similar to: Route optimization.

My Linux workstation (Mandrake 10.1 kernel 2.6.8.1) is dual-homed to two ADSL Internet providers. Card eth0 (192.168.9.250) is the default route and leads to an SMC router (192.168.9.254). Card eth1 (192.168.1.250) leads to a Linksys router (192.168.1.1). I''m not doing any NAT or PPPoE in the workstation - the SMC and Linksys handle it all. If I remove all general default routes from

Hi, I'm trying to download new Ogg Vorbis rpms, and I get a "no route to host" error for fatpipe.vorbis.com for the past several hours. traceroute tells me: $ /usr/sbin/traceroute fatpipe.vorbis.com traceroute to motherfish-II.xiph.org (198.136.36.245), 30 hops max, 38 byte packets 1 GE-0-0-25.core0.interware.hu (195.70.32.193) 0.357 ms 0.541 ms 0.525 ms 2

John Rosatti, Excavators, 3D, NASA and Why Should I care? Well, because! There are two definitions for excavator; one is any person engaging in excavation is called an excavator. The second definition of excavator is, of course, the vehicles called excavators, which are sometimes called diggers, trackhoes, fronthoes, and 360-degree excavators or just 360. This is not to be confused with

Hello, i have a little question. My system: ip route: 0.0.0.0/1 via 10.8.0.5 dev tun0 default via 192.168.2.1 dev br0 proto static metric 425 10.8.0.1 via 10.8.0.5 dev tun0 10.8.0.5 dev tun0 proto kernel scope link src 10.8.0.6 88.198.140.127 via 192.168.2.1 dev br0 192.168.2.0/24 dev br0 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.2.101 metric 425 192.168.122.0/24 dev virbr0 proto kernel

Hello, there is one route missing: 128.0.0.0/1. config client: route-nopull redirect-gateway def1 bypass-dhcp best regards Helmut Viele Gr??e Helmut Drodofsky Internet XS Service GmbH He?br?hlstra?e 15 70565 Stuttgart Gesch?ftsf?hrung Dr.-Ing. Roswitha Hahn-Drodofsky HRB 21091 Stuttgart USt.ID: DE190582774 Tel. 0711 781941 0 Fax: 0711 781941 79 Mail: info at internet-xs.de

Hello everyone. First of all, i congratulate tinc and its community for such reliable tool it is. I am working on a community wireless project where we have an isolated mesh network that we want to link by VPN. In order to fulfill this requirement we setup a tinc VPN, with two "nodes", servera and serverb. Servera has ip 10.0.0.1/24 and serverb has 10.0.0.2/24, and a spare network

Helmut Drodofsky wrote: > Hello, > > there is one route missing: > > 128.0.0.0/1. > Did you mean 127.0.0.0? mark > config client: > route-nopull > redirect-gateway def1 bypass-dhcp > > best regards > Helmut > > Viele Gr??e > Helmut Drodofsky > > Internet XS Service GmbH > He?br?hlstra?e 15 > 70565 Stuttgart > > Gesch?ftsf?hrung

Hello, I''m having a very strange problem concerning traceroute and routing and didn''t know if lartc or netfilter would be the correct choice for asking. (so sorry if my question is misplaced) I have the following setup: public ip -- gw1 -- 172.16.0.1 --- 172.16.0.2/and public ip''s --- gw2 --- switch --users (public and private ip addresses; ip-user-pub) from the

Seems like the message got filtered on BUGTRAQ, I'd still think at least some of the people on this list may have an interest in parts of the data below. Cheers. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2000 06:11:54 +0300 (EET DST) From: Ville <viha@cryptlink.net> To: bugtraq@securityfocus.com Subject: Linux traceroute (oddness & localhost memory-alloc) Hi.

Hi, I am setting up a firewall on CENTOS 4.4. I have done default block iptables -P INPUT DROP iptables -P FORWARD DROP iptables -P OUTPUT DROP I have enabled ICMP to www.google.com iptables -A OUTPUT -p icmp -d 64.233.189.104 -j ACCEPT iptables -A INPUT -p icmp -s 64.233.189.104 -j ACCEPT Ping works fine as below [root at firebox rc.d]# ping 64.233.189.104 PING 64.233.189.104 (

Would it be possible to add a debug option that displays each host name as it connects to them? I create tunnels that sometimes uses 3 intermediate machines before getting to the final destinations (I'm sure others create tunnels that are much deeper). To debug a problem, it would be helpful to see each connection being made. ssh -v[v[v]] doesn't display the hostnames (or

Hi all, ive been using the nano howto to load balance to adsl links for a good while now ive got our live server running kernel 2.6.11.6 and these links work fine. i set up another server same model of machine and used the same kernel config ( wanted to try some tos stuff out) 2.6.11.6 but this one doesnt balance properly. what ever i put in table 222 (which is looked at from all sources) it

Hello List, I have this setup: hosta  <--> hostb  <-->  hostc Hosta and hostc are not directly connected via tinc. But both are conncted via hostb (I called my network tincnet). This works fine I can ssh from hosta to hostc and vice versa without any problems. hostc is in a whitelisted iprange at some service provider. I need hosta to talk to a certain ip (lets call it

Hi all I want to reuse command in the shell historys Which command I can only select "traceroute 192.168.0.5" to run? $ history |grep traceroute 26 traceroute 192.168.0.5 27 traceroute -n 192.168.0.5 28 traceroute 192.168.0.10 29 traceroute yahoo.com 46 traceroute 192.168.0.33 eg: history |grep traceroute | awk '{ print$2 " " print$3}' | grep

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi all, I've got this strange thing: I setup a openvpn link between two openwrts. NetA: 192.168.2.0/24 NetB: 192.168.0.0/24 In netA there is a mail server + DNS: 192.168.2.44, with domain name branch.abc.com In netB there is a mail server + DNS: 192.168.0.44, with domain name abc.com I setup both DNS server to be a slave server of each other

My Linux workstation (Mandrake 10.1 kernel 2.6.8.1) is dual-homed to two ADSL Internet providers. Card eth0 (192.168.9.250) is the default route and leads to an SMC router (192.168.9.254). Card eth1 (192.168.1.250) leads to a Linksys router (192.168.1.1). I''m not doing any NAT or PPPoE in the workstation - the SMC and Linksys handle it all. I know four commands that let you set an IP

Neil, Doesn't look like my original message made it to the mailing list so here you are. ---------- Forwarded Message ---------- Subject: Re: Fwd: [CentOS] HOW to enable traceroute with IPTABLES Date: Sat February 17 2007 10:07 From: Robert Spangler <lazydog at zoominternet.net> To: CentOS mailing list <centos at centos.org> On Sat February 17 2007 03:11, Indunil Jayasooriya

hi, suppose i have firewall with an ethernet interface eth1 for the internal local zone, but in the local zone i have a router which connected to some external offices internal lan. the external office has no other net access just through this line. in orther to be able to define rules and filter the traffic, the router internal interface should have to be in different network then the local

Hi, Below is my Linux firewall network configuration: - eth0 - isp 1, IP: 1.1.1.10, Netmask: 255.255.255.252 eth1 - isp 2, IP: 2.2.2.10, Netmask: 255.255.255.252 eth2 - lan, IP: 172.16.0.254, Netmask: 255.255.255.0 eth3 - dmz, 192.168.0.254, Netmask: 255.255.255.0 isp 1 gateway: 1.1.1.9 isp 2 gateway: 2.2.2.9 Below is my iptables rules: - echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward iptables

I discovered that IPv6 is sort of working when I got an email rejection from Comcast for not having an IPv6 PTR record. I discovered I could telnet to port 25 on their MX server over IPv6! I then found I could tracroute6 to them, but I couldn't to my Linode VPS in Fremont. It gets to the data center and stops. Going the other way, my Linode can traceroute6 almost to my AT&T-hosted