similar to: Iptables rules and internet access problems

Dear All, I am trying to enable router mode of tinc on Windows 7 platform. Although I have enabled the router mode and IP routing in Windows 7 PC (Network A Server). The PC B is still unable to connect the Network A and PC A. But the Network A and PC A is able to communicate each other via tinc. Please help and advise me any incorrect of that. Network A server Real - LAN adapter IP:

Hi - Thanks to Sven-Haegar and Donald, but still having issues setting up with Windows. Machine1 can't ping the VPN address of machine2. Regular IPv4 address for both machines in 192.168.1.xxx range. Router: Forwarding port 655 to 101.102.103.1, UDP and TCP Forwarding port 656 to 101.102.103.2, UDP and TCP Tinc.conf on machine user1 just three lines: Name = vpnuser1 ConnectTo =

Hi, Thanks to John Wice for helping me with an earlier question. My two PCs behind the same router are still having problems connecting. Would appreciate thoughts on what I?m doing wrong? Router: Port 655 forwarded to 192.168.1.45, both TCP and UDP Port 656 forwarded to 192.168.1.51, both TCP and UDP Machine #1. ========== Local IP address on LAN = 192.168.1.45 Windows Firewall

Guus: I have been test running the VPN between 2 geographically different clusters on a TINC VPN for a couple of days. How confident are you in the New Protocol in 1.1Pre10? Or should I just play it safe and run the old protocol for production? How long do you think it will take for you to have confidence in the new protocol? When do you think you will gain that confidence? You should be

Hi! I'm currently using Tinc to create a VPN between a Linux server, a Windows server, and my local laptop and desktop computers (both running Windows). I picked an IP in the 10.123.1.x range for each server, and added something like "Subnet = 10.123.1.1/32" to each host config file. It's working very well! What I'd like to do now is expose an extra subnet to the VPN. The

Hi All, I am trying to setup the site-to-site VPN with TINC for connect my home network to company network. Here is the IP allocation and configuration for your reference. Home PC (192.168.1.2) ?-----? Home (OPENWRT Router, 192.168.1.1, 10.0.0.1) ?----------------? INTERNET ?-------------? COMPANY (Windows 7 PC,192.168.2.1, 10.0.0.2) ?------------? COMPANY (SERVER ZONE) ?----? SERVER A

Hey List, Hey Guus, I would now like to secure my tinc installation. From the man page I see the following. -L I put EXTRA="-L" in /etc/default/tinc and tinc still works. -R Do I have to put libraries and device files under /etc/tinc/NETNAME to build a functional chroot jail ? Currently lsof reports these open resources for tincd: lsof -p $( pgrep tincd ) -n COMMAND PID USER FD

Hi, I´m using Tinc for several years, but I didn´t fix a performance problem. There a about 20 nodes in this network. Master: 10.0.0.12 (dedicated host in a datacenter, debian, 100mBit port) tinc.conf: Name = TincKnoten12 AddressFamily = ipv4 Interface = tun ProcessPriority=high mode = router #DirectOnly = no Compression=0 PMTUDiscovery = yes #IndirectData = yes #ReplayWindow = 64 #ConnectTo

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=898 Summary: support for AddressFamily in sshd_config Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 3.8.1p1 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: sshd AssignedTo: openssh-bugs at mindrot.org ReportedBy: peak

hi. I suggest you to look at "Automatic Dependencies" in https://www.freedesktop.org/software/systemd/man/systemd.service.html. I think using "After=" and "Recuires=" is more suitable. On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 4:48 PM, md at rpzdesign.com <md at rpzdesign.com> wrote: > Hello Tinc'ers: > > I want to use TIncVPN in a systemd Ubuntu environment.

I see that there is a new sshd_config in the latest updates. Since I have altered the original file, this one got installed as .rpmnew It has two changes: > #AddressFamily any So does this make it default to IPv4 only? > #ChrootDirectory none Chroot is now an option for SSH?

We have a handful of nodes set up. Some are NAT'd but a few have direct access to the Internet. Sample confs: HostA: Name = HostA AddressFamily = any Interface = tap0 Mode = switch Connectto = HostB GraphDumpFile = /tmp/mesh HostB: Name = HostB AddressFamily = any Interface = tap0 Mode = switch Connectto = HostA GraphDumpFile = /tmp/mesh And so on. If I use HostA as the main meta sever.

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3526 Bug ID: 3526 Summary: Config option AddressFamily has no effect? Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 9.0p1 Hardware: amd64 OS: Mac OS X Status: NEW Severity: trivial Priority: P5 Component: ssh Assignee: unassigned-bugs at

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=534 brent at graveland.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|FIXED | ------- Additional Comments From brent at graveland.net 2003-06-23 09:29

Thanks. I played with it some more, and finally got it working. I am willing to write up a detailed how-to, including screen shots, if you guys are interested. Just tell me in what format you want the write-up. Cheers, From: Daniel J. Grinkevich Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2015 7:26 AM To: tinc at tinc-vpn.org Subject: RE: Please help debug Windows setup Your port forward needs to

On Tue, 30 Jun 2015, Damien Miller wrote: | On Mon, 29 Jun 2015, Tim Rice wrote: | | > On Tue, 30 Jun 2015, Damien Miller wrote: | > | > | I think we should just disable the test if the host doesn't support IPv6. | > | | > | diff --git a/regress/cfgparse.sh b/regress/cfgparse.sh | > | index 7f377d8..e19b4d0 100644 | > | --- a/regress/cfgparse.sh | > | +++

Hello Lars, Thanks for your feedback. Unfortunately I made an error in writing the network I expected to connect to. I meant 10.3.0.0/24 The one I wrote in fact was one network of the already established VPN. I have included full details of my relevant files below. Background: I am trying to set up a second VPN between two servers: gtdb and db2. Both servers are already part of separate

Window allows one to specify a DNS domain name and DNS server for a particular interface. So all DNS queries of your tinc interface are sent to a particular dns server. For instance windows tinc clients can use a particular dns server on a private LAN available only to clients inside that NAT or tinc clients. NetworkManager allows you to specify the same, but the tinc interface does not show up

Hi all, I'm pretty new to CentOS. I am working with a newly set-up server: [cbearden at host ~]$ lsb_release -a LSB Version: :core-4.0-amd64:core-4.0-noarch:graphics-4.0-amd64:graphics-4.0-noarch:printing-4.0-amd64:printing-4.0-noarch Distributor ID: CentOS Description: CentOS release 6.3 (Final) Release: 6.3 Codename: Final I'm trying to solve this problem (X11 forwarding)

Hi, I'm getting this weird error in the logs when starting tinc "Creating metasocket faile: Address family not supported by protocol" I've tried explicitly putting AddressFamily = ipv4 in the tinc.conf file but it doesn't seem to make a difference. The IP's i'm using for the vpn are 10.0.x.x Thanks for your assistance, R. Schwarzenberg -------------- next part