similar to: Can't connect to DSL modem on em1

Hi, I have a machine with a Debian Stable installation that runs OpenVSwitch to connect a virtual machine on the same box. The machine is also running shorewall. The problem that I''m having is that shorewall try to run before openvswitch, this makes that shorewall fails because it can''t determine the IP of the virtual interface generated by openvswitch that start after

Hi folks, I took the plunge recently to move NAT from my router to my shorewall config, and mostly things are ok. Most traffic moves around without problems but sometimes I am having trouble accessing external webservers from non-gateway internal computers. I have stared at the traffic in wireshark (even 2 wiresharks on different interfaces) but can''t see the problem. Nevertheless

Hi, I need to do various things in the init script to be able to run shorewall at all. I noticed, that shorewall currently doesn''t check the return value of a called script (would be nice, if shorewall would do, or is there a reason not to do?). I could wrap my action and check return values on my own and if an error occurred, I could call "exit 1". But this isn''t

Hi, see the log below root at AsteriskSlave:~# ip addr 1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN group default link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00 inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever inet6 ::1/128 scope host valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever 2: p3p1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu

I just see warning? 2016-08-29 11:30 GMT-03:00, Telium Technical Support <support at telium.ca>: > This shows that asterisk's IAX is already bound to all adapters - so that's > good. Symptomatically does your IAX stop working? Or do you just see a > warning? > > -----Original Message----- > From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com >

Oh! In that case ignore it. Asterisk won't rebind the adapter if you've only changed parameters. The message is misleading -----Original Message----- From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Vitor Mazuco Sent: Monday, August 29, 2016 10:41 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re:

Hi, I have already tried to change for bindaddr=0.0.0.0 but it didn't worked. 2016-08-26 11:44 GMT-03:00, Frank Vanoni <mailinglist at linuxista.com>: > On Fri, 2016-08-26 at 10:12 -0300, Vitor Mazuco wrote: > >> bindaddr = all > > Try: > > bindaddr=0.0.0.0 > > > > > -- > _____________________________________________________________________

Hi all, I've recently started using NetworkManger service and nmcli tool, I like it much better than the old network service and manually modifying network scripts. I've seen many online questions on how to disable NetworkManger but I have the opposite question! I am wondering if it be OK to disable network service altogether and just use NetworkManger for configuring and managing Ethernet

Hi, I need some help with a routing/shaping setup that is a bit beyond my current linux routing knowledge. I''ve read the how-to and most of the related mailing list topics, but I still need some help to solve this problem. I''ve been asking questions on various lists, but it seems like the answers just add additional confusion. I decided to just describe what I''m trying

Hi All, I see an unexpected beahviour from NetworkManager on CentOS 7.1. Using nmcli tool, I create a bond with two slaves as explained in the Red Hat 7.1 Networking guide. I enable slaves and master; bond works as expected. When I restart NetworkManager, it creates a new bond with the same name but not connected to any device. Two bonds with the same name is confusing for my other monitoring

So, I'm getting an error where the network service and NetworkManager apparently don't agree on how to bring up vlans on bonded nics. Things come up if you 'ifup ..' manually. I thought I'd check if there were any updates, forgetting to fix what NetworkManger had done to /etc/resolv.conf and: http://centos.arvixe.com/7.0.1406/os/x86_64/repodata/repomd.xml: [Errno 12] Timeout

Dear All, I'm currently troubleshooting NetworkManger scripts. I see a difference in machine A : drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 apr 24 16:33 . drwxr-xr-x 5 root root 4096 jan 9 12:13 .. -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 175 jan 9 12:13 00-netreport -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 335 okt 22 2012 04-iscsi -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 345 jan 9 12:13 05-netfs -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 926 sep 25 2012 10-dhclient

How to configure DNS server and search domain common for all network interfaces not per device? The only reliable way I found we can set DNS name server and search domain in CentOS 7 is using nmcli which adds DNS name server and search domain to *a specific interface*, e.g. nmcli con mod eth0 +ipv4.dns [IP_ADDRESS]. But I want to set them for all interfaces weather they are configure and

On 07/07/16 05:36 PM, Digimer wrote: > On 07/07/16 05:21 PM, Joe Smithian wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> I see an unexpected beahviour from NetworkManager on CentOS 7.1. >> Using nmcli tool, I create a bond with two slaves as explained in the Red >> Hat 7.1 Networking guide. I enable slaves and master; bond works as >> expected. >> When I restart

----- Oorspronkelijk bericht ----- Van: "James Hogarth" <james.hogarth at gmail.com> Aan: "CentOS mailing list" <centos at centos.org> Verzonden: Donderdag 11 juni 2015 19:59:39 Onderwerp: Re: [CentOS] NetworkManager / wireless on latest Centos7 installs On 11 Jun 2015 13:28, <johan.vermeulen7 at telenet.be> wrote: > > > > ----- Oorspronkelijk

----- Oorspronkelijk bericht ----- Van: "johan vermeulen7" <johan.vermeulen7 at telenet.be> Aan: "CentOS mailing list" <centos at centos.org> Verzonden: Dinsdag 9 juni 2015 18:23:58 Onderwerp: Re: [CentOS] NetworkManager / wireless on latest Centos7 installs ----- Oorspronkelijk bericht ----- Van: "m roth" <m.roth at 5-cent.us> Aan: "CentOS

Oh, and if you don't have killall installed, you can use: ps -ef | grep yum to get the pid and then use: kill -TERM pid or easier even is: kill -TERM `pid of yum` Chris On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 4:13 PM, Chris Stone <axisml at gmail.com> wrote: > try CTRL-Z to put that running process in your shell to sleep, then: > > bg 1 > > to put the process in the background.

I have just installed 6.3 on a machine that was previously running 5.8. Under 5.8 eth0 was eth0. Now with 6.3 /sbin/ifconfig gives me lo, wlan0 and p4p1 (instead of eth0). I would like to make the ethernet a static IP as I intend to for this to be machine used on my LAN only. However, when I do /usr/sbin/setup -> Network Configuration the device is not listed. Can anyone tell me why this is

I am trying to set up an ipsec net-to-net VPN and am having problems. Here is a diagram of the setup: LAN A --> Host A ----> Internet <---- Host B <-- LAN B LAN A = 10.10.2.0/24 LAN A gateway = 10.10.2.254 Host A internal = 10.10.2.254 Host A external = xx.xx.xx.xx Host B external (see below) Host B internal = 10.10.1.10 LAN B = 10.10.1.0/24 LAN B gateway = 10.10.1.252 (F5 Big

Yup, verified those options are *not* set in 7.2. For a quick test I simply removed them from /usr/lib/systemd/system/NetworkManager.service, did a systemctl daemon-reload, restarted NetworkManager, logged back in as root, and was able to whack /home (7.3). On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 11:07 AM, Matthew Miller <mattdm at mattdm.org> wrote: > On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 02:29:28PM -0500, Jonathan