similar to: Pre-requisites to use Java bindings with QEMU

Hi I looked at the java bindings for libvirt at http://libvirt.org/sources/java/ . Latest version here is 0.4.7 whereas the latest version of libvirtd is 0.9.1 . Does the java binding use latest libvirtd ? If not, can it be created easily ? Also, is there any plan to support HyperV support in future ? Thanks Atul -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed...

Hi . I'm using the command 'rsync -avqHlogpDtW" on daily bases and I'd like to know how much data transferred from source to target . Lior Best Regards, Lior Michael * +972-50-5455013 * mailto:liorm@hp.com Our goal is that we will have a VERY SATISFIED customers. For any feedback Please contact either me or my manager Yosi Barkan at +972-50-7200775 -------------- next

Hi all, I have a working ruby app that I developed on Window and I am trying to deploy it on Linox with Apache. The hosting company generated for me an empty rails app and I just replaced the files that I modified in my app (only rb/rhtml/css/js files). In addition I updatd the database.yml but now I am getting either page not found or Application error Rails application failed to start

You did not look right it should be there. https://packages.ubuntu.com/zesty/libpam-krb5 https://packages.ubuntu.com/artful/libpam-krb5 Check this folder to see if "winbind unix krb5" is there. ls /usr/share/pam-configs And run pam-auth-update --force to update the files. ! Note, krb5 has by default set : minium_uid=1000 Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----

I'm slightly confused, you appear to have trimmed down the config, but not changed anything.... would you think this would affect the issue where long standing users are able to log in, but new users are not... even after a couple of weeks they are not able to log in via "winbind", although they can authenticate via Kerberos, and obviously log in to Windows desktops. James August

OK, obviously I am slightly sanitising the output here, but I'm preserving the case, and just replacing local names with generic ones as I did for the config. # more /etc/hostname hostname01 # more /etc/hosts 127.0.0.1 localhost 127.0.1.1 hostname01 # The following lines are desirable for IPv6 capable hosts ::1 ip6-localhost ip6-loopback fe00::0 ip6-localnet ff00::0 ip6-mcastprefix

I think we're getting confused with the kerberos issue created by my errant DNS server... with the original problem, all the commands I have sent showing an issue with kerberos were working originally, with the config which explicitly defined "kdc =", and are now working again, with your new config, now that I have fixed the DNS... but the original problem is that I have a very small

Rowland, I'm following this thread because I'm trying to use Linux member server (Debian 9) and use Windows AD users in Linux (filesystem etc). It seems I have working Kerberos and to a degree, Winbind too, because both wbinfo -u wbinfo -g give me valid and complete results. However I'm stuck with NIS. First I attempted to use AD idmap with settings (smb.conf) idmap config *

Hi, Rowland You were right, it was the Domain Users issue. After setting the gidnumber to a number inside range, users are there. Thank You. And as of change from AD to RIS, the 'net cache flush' is not enough. For the record, I must have rebooted the server. Probably the records have been stored in some NIS cache or so too, that I don't know how to flush on-the-fly. After the

Well, network connectivity to the other DC would probably also be required... and I don't have that currently... so there's the first hurdle... but thanks for confirming that there's no other configuration required. I'm slightly surprised that the smb.conf does not require the full realm name like "DOMAIN2.LOCAL" somewhere in there. James August 24, 2017 12:14 PM,

I have a Solaris 10 U5 system massively patched so that it supports ZFS pool version 15 (similar to U8, kernel Generic_141445-09), live upgrade components have been updated to Solaris 10 U8 versions from the DVD, and GRUB has been updated to support redundant menus across the UFS boot environments. I have studied the Solaris 10 Live Upgrade manual (821-0438) and am unable to find any

Please, could the documentation be enhanced so that it mentions this prerequisite? (Domain Users group must have gidnumber attribute set, and it must be inside idmap range)? Dňa 25.08.2017 o 18:37 tuharsky--- via samba napísal(a): > Hi, Rowland > > You were right, it was the Domain Users issue. After setting the > gidnumber to a number inside range, users are there. > >

OK, that is the answer, but can you explain what an "RID" is from a Windows perspective?... I had thought that the mapping was not a 1-1, and it appears it is, once the idmap range is taken into account. idmap config DOMAIN:range = 5000-300000 My UID's appear to be offset by 5000 from the RID... but I'd love to know exactly what RID is. Many thanks tho, I probably should have

I'm inclined to agree with you regarding resolveconf, but I don't think that's the issue here, clearly it was able to get the name and IP of the AD server.... and connect to it. The error from kinit had the hostname of one of the AD servers in it, that name is not in the config, and that address was reachable... so I can't think that it's DNS. What is worrying me is if this

On Thu, 24 Aug 2017 12:26:11 +0000 "A. James Lewis" <james at fsck.co.uk> wrote: > Well, network connectivity to the other DC would probably also be > required... and I don't have that currently... so there's the first > hurdle... but thanks for confirming that there's no other > configuration required. > > I'm slightly surprised that the

Indeed!... you are correct... this does appear to be the kerberos issue uncovered by Rowlands pointing out that I should not need to be manually defining "kdc =", in my krb5.conf.... so with that resolved, I'm hoping we can also find the cause of my original problem. Incidentally, this was my solution to upgrading Samba on my 17.04 test server, I think moving to 17.10 will

On Fri, 25 Aug 2017 16:03:08 +0200 "Mgr. Peter Tuharsky via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Rowland, > > > I'm following this thread because I'm trying to use Linux member > server (Debian 9) and use Windows AD users in Linux (filesystem etc). > > It seems I have working Kerberos and to a degree, Winbind too, > because both > >

I'm currently running: virsh --version 1.0.2 libvirtd --version libvirtd (libvirt) 1.0.2 I have a couple questions. 1. Can I upgrade my libvirt.so version to use with an older libvirtd? In other words, does the versions of libvirt and libvirtd need to be in lock step? 2. I'm able to use virsh blockcopy, but I want to do it programmatically via C. I looked through the API and was not

Yes indeed.... I know a lot about the Linux side, but Windows is a bit of a mystery to me... and I have to confess to not knowing exactly how nss links various directory services into the system.... hence my comment earlier with "Password file entry" in quotes... I know it's not in the password file, and is amalgamated into the password "map", via nss, but I'm not sure

Hi, I'm trying to configure DoveCot to allow NTLM authentication. I've successfully authenticated with Outlook 2003 against Dovecot when the passdb backend used to store the password is a passwd-file. It doesn't matter if the passwd-file contains plain or NTLM encrypted passwords. When I compare the NTLM hash provided by the dovecotpw utility to the one I have in my SAMBA ldap, it