similar to: The issue with IIS Server

Hey, I have such a script: tc qdisc add dev $DEV root handle 1:0 htb default 21 r2q 2 tc class add dev $DEV parent 1:0 classid 1:11 htb rate 100mbit tc class add dev $DEV parent 1:11 classid 1:21 htb rate 512kbit ceil 512kbit tc class add dev $DEV parent 1:11 classid 1:23 htb rate 1024kbit ceil 1024kbit tc class add dev $DEV parent 1:11 classid 1:25 htb rate 3072kbit

Hi, complete newb and I apologise for it. I have a setup where my linux box has multiple broadband connection where I am routing certain things over certain interfaces, currently 2 links eth2 is a 1500/256 and eth3 is a 512/512, eth0 is the link to the LAN for users. What I am trying to do is traffic shape the information going out eth0 to the local users by the interface the traffic arrived

i doubt about ruleset in mastershaper demo about why use hfsc at leaf class but inner class use htb??? how different for manage traffic like it???? /bin/false qdisc add dev eth1 handle 1: root htb default 1 /bin/false class add dev eth1 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 2048Kbit ######### Incoming Rules ######### chain HB /bin/false class add dev eth1 parent 1:1 classid 1:21 htb rate 128Kbit ceil

Hello... Im trying to setup HTB to allow me to shape traffic from two upstreams that meets on single lan0 interface. I prefer to use HTB qdisc within HTB root qdisc for cleaner rules design. Seems that it doesnt work at all. tc -s class show doesnt show any traffic on other classes attached to HTB qdisc. Linux 2.6.20.7 iproute-2.6.20-070313 Weird thing is that tc -s class show that 1: and 2:

Dear list, I have the problem that child classes don''t seem to issue the parent class to borrow from their parent. This is a simplified version of my script: tc qdisc del dev $DEV root tc qdisc add dev $DEV root handle 1: htb default 10 tc class add dev $DEV parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 10mbit tc class add dev $DEV parent 1:1 classid 1:10 htb rate 1kbit ceil 512kbit #groups tc

Hello List, I use HTB in a ~80 users serving router with kernel 2.4.20. eth0 is the internet interface (half-duplex 1Mbit), eth1 the internal interface (100Mbit full duplex) cause of the fact that the router also serves as a http-proxy (squid) i thought setting up the default class on eth1 with the real upload-speed (100Mbit) would do the job, i.e. shaping normal stuff to 1Mbit except local

Hello i''m having some issues trying to match packets using iptables mark, iproute filter and tc filter.- i mean, when i do iptables -t mangle -A INPUT -p tcp --dport 80 -j MARK --set-mark 20 iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -p tcp --dport 25 -j MARK --set-mark 10 iptables -t mangle -A FORWARD -p tcp -i eth0 -o eth1 --dport 25 -j MARK --set-mark 10 $TC qdisc del dev $INET_IFACE root $TC

Hello! I have an internet connection of 64kbps garanteed in a channel of 256kbps. On this connection the metropolitan speed is 10Mbps and in the provider''s network the speed is 100Mbps. I have a few clients behind my linux box and i want to set up some limitations because some of them are using it irrational. I am marking the packets with 0 for internet; 1 for metropolitan 2 for

Hi, I´m shaping traffic using htb on both interfaces, I noticed that shaping download traffic is workinggreat but shaping upload traffic is not working at all (no sent packets, no dropped, no overlimits)I have eth0 facing the backbone and eth1 facing the LAN. Thanks for your help.These are the commands I run:tc qdisc del dev eth0 root tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1 htb default 10 r2q 5 tc

Hi Stef, Sorry to write to you directly but my list membership is not working, I receive the archive but cant send to the list, cant delete myself because I don''t exist and can''t rejoin as they say I do exist, anyway hope you don''t mind Can you tell me what the difference between these two scripts is please. What I want to achieve is a high speed channel 1000kbit from

Here goes the filter statements: #Initializing traffic control... tc qdisc add dev br0 root handle 1:0 htb #Loading queue disciplines for plis230 network... tc class add dev br0 parent 1:0 classid 1:1 htb rate 512kbit ceil 512kbit #Loading queue disciplines for pmad048 network... tc class add dev br0 parent 1:1 classid 1:20 htb rate 30kbit ceil 30kbit #server queue tc class add dev br0 parent

Hello all, I have set my QoS solution and now I am facing a little problem... When I ping to my server it has some lost packages: Estatísticas do Ping para 172.30.0.1: Pacotes: SENDED = 1029, RETURNED = 880, LOST = 149 (14% de perda), Aproximar um número redondo de vezes em milissegundos: Mínimo = 0ms, Máximo = 686ms, Média = 105ms If I disable my QoS ping stats to be ok. I even have

Hi all! I''m new to this list, and hope for some clarity in this matter: I have a home-gateway with linux-2.6.9 and iproute2 (ver:2.6.9). My following tc syntaxes. # eth0 internet scheduleing are: tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb default 20 tc class add dev eth0 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 512kbit burst 6k tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:1 classid 1:10 htb rate 512kbit burst

Hi everyone, My HTB script is showing me those "r2q change" warnings. I read that I should test with r2q values to gain accuracy and stop the warnings but I made some tests with r2q and with burst and I still get the warnings. Any ideas on this issue will be very helpful. The script seems to be working as the bandwidth for the IPs is being shaped. The NIC works at 100mbit and the

Hi Gang, I''m still experiencing some bandwidth starvation with my script (below), so I decided to look at the statistics by using: tc -s qdisc show dev eth0 (where eth0 is the interface I''m trying to rate-limit outbound packets) I get, for example: qdisc sfq 21: quantum 1514b perturb 10sec Sent 133527926 bytes 413260 pkts (dropped 0, overlimits 0) qdisc sfq 20: quantum

Yes sure here they are: The first one that i have received 2day and does not work almost at all: #!/bin/bash ETH_IN="eth1" ETH_OUT="eth0" BANDA_TOTALA="2Mbit" # pentru neclasificati ar trebui sa fie banda minima - 1k - aici ar trebui sa ajunga trafic necunoscut, # care nu e organizat in shape-uri BANDA_NECLASIFICATI="8kbit" #Shape generale /sbin/tc

Hello all, I am trying to configure a linux box to make some QoS into my netowork and, at the same box, control my clients bandwidth. I have this classes created: ---------------------------------------------------------------- UP="eth0" # wan infocontabil DL01="eth2" # lan clientes $TC qdisc del dev $DL01 root 2> /dev/null >

Hi I have tested with FC3 but iam not able get any good results on that. in the list some one recomend me that > 3.17 HTB should work I saw latest FC4 test2 has the HTB 3.17 with iptables 1.3.0 i have install in my P4 box, and trying to test when iam uploading its working perfect, but when iam downloading its going to default class can some one experinced the same problem below is the my

We have been using HTB for last 10-11 months without any problem. But from last few days we have been facing huge packet loss when we turn on traffic shaping using HTB. I upgraded to 2.4.24 kernel (without any htb patch), still there is same problem. Avg. traffic is around 2Mbps and 4Mbps at peak hours. There are around 110 HTB classes and SFQ attached to each class. We are using 4 port Tulip

Hi folks, I''m trying to shape two clients in my LAN when accessing the internet. Actual situation is that EVERY traffic goes into 1:40, so the client which should fall into 1:30 does not get the lower uplink it should have, but the uplink defined for the client defined as 1:30 When I disable the definition of 1:40, every traffic falls into 1:30 (except for the traffic defined to be in