Displaying 20 results from an estimated 7000 matches similar to: "STDOUT.should_receive(:puts).with Works *** (:print) fails"
2007 Jun 03
3
should_receive.again
Hi,
It appears that if I have 2 should_receives in a row, the latest one
overrides the previous one(s).
If there isn''t one, could we add a way to accumulate them, such as
@thing.should_receive(:method).and_return(@value)
@thing.should_receive(:method).again.and_return(@value)
@thing.should_receive(:method).again.and_return(@value)
would be equivalent to
2008 Mar 08
3
should_receive(:foo).with(any_object)
Hey,
I just ran into a situation where I would like to expect a method call
with an argument I know and another one, which is a random number. I
think mocking up the rand method is somehow ugly so I thought maybe
this is the first time where I can take something from Java to Ruby ;)
Java''s EasyMock mocking library knows things like "anyObject()" and
"anyInteger()" in
2008 Jan 13
2
should_receive twice and arguments
Hi all, I have a method calling Klass.create! two times with different
arguments (this happens in a class reponsable for reading in a csv file)
I want to test those like this:
in one test: Klass.should_receive(:create!).with(:name => "foo").once
in another: Klass.should_receive(:create!).with(:name => "foo2").once
This doesn''t work because the
2007 Aug 17
4
should_receive, used in the wrong place?
What do you guys think of this: if someone calls should_receive
outside of an "it" block, it warns you.
before(:each) do
@foo = Foo.new
@foo.should_receive(:monkeys)
end
would warn you that you''re setting an expectation in the wrong place,
and that "stub" is correct when setting up objects.
Opinions?
courtenay
2008 Mar 14
2
Multiple should_receive(:render).with
I''m trying to specify that a particular view must render two different partials.
My spec looks like:
describe AClass do
it do
template.should_receive(:render).with(:partial => ''foo'', :locals => { ... })
...
end
describe ''some conditional case'' do
it do
template.should_receive(:render).with(:partial =>
2007 Jun 21
4
should_receive stubs methods?
Hey,
I''m using rspec and rails and have a spec that tests if a before_filter is
executed, I also have a spec that tests if a method called by the filter is
executed. It appears however that when I should_receive something, it is no
longer actually called when I fire the http request. I''m not sure how, or
where exactly I should manually fire the filter, either before or after the
2012 Jul 27
3
Rspec: How to mock class method
Hi, I have two model: Message, User
message.rb
```
class Message < ActiveRecord::Base
class << self
def method_a(args)
[1,2]
end
end
end
```
user.rb
```
class User < ActiveRecord::Base
def method_user
if Message.method_a(''anythings'')
#... some code
end
end
end
```
I want to test method_user,but I don''t want to test
2006 Dec 18
2
should_receive and multiple return values
Hi
I just got bit by a misunderstanding about and_return.
I''ve got this controller method parse_parameters that loops over
query string parameters and parses out vehicle registration dates.
We have to turn these into one of three bands (Jan-Feb, Mar-Aug, Sep-
Dec) so I wrote a method (registration_date_to_band_year_and_month)
takes a date and returns two return values, the year
2007 Nov 15
2
Trouble using should_receive
I have this code trying to ensure my reset method works. I want to
make sure all the participants have their destroy method called.
# in my spec for Room
r = Room.new(:name => ''bob'')
r.save
p = Participant.new(:login => ''a'', :password =>
''b'', :password_confirmation => ''b'')
p.room = r
2012 Oct 09
8
unexpected should_receive behaviour
Hi,
surely I''m missing something... but what!?
in my spec I''ve
User.should_receive(:find).with("1").and_return(@user)
and in my controller
User.find(params[:id])
green light... correct...
but if I change my controller using another method, for example first:
User.first
or even
User.all
I get green light too... I was expecting an error like
expected: 1 time
2007 Apr 17
8
problem with rspec_on_rails and @controller.should_receive(:render) in trunk
Hey guys!
I am using rspec trunk, and I am having a little problem with the
latest version. (I am quite sure this worked with an older version
about a week ago)
heres the spec:
it "should render the new user form without layout for a xhr request" do
@controller.should_receive(:render).with(:layout=>false)
xhr :get,:new
end
and the controller:
def new
render
2008 Jun 12
1
how do I mock the Rails Logger with should_receive?
Hey Guys,
I''m trying to mock the Rails Logger for the following code:
...
rescue TimeoutError => error
$logger.error("#{self.name} Timeout for #{path}: #{error}") and return
rescue SocketError => error
$logger.error("#{self.name} SocketError for #{path}: #{error}") and
return
rescue StandardError => error
2008 Jun 12
1
Does anyone know how to mock the Rails Logger then set expectations with should_receive?
Hey Guys,
I''m trying to mock the Rails Logger for the following code:
...
rescue TimeoutError => error
$logger.error("#{self.name} Timeout for #{path}: #{error}") and return
rescue SocketError => error
$logger.error("#{self.name} SocketError for #{path}: #{error}") and
return
rescue StandardError => error
2007 Nov 01
2
Writing controller specs
One thing that is bothering me about my controller specs is that
sometimes I end up with a number of examples that are the same except
for the example name.
The reason that this happens is that I''ve expressed all the expected
behavior with should_receive. While this does more or less work as
intended it doesn''t feel right.
As an example, let''s say I''m writing
2007 Feb 20
1
having should_receive expectation for things that happen in setup
Hi!
The following example doesn''t work for me: http://pastie.caboo.se/41732
However, if the call to msg() happens in the specify block after the
expecation and not in the setup, it will pass.
Why is this? I thought the setup method was there to actually
''construct'' the context and the specifications are some kind of
"postconditions" that only need to be
2006 Oct 23
6
overriding mock expectations
There is one annoyance I''m encountering with the Mock API in rSpec.
Overall it works well, as far as dynamic mocks go ;)... but there''s
this one thing... It doesn''t allow overriding of expectations.
example:
m = mock("blah")
m.should_receive(:one).any_number_of_times().and_return(1)
m.should_receive(:one).and_return(1)
The second call to should_receive
2011 Jul 27
3
Rspec with ActionMailer and .deliver
I''m in the process of migrating from Rails 2 with rspec 1 to Rails 3 with
rspec 2, the process has been going pretty well, however, today I came
across an issue that I wanted to share.
I have a controller that sends out an email through a mailer.
Rails 2
code: CurriculumCommentMailer.deliver_comment_update(@curriculum_comment,
"created")
Rails 3 code:
2007 Jun 11
2
Testing create in Rails controller
Hi All
So I am a first-time caller ;-) ... and have been trying to apply
RSpec to the depot example in Dave Thomas'' book as I build the
application.
I am having a problem testing the admin controller create method and
cannot quite see where I am going wrong so was hoping for a pointer :-)
My spec looks like:
describe AdminController do
before(:each) do
@product =
2006 Dec 21
1
need some guidance with a test
This is part of a rails project. The following method is part of the Ams
class (a rails model). I''m a bit unsure of the rspec/bdd way of testing this
method.
def persist_as_domains
@current_domains.each do |d|
dom = Domain.new
dom.domain = d
dom.source_id = 1
dom.at = Time.now
dom.save
end
end
The following is what came out when I tried to write my test. Notice
2007 Feb 07
3
odd mock behavior
I''m seeing some odd behavior around the should_receive() when given a
block combined with some cardinality.
For example, with the following...
my_mock.should_receive(:foo).twice do |i|
puts i
end
... the spec passes but i never gets puts''ed.
With the following...
my_mock.should_receive(:foo) do |i|
puts i
end
... i gets puts''ed twice but the spec fails because