similar to: FW: Routing public IP''s through a gateway

Greeting all, I have a bit of a complicated question. I have two ethernet devices, eth1 and eth2. eth1 is where my internet comes from. It is in the form of 202.172.122.208/29. It has another IP range, 202.172.122.72/29. What I want to be able to do is route 202.172.122.72/29 to eth2, so that other machines can use those IPs, any ideas on how to do this, I cannot work out how to do this.

Home again. Fixed SSL checking for Redhat 9, I hope. Could someone test if it actually works now? Also fixed a few compiler warnings. If this thing works, I'll just update the NEWS file and call it 0.99.10. http://dovecot.procontrol.fi/rc/ Near future plans include rewriting parts of index handling. At least .tree file will go, I've a _much_ better idea how to replace it. .data file is

Hi, I am having trouble compiling R-2.10.0 on the Solaris x86_64 platform using the native solaris-studio cc/F99 compilers. I am pretty sure that I have all my environment set up for a 64-bit compile. However, when doing a make I get the following error: /opt/solstudio12.2/bin/cc -m64 -I./api -I. -I../../../src/include -I../../../src/include -I/usr/local/include -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -KPIC -xO3 -c

I am running R 2.3.1 on a Windows XP machine. I am trying to import some data into R that is stored as an S-Plus 7.0 .sdd file. When I run the following command, I get this error: > library(foreign) > d <- read.S(file='H:\\Research\\data.sdd') Error in read.S(file = "H:\\Research\\data.sdd") : not an S object The dataset is fairly large, roughly 13000 rows

I am running R 2.3.1 on a Windows XP machine. I am trying to import some data into R that is stored as an S-Plus 7.0 .sdd file. When I run the following command, I get this error: > library(foreign) > d <- read.S(file='H:\\Research\\data.sdd') Error in read.S(file = "H:\\Research\\data.sdd") : not an S object The dataset is fairly large, roughly 13000 rows

The ISP will only route packets to the dom0 mac address; they are fully automated and will not accept custom requests. They don''t even support solaris, I had to do the install using vmware to have solaris in native on this dedicated hosting. DOM0_IP is a public IP and ipv4 forwarding is enabled. DOMU_IP is a public IP on the DOM0 side in my /etc/default/inetinit I have: route add -host

Does anyone have any idea what to try next? Here are the steps I have taken and the problem: (I wanted to post my question on the first line before I explained the problem and what I have tried) ---------- Node 0 has the file system mounted just fine and works great. When trying to mount on Node 1: `mount.ocfs2 /dev/mapper/data /cluster/ data` I get this error after about 30 seconds:

Hi, I have the shown (end of this post) net work configuration. In a "few" words: My Debian Sarge server is connected to a D-Link ADSL Router (DSL-562T). DMZ is enabled for the Debian Sarge IP on the Router. My Linux server has two NIC''s. ethlan = internal Net ethdsl = external -> D-Link My Linux server is configured to make NAT via iptables. Current state -

Hi, I have a linux box with two dsl modems on it (connection is done via pppoe), I''m trying to route default traffic on the primary connection (ppp0) and mail traffic on another one (ppp1). This traffic will come from the localhost. I run Slackware 9.1 (Kernel 2.4.22), recompiled with necessary options for using iproute2. According to the advanced routing howto, I did the following

I apologise for writing again about the problem with using stepAIC + multinom, but I think the reason why I had it in the first place is perhaps there may be a bug in either stepAIC or multinom. Just to repeat the problem, I have 126 variables and 99 cases. I don't know if the large number of variables could be the problem. Of couse the reason for doing a stepwise method is to reduce this

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10035 Summary: rsync hangs in solaris Product: rsync Version: 3.0.9 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: nestor.urquiza at gmail.com QAContact:

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=429 ------- Additional Comments From laforge@netfilter.org 2006-01-25 11:00 MET ------- Please specifically tell us about the exact kernel version, any patches that you might have applied, and the iptables version that you're using. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You

Hi. I''ve got here the following configuration: (turn on fixed pitch font to be able to see the scheme in a more accurately way) Client machines <-----> ADSL Router 1 <-----> INTERNET (192.168.0.0/24) (192.168.0.229) NAT Client machines <-----> ADSL Router 1 <-----> INTERNET (192.168.1.0/24) (192.168.1.229) NAT [if doesn''t really

Hi, I support around 15 Windows 2000 Clients who log into and have home directories on a Samba PDC running under RedHat 7.3. The version of samba I am using is 2.5.5. All the clients use Word97 SR2 and they all get the following error while working on documents stored on their home directories on the PDC: Word failed reading from this file (filename.doc). Please restore the network

Hello, first of all thank you for your patience and having answered you. I tried to change port from 8000 to 8001 but nothing happened. I am using a vps server so I don?t need to open port from router. I paste here all my icecast.xml configuration file. can you please give a llok and tell me if all seems ok to you? still thank you! *** root at mail2:/etc/icecast2# nano icecast.xml GNU nano

Hi?guys. There is a wierd problem with iptables recently, hopes somebody can help me. I have installed Centos 7.2.1511 on a bare metal Dell server these days, disabled firewalld and enabled iptables.services, and setup a group of very simple rules, as the following: # iptables-save # Generated by iptables-save v1.4.21 on Tue Apr 23 09:15:14 2019 *filter :INPUT ACCEPT [0:0] :FORWARD ACCEPT

Hi, Thanks for the fast response, .)Okay I tried your suggestion for my port 8099 and nothing happened: The tcp ip information goes from a firewall to my port 8099 and this port is than routed to the original 8080, I do that because I don`t want to dirturb my port 8080. But it seams the ingress filter doesn`t work on it!! iptables -L -t nat Chain PREROUTING (policy ACCEPT) target prot opt

On 27.06.2018 13:43, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Wed, 27 Jun 2018 13:04:12 +0200 > basti via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> Hello, >> when I try to login to AD member via IP-Address from Windows Client it >> works. >> >> Login to AD Member from Windows Client via DNS Name fail. >> Windows Errorcode: 0x80070035 >>

Hello, I have an issue with multiple connections to the Internet. I tried following the steps described in [1] but things are not working properly. I would like the network setup as follows: ______ | |- ppp0 -- Dynamic IP (PPPoE on eth2) Internal---- eth0 | GW | |____|- eth1 -- Static IP -> Static''s GW From [1], the

I have a NetGear FV318 living in my DMZ, with one of its LAN-ports living in my LOC zone. What rules are needed in shorewall to allow a certain subnet to make connections to this device from the net zone? Do I define it as a tunnel in shorewall/tunnels, or do I just allow some selected traffic to the DMZ IP? I am not sure which of the docs are right for me in this case?