTB and HFSC so i''m doubt a lot thing and your reply are so very helpful me ... my question is 1. I''m use opensource (Mastershaper) for help to config traffic control but when i''m try to config HTB, I''m doubt about in each chain must identify fallback

I stumbled upon a problem while upgrading Ubuntu 13.04, Shorewall version from 4.4.26.1 to 4.5.16.1. Everything was working fine before, after upgrading the script wouldn''t start. First some config files. tcdevices: #INTERFACE IN-BANDWIDTH OUT-BANDWIDTH OPTIONS REDIRECTED eth1 - 6300kbit hfsc,classify ifb0 - 6300kbit hfsc

Hello I''ve been messing with traffic controlling for some time and encountered singularities I''d like to talk about. First explaining of my pow (can''t tell how much each point is relevant) Box with Debian, Intel PII*2 old and fancy:), ADSL link with dyn IP, some servers (f. ex. squid), loc net with dhcp, (although IP statically given by MAC); MASQ. Such circumstances

When I start my script: * - Creating classes on br1 for upload control ... * - tc class add dev br1 parent 2:0 classid 2:46 hfsc ls m1 576.0Kbit d 2000ms m2 192.0Kbit ul m2 384Kbit ... [ ok ] * - tc class add dev br1 parent 2:46 classid 2:47 hfsc sc umax 1500b dmax 30ms rate 80Kbit . [ ok ] * - tc class add dev br1 parent 2:46 classid 2:48 hfsc ls m2 152.0Kbit ul m2 152.0Kbit

I have a lot question about tc-command because now i''m doing research to compare performance between HTB and  HFSC so i''m doubt a lot thing and your reply are so very helpful to me ... My question is In HTB tc command question 1. I''m use opensource (Mastershaper) for help to config traffic control but when i''m try to config HTB, I''m doubt about

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Greetings all, Working in concert with the original authors, Klaus Rechert and Patrick McHardy, I have translated their article "HFSC Scheduling mit Linux" [0] on Hierarchical Fair Service Curve (HFSC) into English [1]. http://linux-ip.net/tc/hfsc.en/ Although the original content is not available directly from their website,

Hi, I use the patch (http://ace-host.stuart.id.au/russell/files/tc/tc-atm/) for accurate the packet scheduling on ATM/ADSL link and i think I''ve found a bug. I tried to write to the author but he didn''t answer me. I work on a Linux 2.6.17 with the iproute2-2.6.18-061002 package. I change the type of the cell_align char to short of the struct tc_ratespec in the file pkt_sched.h

This patch fixes the following compile error with CONFIG_BRIDGE=y and CONFIG_ATM_LANE=m: <-- snip --> ... LD .tmp_vmlinux1 net/built-in.o(.init.text+0x3ad1): In function `br_init': : undefined reference to `br_fdb_get_hook' net/built-in.o(.init.text+0x3adb): In function `br_init': : undefined reference to `br_fdb_put_hook' net/built-in.o(.exit.text+0xa2): In

Hi, I am a new user of R and am still trying to figure out which statements do which functions and am looking for a jump start. I have a dataset where the data were collected as ten minute counts where the number of new individuals within a species was recorded as cohorts within 3 separate time intervals within the ten minute count persiod. Each row of data therefore follows a format like

Hi, I''m trying to get a handle on hfsc. Here is my configuration: root@jmnrouter:/jmn# tc class show dev vlan1 class hfsc 1: root class hfsc 1:1 parent 1: ls m1 0bit d 0us m2 225000bit ul m1 0bit d 0us m2 225000bit class hfsc 1:10 parent 1:1 rt m1 191000bit d 25.0ms m2 135000bit ls m1 0bit d 0us m2 135000bit ul m1 0bit d 0us m2 225000bit class hfsc 1:20 parent 1:1 rt m1 22008bit d

Hello list, I am now using hfsc for QOS. I have something like this: tc qdisc add dev ethx root handle 1: hfsc default 9 tc class add dev ethx parent 1: classid 1:1 hfsc ls m2 70mbit ul m2 70mbit tc class add dev ethx parent 1:1 classid 1:9 hfsc ls m2 7mbit #DNS stuff follows tc class add dev ethx parent 1:1 classid 1:2 hfsc rt m1 12mbit d 1ms m2 1mbit #Half-life tc class add dev ethx parent

Hello, First I want to point out that I''m not so familiar with HFSC, since there not so much info online. But here is my script: ${TC} class add dev ${LAN_IFACE} parent 1:0 classid 1:1 hfsc ls rate 100mbit ul rate 100mbit ${TC} class add dev ${LAN_IFACE} parent 1:1 classid 1:2 hfsc ls rate 90mbit ul rate 90mbit ${TC} class add

Hello, I''m having such problem with HFSC with following config: + tc qdisc del dev eth3 root + tc qdisc add dev eth3 root handle 1: hfsc default 2 + tc class add dev eth3 parent 1: classid 1:1 hfsc ls rate 512kbit ul rate 512kbit + tc class add dev eth3 parent 1:1 classid 1:2 hfsc ls rate 2kbit ul rate 400kbit + tc class add dev eth3 parent 1:1 classid 1:3 hfsc ls rate 32kbit ul rate

Can GLMM take formula derived from another object? foo <- glm (OVEN ~ h + h2, poisson, dataset) # ok bar <- GLMM (OVEN ~ h + h2, poisson, dataset, random = list (yr = ~1)) #error bar <- GLMM (foo$formula, poisson, dataset, random = list (yr = ~1)) #Error in foo$("formula" + yr + 1) : invalid subscript type I am using R2.1.0, lme4 0.8-2, windows xp. Below is a dataset if you

hi, I would like to use the HFSC scheduler for my QoS. I''ve 4 class and 2 of them need to control the bandwidth and the latencies so I think I must use HFSC. So I read some doc ( http://del.icio.us/tag/hfsc ) but its not very clear. I make some tests with differents parameters but I''m not able to use correctly this scheduler: $TC qdisc add dev $dev root handle 1: hfsc default 40

(Im' answering cc the list, so the knowledge keeps there, and maybe some more qualified answers become). Am Mittwoch, den 15.10.2008, 18:00 -0700 schrieb Francisco del rosario: > Hey Rodolfo... Need some help from you ... > I need to know what hardware do I need to make SIP calls if I set-up > asterisk > So the situation is that I have a PC and configure the software of my PC to

Hello I have few questions regarding tc functionality (qdiscs, classes, etc.) when vlans are in use. For example, consider interface eth0, for which I create and extra vlan with vconfig, let''s say eth0.11. Then using tc I can add usual things - qdiscs, filters, ... - to both eth0 and eth0.11. The questions are: - on which interface - virtual or real, should I actually use tc ? Or

My hfsc rule .. tc qdisc add dev eth2 handle 1: root hfsc iptables -t mangle -N ms-all iptables -t mangle -N ms-all-chains iptables -t mangle -N ms-prerouting iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -j ms-prerouting iptables -t mangle -A ms-prerouting -j CONNMARK --restore-mark iptables -t mangle -A ms-prerouting -p udp --dport 4444 -j MARK --set-mark 1 iptables -t mangle -A ms-prerouting -p udp -m