similar to: Project proposal/idea: Categorize traffic by behavior

I am sure this is a very basic question: I have 600,000 categorical variables in a data.frame - each of which is classified as "0", "1", or "2" What I would like to do is collapse "1" and "2" and leave "0" by itself, such that after re-categorizing "0" = "0"; "1" = "1" and "2" =

Any suggestions? It's not a problem for me, I'm mostly curious as it makes it harder to read the IR. Feel free to point me to other documentation if I'm missing something. Thanks, Robin On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 08:10 -0700, I wrote: > The language reference says: "identified [structure] types are never > uniqued". But llvm-link seems to do just that at link-time: >

OK, so in the old implementation you linked a module against the archive before passing it to MCJIT? I'm not familiar with the llvm::Linker interface, so I hope someone else will jump in an address that. I can think of a way to solve this inside MCJIT, but it is almost certainly not what you'd want. -Andy -----Original Message----- From: Robin Sommer [mailto:robin at icir.org] Sent:

I don't believe the changes have made it in yet. In addition to the previous patch set, we've got an independent implementation we've been using for a while: https://github.com/AzulSystems/llvm-late-safepoint-placement We really should get one or the other merged in tree. Could you point me to the previous patch set so I can ping it and review? Philip -------- Original Message

The language reference says: "identified [structure] types are never uniqued". But llvm-link seems to do just that at link-time: > cat x.ll %A = type {} %B = type {} %C = type { %A*, %B* } define void @foo(%C* %c) { ret void } > llvm-link x.ll | llvm-dis ; ModuleID = '<stdin>' source_filename = "llvm-link"

On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 17:14 +0000, you wrote: > What API did you use in 3.2? llvm::Linker used to have a method LinkInLibrary(). My understanding is that there's a larger reorganisation of the linking process going on but I haven't found a straight-forward replacement for that method yet. I might be missing something though. Or perhaps I could even just reuse some code from that old

Hi all, is there a way to link a native static library (.a) into code that runs through MCJIT? I was able to do it with LLVM 3.2, but it seems the API has changed and maybe was removed? Thanks, Robin -- Robin Sommer * Phone +1 (510) 722-6541 * robin at icir.org ICSI/LBNL * Fax +1 (510) 666-2956 * www.icir.org/robin

On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 19:23 +0000, you wrote: > OK, so in the old implementation you linked a module against the > archive before passing it to MCJIT? Yes, I used a Linker instance to link together a number of my own modules and a static library, and then get a single new LLVM module out of that to hand over to MCJIT. > I can think of a way to solve this inside MCJIT, but it is

Hi all, the LLVM documentation lists the 'appending' linkage for having the linker combine two arrays. I'm wondering though if it's then possible to get the size of the combined array, e.g., for iterating over its elements? Or how would I otherwise use the combined array? Thanks, Robin -- Robin Sommer * Phone +1 (510) 666-2886 * robin at icir.org ICSI/LBNL * Fax +1

What API did you use in 3.2? I've never tried this, but I think it's probably possible. -Andy -----Original Message----- From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On Behalf Of Robin Sommer Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 9:37 PM To: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu Subject: [LLVMdev] Linking static archives with MCJIT? Hi all, is there a way to link a native

Hi, I''m having problems with this configuration: iptables 1.3.7 (vanilla or repackaged for fc5) kernel 2.6.19 (vanilla) ROUTE 1.11 (last pom-ng) layer7-filter 2.6 (last in sf.net) connlimit (last pom-ng) When I try to use -j ROUTE in any chain in mangle table I have this error: [root@myhost ~]# iptables -v -t mangle -A POSTROUTING -p tcp --dport msnp -j ROUTE --gw

Hello all, I've run into a problem with returning a struct on Linux x86. Consider the following two pieces of code: # cat a.ll declare { i32, i32 } @foo(i32, i32, i32) define void @do_foo() { call { i32, i32 } @foo(i32 1, i32 2, i32 3) ret void } # cat b.c #include <stdio.h> #include <stdint.h> extern void

On Sat, Dec 05, 2009 at 22:56 -0800, I wrote: > the LLVM documentation lists the 'appending' linkage for having the > linker combine two arrays. I'm wondering though if it's then > possible to get the size of the combined array, e.g., for iterating > over its elements? Or how would I otherwise use the combined array? Any thoughts on this? Am I missing something?

It seems that llvm-ld is stripping debugging symbols even with optimizations disabled: > cat main.c int main() { int a = 42; return a; } > clang -c -g -emit-llvm -o main.bc main.c > llvm-ld -disable-opt -b=a.out.bc main.bc > clang -g a.out.bc -o a.out >gdb a.out [...] (gdb) break main Breakpoint 1 at 0x40045b:

With 3.9, llvm-link tells me 'invalid subroutine type ref' when linking the two code pieces below, and I don't quite understand why. It looks like it merges the debug information with the custom metadata. I've filed a ticket already [1] but as I'm not sure if this is indeed a bug or if I'm misunderstanding something, I thought I'd ask here. Any ideas? Thanks, Robin

> On 2016-Jul-26, at 02:22, Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com> wrote: > > +CC Duncan``` > >> On Jul 25, 2016, at 8:53 PM, Robin Sommer via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >> >> With 3.9, llvm-link tells me 'invalid subroutine type ref' when >> linking the two code pieces below, and I don't quite understand

Hello World ! I want to restrict Logon Hours form some users How can I do that ? Thanks for your respons Olivier

I have a learning disability. In fact, I am a learning-disabled genius. So I pretty much keep to myself. I have a few friends. It's nice to meet you all. I don't call it Replikon.Net on a whim. Lately, I am building a robust cluster. You see, I am pretty much useless without my Slate. So I have, let's see, six (6) of them right now. They are Samsung XE700T1A Business Slates. 3 with

On 04/15/2017 04:46 AM, Pete Biggs wrote: > Not wishing to extend this thread further, but ... > >> There are conspiracy theories out there that the NSA is involved with >> bringing systemd to Linux so they can have easy access to *"unknown"* >> bugs - aka backdoors - to all Linux installations using systemd *[1]*. > They're conspiracy theories, and

I'm charged to investigate the usage of samba as a file server in a Windows network with WinXP machines and Active Directory as authentication system. I experience some problems to let it work correctly. I can't add some share on the linux debian (2.6.7 with ACL backdoors) machine with the MMC plug-in. When I try I get access is denied. The security tab on the winXP machine doesn't